Evaluation of BD MAX Staph SR Assay for Differentiating Between Staphylococcus aureus and Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci and Determining Methicillin Resistance Directly From Positive Blood Cultures

被引:14
|
作者
Lee, Jaewoong [1 ]
Park, Yeon-Joon [1 ]
Park, Dong-Jin [1 ]
Park, Kang-Gyun [1 ]
Lee, Hae Kyung [2 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Korea, Seoul St Marys Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Lab Med, 222 Banpodaero, Seoul 06591, South Korea
[2] Catholic Univ Korea, Uijeongbu St Marys Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Lab Med, Uijongbu, South Korea
关键词
BD MAX; Staph SR; MRSA; Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus; Ct value; Methicillin; MREJ; IDENTIFICATION; EPIDEMIOLOGY;
D O I
10.3343/alm.2017.37.1.39
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: We evaluated the performance of the BD MAX StaphSR Assay (SR assay; BD, USA) for direct detection of Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin resistance not only in S. aureus but also in coagulase-negative Staphylococci (CNS) from positive blood cultures. Methods: From 228 blood culture bottles, 103 S. aureus [45 methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), 55 methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA), 3 mixed infections (1 MRSA+Enterococcus faecalis, 1 MSSA+MRCNS, 1 MSSA+MSCNS)], and 125 CNS (102 MRCNS, 23 MSCNS) were identified by Vitek 2. For further analysis, we obtained the cycle threshold (Ct) values from the BD MAX system software to determine an appropriate cutoff value. For discrepancy analysis, conventional mecA/mecC PCR and oxacillin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined. Results: Compared to Vitek 2, the SR assay identified all 103 S. aureus isolates correctly but failed to detect methicillin resistance in three MRSA isolates. All 55 MSSA isolates were correctly identified by the SR assay. In the concordant cases, the highest Ct values for nuc, mecA, and mec right-extremity junction (MREJ) were 25.6, 22, and 22.2, respectively. Therefore, we selected Ct values from 0-27 as a range of positivity, and applying this cutoff, the sensitivity/specificity of the SR assay were 100%/100% for detecting S. aureus, and 97.9%/98.1% and 99.0%/95.8% for detecting methicillin resistance in S. aureus and CNS, respectively. Conclusions: We propose a Ct cutoff value for nuc/mec assay without considering MREJ because mixed cultures of MSSA and MRCNS were very rare (0.4%) in the positive blood cultures.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 44
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of a triplex PCR assay to discriminate Staphylococcus aureus from coagulase-negative staphylococci and determine methicillin resistance from blood cultures
    Maes, N
    Magdalena, J
    Rottiers, S
    De Gheldre, Y
    Struelens, MJ
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2002, 40 (04) : 1514 - 1517
  • [2] Methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci:: Epidemiologilcal and molecular aspects
    Martins, Andre
    Cunha, Maria de Lourdes R. S.
    MICROBIOLOGY AND IMMUNOLOGY, 2007, 51 (09) : 787 - 795
  • [3] Rapid detection of methicillin-sensitive and resistanct Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococci from blood cultures by automated PCR assay
    JJ Hirvonen
    S-S Kaukoranta
    BMC Proceedings, 5 (Suppl 6)
  • [4] Detection of methicillin resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci and in staphylococci directly from simulated blood cultures using the EVIGENE MRSA Detection Kit
    Poulsen, AB
    Skov, R
    Pallesen, LV
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2003, 51 (02) : 419 - 421
  • [5] Evaluation of Moxalactam with the BD phoenix system for detection of methicillin resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci
    Pupin, H.
    Renaudin, H.
    Join-Lambert, O.
    Bebear, C.
    Megraud, F.
    Lehours, P.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2007, 45 (06) : 2005 - 2008
  • [6] Triplex real-time polymerase chain reaction assay for simultaneous detection of Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci and determination of methicillin resistance directly from positive blood culture bottles
    Kilic, Abdullah
    Muldrew, Kenneth L.
    Tang, Yi-Wei
    Basustaoglu, A. Celal
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2010, 66 (04) : 349 - 355
  • [7] New quadriplex PCR assay for detection of methicillin and mupirocin resistance and simultaneous discrimination of Staphylococcus aureus from coagulase-negative staphylococci
    Zhang, KY
    Sparling, J
    Chow, BL
    Elsayed, S
    Hussain, Z
    Church, DL
    Gregson, DB
    Louie, T
    Conly, JM
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2004, 42 (11) : 4947 - 4955
  • [8] Comparison of the BD Phoenix System with the Cefoxitin Disk Diffusion Test for Detection of Methicillin Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci
    Mencacci, Antonella
    Montecarlo, Ines
    Gonfia, Francesca
    Moretti, Amedeo
    Cardaccia, Angela
    Farinelli, Senia
    Pagliochini, Maria Rita
    Giuliani, Angela
    Basileo, Michela
    Pasticci, Maria Bruna
    Bistoni, Francesco
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2009, 47 (07) : 2288 - 2291
  • [9] Evaluation of the BD PHOENIX automated microbiology system for detection of methicillin resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci
    Horstkotte, MA
    Knobloch, JKM
    Rohde, H
    Dobinsky, S
    Mack, D
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2004, 42 (11) : 5041 - 5046
  • [10] Rapid Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Methicillin-Susceptible S. aureus Directly from Positive Blood Cultures by Use of the BD Max StaphSR Assay
    Ellem, Justin A.
    Olm, Tom
    O'Sullivan, Matthew V. N.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2015, 53 (12) : 3900 - 3904