A Prospective, Open-Label Comparison of Tamsulosin plusSerenoa repensand Bovine Colostrum versus Tamsulosin Alone in the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

被引:2
|
作者
Di Maida, Fabrizio [1 ]
Mari, Andrea [1 ]
Rubino, Roberta [2 ]
Minervini, Andrea [1 ]
Carini, Marco [1 ]
Siena, Giampaolo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florence, Careggi Hosp, Dept Urol, Unit Oncol Minimally Invas Urol & Androl, Florence, Italy
[2] Univ Naples 2, Primo Policlin, Nutr Biol, Naples, Italy
关键词
Benign prostatic hyperplasia; Bovine colostrum; Lower urinary tract symptoms; Phytotherapy; Serenoa repens; URINARY-TRACT SYMPTOMS; SERENOA-REPENS; INFLAMMATION; MECHANISMS; EFFICACY; BPH;
D O I
10.1159/000503735
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective:To compare the efficacy and safety of oral supplementation withSerenoa repens(SR) and bovine colostrum (BC) plus tamsulosin (TAM) versus TAM alone over 12 months in men suffering from lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).Methods:Between February 2018 and February 2019, men with symptomatic BPH (IPSS >= 10) were prospectively recruited. This prospective, open-label, 12-month study included two different protocols: (1) group A, SR 320 mg/day + BC 30 mg/day + TAM 0.4 mg/day, and (2) group B, TAM 0.4 mg/day only.Results:Overall, 148 patients entered the study, 76 in group A and 72 in group B. At 12 months, the total IPSS had decreased by 5.5 with TAM + SR + BC and by 5.1 with TAM only (p= 0.21). However, when the total IPSS was divided into storage and voiding subscores, at 6 months the storage symptoms had improved significantly more with TAM + SR + BC (-1.6 vs. -0.9 with TAM only,p= 0.02), with the benefit persisting also at the 1-year evaluation (-1.8 vs. -0.8,p= 0.02). Moreover, the improvement in LUTS-related quality of life (QoL) was significantly different between the groups, with a mean decrease in IPSS QoL subscore of -2.5 +/- 0.2 for TAM + SR + BC versus -1.8 +/- 0.3 for TAM at 6 months (p= 0.04), and of -2.9 +/- 0.4 for TAM + SR + BC versus -2.1 +/- 0.4 for TAM at 12 months (p= 0.04). Conversely, no significant differences were found in maximal urinary flow rate (p= 0.38), postvoid residual volume (p= 0.12), prostate-specific antigen (p= 0.41), and prostate volume (p= 0.16).Conclusion:Combination treatment with SR and BC plus TAM was shown to be more effective than treatment with TAM only in improving IPSS storage and QoL subscores in BPH patients after 6 months and up to 12 months of treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:351 / 355
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Long-term treatment outcome of tamsulosin for benign prostatic hyperplasia
    Ichioka, K
    Ohara, H
    Terada, N
    Matsui, Y
    Yoshimura, K
    Terai, A
    Arai, Y
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 11 (10) : 870 - 875
  • [12] Efficacy and safety of tamsulosin for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a meta analysis
    Ren Rui-min
    Kou Min
    Lan Xiao-xu
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 123 (02) : 234 - 238
  • [13] A COST-UTILITY ANALYSIS OF DUTASTERIDE PLUS TAMSULOSIN COMBINATION THERAPY VERSUS TAMSULOSIN MONOTHERAPY IN THE TREATMENT OF BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA IN IRAN
    Peikanpour, M.
    Sharif, Z.
    Moghadam, Foroughi M. J.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2017, 20 (09) : A490 - A491
  • [14] Tamsulosin and Solifenacin in the treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in combination with overactive bladder
    Wang, Hui
    Chang, Yanhua
    Liang, Hui
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2017, 33 (04) : 988 - 992
  • [15] Comparison of tamsulosin and naftopidil for efficacy and safety in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomized controlled trial
    Gotoh, M
    Kamihira, O
    Kinukawa, T
    Ono, Y
    Ohshima, S
    Origasa, H
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 96 (04) : 581 - 586
  • [16] Evaluation of silodosin in comparison to tamsulosin in benign prostatic hyperplasia: A randomized controlled trial
    Pande, Satabdi
    Hazra, Avijit
    Kundu, Anup Kumar
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 2014, 46 (06) : 601 - 607
  • [17] TAMSULOSIN VERSUS TRANSURETHRAL PROSTATECTOMY IN THE TREATMENT OF NOCTURIA IN MEN WITH BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA AS ONLY CAUSAL FACTOR: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL
    Simaioforidis, V.
    Chrisofos, M.
    Papatsoris, A.
    Kontos, S.
    Koritsiadis, S.
    Deliveliotis, C.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2010, 9 (02) : 311 - 311
  • [18] An open-label, prospective interventional study of the tolerability and efficacy of 0.4 mg oral tamsulosin oral controlled absorption system in men with lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia who are unsatisfied with treatment with 0.2 mg tamsulosin
    Yang, Pei-Shan
    Chen, Chien-Lun
    Hou, Chen-Pang
    Lin, Yu-Hsiang
    Tsui, Ke-Hung
    CLINICAL INTERVENTIONS IN AGING, 2018, 13 : 235 - 242
  • [19] Cost-effectiveness of tamsulosin, doxazosin and terazosin in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia
    Ohsfeldt, RL
    Kreder, KJ
    Klein, R
    Chrischilles, EC
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2003, 6 (03) : 288 - 288
  • [20] Cost-effectiveness of tamsulosin, doxazosin and terazosin in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia
    Ohsfeldt, RL
    Kreder, KJ
    Klein, RW
    Chrischilles, EA
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 169 (04): : 345 - 345