The Flexibility Fix: Low-Carbon Energy Transition in the United Kingdom and the Spatiotemporality of Capital

被引:9
|
作者
Angel, James [1 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, Dept Geog, London WC2B 4BG, England
关键词
capitalism; electricity system flexibility; energy; socioecological fix; spatiotemporality; RESOURCE GEOGRAPHIES; MATERIAL WORLDS; INFRASTRUCTURE; METABOLISM;
D O I
10.1080/24694452.2021.1941745
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
The ongoing transition from fossil to renewable energy is said by many within the energy industry to require a more "flexible" electricity system. The suggestion is that the variability of renewable energy resources, alongside the increasing load placed on the electricity grid by decentralized renewable generation and the electrification of heat and transport, requires an enhanced capacity to change the spatial and temporal profiles of electricity supply and demand. Drawing on research within the UK electricity sector, this article contends that electricity flexibility schemes might constitute a socioecological fix for capitalism. I discuss Andreas Malm's claim that the spatiotemporality of renewable energy presents a limit to capital accumulation and suggest that this is a limit that UK flexibility initiatives seek to overcome. The article concludes by suggesting that electricity system flexibility should not be written off as an inherently reactionary sociotechnical project by virtue of its apparent enrollment within the reproduction of exploitative capitalist relations. Rather, I call attention to the political flexibility of electricity system flexibility and, in doing so, further develop ongoing attempts to theorize the socioecological fix in a more politicized manner.
引用
收藏
页码:914 / 930
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Innovating for low-carbon energy through hydropower: Enabling a conservation charity's transition to a low-carbon community
    Gallagher, John
    Coughlan, Paul
    Williams, A. Prysor
    McNabola, Aonghus
    CREATIVITY AND INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2018, 27 (04) : 375 - 386
  • [42] Analysis of China's Low-Carbon Power Transition Path Considering Low-Carbon Energy Technology Innovation
    Xia, Peng
    Lu, Gang
    Yuan, Bo
    Gong, Yichun
    Chen, Haitao
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2025, 15 (01):
  • [43] Contestation, contingency, and justice in the Nordic low-carbon energy transition
    Sovacool, Benjamin K.
    ENERGY POLICY, 2017, 102 : 569 - 582
  • [44] Low-carbon transition risks in the energy sector: A systematic review
    Sun, Jie
    Yang, Yingkui
    Zhou, Peng
    SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2024, 50 : 115 - 127
  • [45] THE RENEWABLE ENERGY ADVENTURE AND A TRANSITION TO A LOW-CARBON SOUTH AFRICA
    Lloyd, P. J. D.
    2012 PROCEEDINGS OF THE 9TH INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL USE OF ENERGY CONFERENCE (ICUE), 2012,
  • [46] Rethinking the position of natural gas in a low-carbon energy transition
    Bugaje, Al-Amin B.
    Dioha, Michael O.
    Abraham-Dukuma, Magnus C.
    Wakil, Muhammad
    ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2022, 90
  • [47] Digital finance and the low-carbon energy transition (LCET) from the perspective of capital-biased technical progress
    Li, Guoxiang
    Wu, Haoyue
    Jiang, Jieshu
    Zong, Qingqing
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2023, 120
  • [48] Principles of sustainability and physics as a basis for the low-carbon energy transition
    Ringrose, Philip S.
    PETROLEUM GEOSCIENCE, 2017, 23 (03) : 287 - 297
  • [49] Socioeconomic Factors Driving the Transition to a Low-Carbon Energy System
    Karasmanaki, Evangelia
    Galatsidas, Spyros
    Tsantopoulos, Georgios
    ENERGIES, 2024, 17 (14)
  • [50] Energy transition for the low-carbon pulp and paper industry in China
    Man, Yi
    Li, Jigeng
    Hong, Mengna
    Han, Yulin
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2020, 131