A prognostic score for prediction of cardiac mortality risk after adenosine stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy

被引:87
|
作者
Hachamovitch, R
Hayes, SW
Friedman, JD
Cohen, I
Berman, DS
机构
[1] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Imaging, Div Nucl Med, Dept Med,Div Cardiol,CSMC Burns & Allen Res Inst, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
[2] Univ So Calif, Keck Sch Med, Div Cardiovasc Med, Dept Med, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Med, Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jacc.2004.08.069
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES We sought to derive and validate a score to estimate risk after adenosine stress. BACKGROUND Maximizing the prognostic information extracted from adenosine stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy, a commonly performed test, is often challenging for referring physicians. METHODS A split-set validation of a score predicting cardiovascular mortality was performed in 5,873 consecutive patients studied by adenosine stress, dual-isotope single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT; follow-up 94% complete, mean 2.2 +/- 1.1 years). RESULTS On follow-up, 387 cardiac deaths occurred (6.6%). The Cox proportional hazards model most predictive of cardiac death included age, % myocardiuni ischemic, % myocardium fixed, early revascularization, dyspnea, diabetes mellitus, rest and peak stress heart rates, abnormal rest electrocardiogram (ECG), and an interaction between % myocardium ischemic and early revascularization (chi-square = 376). The final prognostic score was calculated as follows: (age [decades] x 5.19) + (% myocardium ischemic [per 10%] x 4.66) + (% myocardium fixed [per 10%] x 4.81) + (diabetes mellitus x 3.88) + (if patient treated with early revascularization, 4.51) + (if dyspnea was a presenting symptom, 5.47) + (resting heart rate [per 10 beats] x 2.88) - (peak heart rate [per 10 beats] x 1.42) + (ECG score x 1.95) (if patient treated with early revascularization, % myocardium ischemic [per 10%] x 4.47). Scores of < 49, 49 to 57, and > 57 identified low, intermediate, and high risk (0.9%, 3.3%, and 9.5% cardiac death/year, respectively). Score results further risk stratified patients with respect to cardiac death in all categories of SPECT abnormality. CONCLUSIONS We derived and validated a score incorporating data available after adenosine stress perfusion SPECT. This score maximizes the prognostic information extracted from this test and may enhance the application of this test as part of an overall strategy. (C) 2005 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
引用
收藏
页码:722 / 729
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] ADENOSINE TL-201 MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION SCINTIGRAPHY
    VERANI, MS
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1991, 122 (01) : 269 - 278
  • [32] Myocardial perfusion imaging using adenosine triphosphate stress multi-slice spiral computed tomography - Alternative to stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy
    Kurata, A
    Mochizuki, T
    Koyama, Y
    Haraikawa, T
    Suzuki, J
    Shigematsu, Y
    Higaki, J
    CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2005, 69 (05) : 550 - 557
  • [33] Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (SPECT) during adenosine stress can be performed safely early on after thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction
    Bouvier, F
    Höjer, J
    Hulting, J
    Ruiz, H
    Samad, B
    Jensen-Urstad, M
    CLINICAL PHYSIOLOGY, 1998, 18 (02): : 97 - 101
  • [34] Development and validation of a prognostic score integrating remote heart failure symptoms and clinical variables in mortality risk prediction after myocardial infarction: the PragueMi score
    Wohlfahrt, Peter
    Jenca, Dominik
    Melenovsky, Vojtech
    Stehlik, Josef
    Mrazkova, Jolana
    Sramko, Marek
    Kotrc, Martin
    Zelizko, Michael
    Adamkova, Vera
    Pit'ha, Jan
    Kautzner, Josef
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 31 (14) : 1713 - 1720
  • [35] Real-time perfusion adenosine stress echocardiography versus myocardial perfusion adenosine scintigraphy for the detection of myocardial ischaemia in patients with stable coronary artery disease
    Gudmundsson, P
    Winter, R
    Dencker, M
    Kitlinski, M
    Thorsson, O
    Ljunggren, L
    Willenheimer, R
    CLINICAL PHYSIOLOGY AND FUNCTIONAL IMAGING, 2006, 26 (01) : 32 - 38
  • [36] Medium term prognostic value of stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in a chest pain unit
    de Azevedo, Jader Cunha
    Felix, Renata Christian Martins
    Correa, Patricia Lavatori
    Barbirato, Gustavo Borges
    Dohmann, Hans Fernando da Rocha
    da Silva, Paulo Roberto Dutra
    Mesquita, Evandro Tinoco
    Mesquita, Claudio Tinoco
    ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2007, 88 (05) : 602 - 610
  • [37] Comparison of Side Effects and Number of Rescans with Adenosine and Regadenoson for Pharmacological Stress in Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy
    Macarico, D. Teixeira
    Laurins, C.
    Smith, P.
    Nicol, A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2018, 45 : S762 - S762
  • [38] MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION BY TL-201 SCINTIGRAPHY BEFORE AND AFTER CARDIAC REHABILITATION
    CHARUZI, Y
    VYDEN, J
    BERMAN, D
    FREEMAN, M
    CLOOBECK, S
    WAXMAN, A
    MICKLE, E
    FORRESTER, J
    CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1979, 27 (02): : A158 - A158
  • [39] Prediction of cardiac mortality after myocardial infarction: The role of maximal treadmill stress echocardiography
    Vasey, CG
    Usedom, JE
    Woodard, SM
    Bhapkar, M
    Schwartz, T
    Koch, GG
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, 2001, 14 (01) : 38 - 43
  • [40] QT dispersion at rest and during adenosine stress myocardial perfusion imaging correlation with myocardial Jeopardy Score
    Pradhan, J.
    Vankayala, H.
    Niraj, A.
    Kumaravelu, P.
    Trivedi, M.
    Thatai, D.
    Afonso, L.
    CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, 2008, 31 (05) : 205 - 210