Test-retest reliability and measurement error of the modified gait efficacy scale in individuals with stroke

被引:5
|
作者
Avelino, Patrick R. [1 ]
Nascimento, Lucas R. [1 ,2 ]
Menezes, Kenia K. P. [1 ]
Alvarenga, Maria Tereza Mota [1 ]
Faria Fortini, Iza [3 ]
Teixeira-Salmela, Luci F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Minas Gerais, Dept Phys Therapy, NeuroGrp, Ave Antonio Carlos, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Espirito Santo, Discipline Phys Therapy, Ctr Hlth Sci, Vitoria, ES, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Minas Gerais, Dept Occupat Therapy, Ave Antonio Carlos 667,Campus Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
关键词
Stroke; gait; self efficacy; outcome assessment; SMALLEST REAL DIFFERENCE; ABILHAND QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; POPULATION; ABILITY;
D O I
10.1080/09593985.2021.1952669
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Purpose To investigate the test-retest reliability and measurement error of the Brazilian version of the modified Gait Efficacy scale (mGES-Brazil) in individuals who have had stroke. Methods The mGES-Brazil was applied on two occasions, five to seven days apart, in a research laboratory setting. Test-retest reliability and measurement error, which included the standard error of measurement (SEM), smallest detectable change (SDC), and analysis of the limits of agreement by the Bland-Altman plots, were examined. Results Fifty individuals who have had stroke (18 men), with a mean age of 64 +/- 11 years, were evaluated. All individual items showed good reliability (Intra-class Correlation Coefficient - ICC2,1 > 0.90). The ICC was 0.98 (95% CI 0.97 to 0.99) and the Bland and Altman plots revealed no systematic changes in the mean test-retest scores. The SEM (SEM%) was 3 (5%), within the recommended values, while the SDC was 8 points. Conclusion The mGES-Brazil demonstrated to be reliable to be applied within clinical and research contexts for the assessment of changes in walking confidence of individuals who have had stroke. Changes in mGES scores >= 8 points reflect real changes.
引用
收藏
页码:2956 / 2961
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Internal and test-retest reliability of the modified Stroop and the disengagement task
    Ataya, A.
    Adams, S.
    Attwood, A. S.
    Munafo, M. R.
    EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2013, 23 : S553 - S553
  • [42] Test-Retest Reliability and Efficacy of Individual Symptoms in Concussion Management
    Caccese, Jaclyn B.
    Garcia, Gian-Gabriel P.
    Kontos, Anthony P.
    Port, Nicholas
    Valerio, Kate
    Broglio, Steven P.
    McCrea, Michael
    McAllister, Thomas W.
    Pasquina, Paul F.
    Buckley, Thomas A.
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF SPORT MEDICINE, 2023, 33 (01): : 52 - 60
  • [43] Test-retest Reliability And Efficacy Of Individual Symptoms In Concussion Management
    Caccese, Jaclyn B.
    Garcia, Gian-Gabriel P.
    Kontos, Anthony P.
    Port, Nicholas
    Valerio, Kate
    Broglio, Steven P.
    McCrea, Michael
    McAllister, Thomas W.
    Pasquina, Paul F.
    Buckley, Thomas A.
    MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS & EXERCISE, 2022, 54 (09) : 66 - 66
  • [44] Test-retest reliability of the ASES-p shoulder scale
    Vrotsou, Kalliopi
    Cuellar, Ricardo
    Silio, Felix
    Garay, Daniel
    Busto, Gorka
    Escobar, Antonio
    MUSCULOSKELETAL SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2019, 42 : 134 - 137
  • [45] Test-retest reliability of the Salutogenic Wellness Promotion Scale (SWPS)
    Anderson, L. M.
    Moore, J. B.
    Hayden, B. M.
    Becker, C. M.
    HEALTH EDUCATION JOURNAL, 2014, 73 (01) : 101 - 108
  • [46] TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY STUDY OF THE WECHSLER ADULT INTELLIGENCE SCALE
    BROWN, HSR
    MAY, AE
    JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1979, 47 (03) : 601 - 602
  • [47] TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY OF THE REVISED CHILDRENS MANIFEST ANXIETY SCALE
    WISNIEWSKI, JJ
    GENSHAFT, JL
    MULICK, JA
    COURY, DL
    PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 1987, 65 (01) : 67 - 70
  • [48] INTERNAL CONSISTENCY AND TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY OF THE NEED FOR COGNITION SCALE
    SADOWSKI, CJ
    GULGOZ, S
    PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 1992, 74 (02) : 610 - 610
  • [49] Test-retest reliability of the Friedreich's ataxia rating scale
    Rummey, Christian
    Zesiewicz, Theresa A.
    Perez-Lloret, Santiago
    Farmer, Jennifer M.
    Pandolfo, Massimo
    Lynch, David R.
    ANNALS OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL NEUROLOGY, 2020, 7 (09): : 1708 - 1712
  • [50] The scale for assessing emotional disturbance: Test-retest and interrater reliability
    Epstein, MH
    Cullinan, D
    Harniss, MK
    Ryser, G
    BEHAVIORAL DISORDERS, 1999, 24 (03) : 222 - 230