Soybean Yield Response to Pyraclostrobin and Drainage Water Management

被引:34
|
作者
Nelson, K. A. [1 ]
Meinhardt, C. G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Div Plant Sci, Novelty, MO 63460 USA
关键词
SEPTORIA BROWN SPOT; FROGEYE LEAF-SPOT; SUDDEN-DEATH SYNDROME; ENHANCE CROP YIELDS; SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE; TABLE MANAGEMENT; TILE DRAINAGE; SUBIRRIGATION; IRRIGATION; FUNGICIDE;
D O I
10.2134/agronj2011.0112
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Although pyraclostrobin {carbamic acid, [2,[[[1-(4-chlorophenyl)-1H-pyrazol-3-yl]oxy] methyl] phenyl]methoxy-,methyl ester} has been used to protect soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] from foliar diseases, its interaction with drainage water management (DWM) systems was unknown. Field research during two wet years (95 to 97 mm greater than the past decade) evaluated the effects of pyraclostrobin application timing (R3, R5, R3+R5, and R3+R5+lambda-cyhalothrin) and DWM system (nondrained and drainage only [DO] or drainage plus subirrigation [DSI] at 6.1 and 12.2 m drain tile spacings) on soybean yield, grain quality, and severity of Septoria brown spot (SBS) (Septoria glycines) and frogeye leaf spot (FLS) (Cercospora sojina). Grain yields increased 18 to 22% with DO or DSI at 6.1 and 12.2 m spacings compared to a nonfungicide treated, nondrained control. In the absence of drainage, pyraclostrobin with or without lambda-cyhalothrin increased yields 20 to 27% compared to the nondrained, nonfungicide treated control. The combination of DWM and pyraclostrobin increased grain yields up to 36%. Pyraclostrobin plus lambda-cyhalothrin at R3+R5 increased yield 8 to 12% except with DO at 12.2 m compared to similar nonfungicide-treated DWM systems. A DWM and pyraclostrobin interaction was detected for grain oil and protein concentration, but differences were minimal. Pyraclostrobin with or without lambda-cyhalothrin reduced severity of SBS and FLS 2 to 8% depending on the year, but DWM did not affect severity of these diseases. The greatest synergistic yield increase on a claypan soil occurred when foliar disease management and DWM systems were used together in years with higher than normal rainfall.
引用
收藏
页码:1359 / 1365
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Soybean production management for yield improvement in India
    Bhatnagar, PS
    VII WORLD SOYBEAN RESEARCH CONFERENCE - VI INTERNATIONAL SOYBEAN PROCESSING AND UTILIZATION CONFERENCE - III CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE SOJA, PROCEEDINGS, 2004, : 536 - 544
  • [32] INFLUENCE OF WATER DEFICITS ON SOYBEAN DEVELOPMENT AND YIELD
    THOMAS, AL
    COSTA, JA
    PESQUISA AGROPECUARIA BRASILEIRA, 1994, 29 (09) : 1389 - 1396
  • [33] Changes in Soybean Yield Components in Response to Dicamba
    Foster, Matthew R.
    Griffin, James L.
    AGROSYSTEMS GEOSCIENCES & ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 2 (01) : 1 - 6
  • [34] Soybean grain yield in response to herbicide and fungicides
    Ludwig, Marcos Paulo
    Costa Dutra, Luiz Marcelo
    Lucca Filho, Orlando Antonio
    Zabot, Lucio
    Uhry, Daniel
    Lisboa, Juliano Irion
    CIENCIA RURAL, 2010, 40 (07): : 1516 - 1522
  • [35] Urban drainage water and storm water management
    Pupyrev, EI
    URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT: SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY AND SERVICE DELIVERY, 2003, 25 : 59 - 61
  • [36] Drainage water management for water quality protection
    Strock, Jeffrey S.
    Kleinman, Peter J. A.
    King, Kevin W.
    Delgado, Jorge A.
    JOURNAL OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION, 2010, 65 (06) : 131A - 136A
  • [37] Foliar Boron and Pyraclostrobin Effects on Corn Yield
    Nelson, K. A.
    Meinhardt, C. G.
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2011, 103 (05) : 1352 - 1358
  • [38] CORN AND SOYBEAN YIELD RESPONSE TO CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT UNDER NO-TILLAGE PRODUCTION SYSTEMS
    WILHELM, WW
    DORAN, JW
    POWER, JF
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1986, 78 (01) : 184 - 189
  • [39] Water yield response to integrated native forest management in southeastern Australia
    Erskine, WD
    INTEGRATED WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2001, (272): : 249 - 255
  • [40] Using Corn and Soybean Yield History to Predict Subfield Yield Response
    Bunselmeyer, Hayley A.
    Lauer, Joseph G.
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2015, 107 (02) : 558 - 562