Barriers and Opportunities for Patient-Reported Outcome Implementation: A National Pediatrician Survey in the United States

被引:12
|
作者
Chen, Ming [1 ]
Jones, Conor M. [2 ]
Bauer, Hailey E. [3 ]
Osakwe, Onyekachukwu [4 ]
Ketheeswaran, Pavinarmatha [5 ]
Baker, Justin N. [6 ]
Huang, I-Chan [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, Ctr Hlth Sci, Coll Med, Memphis, TN 38163 USA
[2] Cornell Univ, Weill Med Coll, New York, NY 10021 USA
[3] St Jude Childrens Res Hosp, Dept Epidemiol & Canc Control, 332 N Lauderdale St, Memphis, TN 38105 USA
[4] Univ Mississippi, Sch Med, Jackson, MS 39216 USA
[5] Brown Univ, Alpert Brown Med Sch, Providence, RI 02903 USA
[6] St Jude Childrens Res Hosp, Dept Oncol, 332 N Lauderdale St, Memphis, TN 38105 USA
来源
CHILDREN-BASEL | 2022年 / 9卷 / 02期
关键词
barrier; implementation; patient-reported outcomes; pediatrics; physician survey; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; CLINICAL-PRACTICE; RESPONSE RATES; HEALTH-CARE; PHYSICIAN COMMUNICATION; CANCER CARE; CHILDREN; PROFESSIONALS; INSTRUMENTS; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.3390/children9020185
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Purpose: To characterize pediatricians' perceived barriers and areas of confidence in assessing patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in the U.S., and to test associations of these factors with implementing PRO assessment. Methods: Using a random sample from the members of American Medical Association, we recruited general pediatricians and pediatric subspecialists to complete a survey (July 2011 to December 2013). Perceived barriers and confidence in PRO assessment were compared by age, pediatric specialty (general pediatrics, seven subspecialties), practice settings (academic, private), and region of practice. Multivariable logistic regressions tested associations of demographic factors, barriers, and confidence factors with the implementation of PRO assessment. Findings: The survey was completed by 458 participants (response rate 48.5%); of these, 40.4%, 15.9%, 15.5%, and 8.1% were general pediatricians, cardiology, hematology/oncology, and pulmonary specialists, respectively. PRO assessment was implemented by 29.0% of the pediatricians. The top five barriers for PRO assessment included limited time/manpower (79.0%), limited training (77.4%), lengthy PRO instruments (76%), lack of meaningful cut-offs on PRO scores (75.5%), and unavailable PRO instruments (75.0%). Limited knowledge of PROs (OR 4.10; 95% CI 2.21, 7.60) and unavailability of PRO instruments (OR 1.87; 95% CI 1.01, 3.49) increased the odds of not implementing the assessment, whereas confidence in PRO assessments compatible with norms (OR 0.41; 95% CI 0.23, 0.72) and perceived benefit over clinical judgment alone (OR 0.53; 95% CI 0.31, 0.93) decreased the odds of not implementing the assessment. Interpretation: significant barriers to PRO assessment in pediatric settings suggest the need for providing training, resources, and practical guidance toward implementation. Patient or Public Contribution: healthcare service users contributed to this study by completing a survey and providing feedback about the barriers and areas of confidence in assessing PROs for pediatric populations.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Patient-Reported Outcomes (Pros) and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (Proms)
    Weldring, Theresa
    Smith, Sheree M. S.
    HEALTH SERVICES INSIGHTS, 2013, 6 : 61 - 68
  • [42] Toward System-Wide Implementation of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: A Framework for Countries, States, and Regions
    Ernst, Sophie-Christin Kornelia
    Steinbeck, Viktoria
    Busse, Reinhard
    Pross, Christoph
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (09) : 1539 - 1547
  • [43] EVIDENCE FOR VALIDITY OF A NATIONAL PATIENT-REPORTED SURVEY IN CHINA: THE CHINA NATIONAL HEALTH AND WELLNESS SURVEY
    DiBonaventura, M. D.
    Liu, G. G.
    Stankus, A.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2012, 15 (07) : A647 - A647
  • [44] EVIDENCE FOR VALIDITY OF A NATIONAL PATIENT-REPORTED SURVEY IN JAPAN: THE JAPAN NATIONAL HEALTH AND WELLNESS SURVEY
    Dibonaventura, M. D.
    Fukuda, T.
    Stankus, A.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2012, 15 (07) : A646 - A647
  • [45] EVIDENCE FOR VALIDITY OF A NATIONAL PHYSICIAN AND PATIENT-REPORTED SURVEY IN CHINA AND UNITED KINGDOM: THE DISEASE SPECIFIC PROGRAMME
    Babineaux, S. M.
    Curtis, B. H.
    Holbrook, T.
    Liu, L.
    Colclough, H.
    Piercy, J.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2014, 17 (07) : A728 - A728
  • [46] Patient-reported outcome measurement
    Goodare, Heather
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE, 2010, 103 (07) : 264 - 264
  • [47] Patient-reported outcome measures
    Ribeiro, Bernard
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE, 2007, 100 (09) : 397 - 397
  • [48] PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME LABELING FOR RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS DRUGS APPROVED IN THE UNITED STATES: 2010-2019
    Zettler, M.
    Brown-Bickerstaff, C.
    Savill, K.
    Gajra, A.
    Feinberg, B.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2021, 24 : S142 - S143
  • [49] Survey on the Implementation of National Equine Identification in the United States
    Vanderman, K. S.
    Swinker, Ann M.
    Gill, B. E.
    Radhakrishna, R. B.
    Kniffen, D. M.
    Staniar, W. B.
    McKernan, H. B.
    Miller, R. C.
    JOURNAL OF EQUINE VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2009, 29 (12) : 819 - 822
  • [50] PSYCHOMETRIC VALIDATION OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES OF PAIN IN UNITED STATES PATIENTS WITH SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS
    Naegeli, A. N.
    Al Sawah, S.
    Tomaszewski, E. L.
    Gemmen, E.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2014, 17 (03) : A194 - A194