An early phase risk and uncertainty assessment method for CO2 geological storage sites

被引:2
|
作者
Sollie, Ole K. [1 ]
Bernstone, Christian [2 ]
Carpenter, Michael E. [1 ]
Selmer-Olsen, Stale [1 ]
机构
[1] Det Norske Veritas AS, Veritasveien 1, N-1322 Hovik, Norway
[2] Vattenfall Res & Dev AB, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
CO2; storage; risk assessment; uncertainty assessment; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.357
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Early phase risk assessments of prospective CO2 storage sites are frequently characterized by a lack of knowledge, or high degree of uncertainty, in the relevant geological characteristics. The methodology presented here attempts to address this challenge by using facilitated expert workshops to rank key knowledge gaps and risks in order to form the basis for future site characterization work. Taken in the context of the CO2QUALSTORE guideline, the goal of such characterization work should be to provide the evidence required to pass the next decision gate in the project. The degree of involvement from national or regional authorities in this process is likely to be greater where performance based regulations are in place and the current methodology is designed to facilitate this interaction if required. In one of the two European case studies discussed here, Vattenfall have actively engaged the relevant authorities in Germany in the risk assessment process, thus laying the groundwork for future dialogue around characterization requirements and storage site risk management. (C) 2011 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:4132 / 4139
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] CO2 storage risk assessment: feasibility study of the systemic method MOSAR
    Cherkaoui, A.
    Lopez, P.
    SAFETY AND SECURITY ENGINEERING III, 2009, 108 : 173 - 184
  • [42] Selecting representative geological realizations to model subsurface CO2 storage under uncertainty
    Mahjour, Seyed Kourosh
    Faroughi, Salah A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2023, 127
  • [43] Uncertainty theories applied to the analysis of CO2 plume extension during geological storage
    Bellenfant, Gael
    Guyonnet, Dominique
    Dubois, Didier
    Bouc, Olivier
    GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES 9, 2009, 1 (01): : 2447 - 2454
  • [44] Biosphere risk assessment for CO2 storage projects
    Bowden, Adrian R.
    Pershke, Donna F.
    Chalaturnyk, Rick
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2013, 16 : S291 - S308
  • [45] Towards guidelines for selection, characterization and qualification of sites and projects for geological storage of CO2
    Aarnes, Jorg E.
    Selmer-Olsen, Stale
    Carpenter, Michael E.
    Flach, Todd A.
    GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES 9, 2009, 1 (01): : 1735 - 1742
  • [46] A multi-criteria approach to the selection of geological storage of CO2 sites in Peru
    Carlotto, Victor
    Duenas, Alexis
    Ingol-Blanco, Eusebio
    Santa-Cruz, Sandra
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2022, 114
  • [47] Potential Sites for Underground Energy and CO2 Storage in Greece: A Geological and Petrological Approach
    Arvanitis, Apostolos
    Koutsovitis, Petros
    Koukouzas, Nikolaos
    Tyrologou, Pavlos
    Karapanos, Dimitris
    Karkalis, Christos
    Pomonis, Panagiotis
    ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (11)
  • [48] Global analysis of geological CO2 storage by pressure-limited injection sites
    Smith, Alexandra
    Hampson, Gary
    Krevor, Sam
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2024, 137
  • [49] Dealing with uncertainty in risk assessments in early stages of a CO2 geological storage project: comparison of pure-probabilistic and fuzzy-probabilistic frameworks
    Loschetter, A.
    Rohmer, J.
    de Lary, L.
    Manceau, J. C.
    STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2016, 30 (03) : 813 - 829
  • [50] Dealing with uncertainty in risk assessments in early stages of a CO2 geological storage project: comparison of pure-probabilistic and fuzzy-probabilistic frameworks
    A. Loschetter
    J. Rohmer
    L. de Lary
    J. C. Manceau
    Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2016, 30 : 813 - 829