Risk-averse flexible policy on ambulance allocation in humanitarian operations under uncertainty

被引:8
|
作者
Yu, Guodong [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Aijun [3 ]
Sun, Huiping [1 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ, Sch Management, Jinan, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Univ, Shandong Key Lab Social Supernetwork Computat & D, Jinan, Peoples R China
[3] Xidian Univ, Dept Management Engn, Sch Econ & Management, Xian, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Ambulance operations; dispatching and relocation; Markov decision process; stochastic dominance; MODEL; OPTIMIZATION; PERFORMANCE; VEHICLE; RELOCATION; DECISIONS; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1080/00207543.2020.1735663
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Proactive ambulance management is constructive to improve the response efficiency for emergency medical service (EMS) systems under uncertainty. In this paper, we present a dynamic optimisation model concerning the ambulance dispatching and relocation. We develop a flexible operation policy driven by the interval rolling to match vehicles with calls in batch. We formulate the problem in Markov Decision Process and incorporate queues to minimise the average response and delay time. Considering the curse-of-dimensionality, we provide a simulation-based empirical dynamic programming with the state aggregation and post-decision state to solve the model. To further accelerate the computational efficiency, a greedy heuristic method is introduced to improve the quality of sampling operations. Then, a risk-averse model is developed based on the stochastic dominance strategy to improve operational reliability. We develop an equivalent linear programming to evaluate concave dominating functions. We test the performance by a numerical case and extract managerial insights for practitioners. Our results show that the proposed flexible and risk-averse solution outperforms the classic model on reducing the delay under uncertain calls. And the improvement is more active during peak hours, when real-time needs exceed available ambulances.
引用
收藏
页码:2588 / 2610
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Online Risk-Averse Resource Allocation in Queuing Networks
    Yu, Guodong
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2023, 70 (01) : 184 - 195
  • [22] Risk-averse Ambulance Redeployment via Multi-armed Bandits
    Sahin, Umitcan
    Yucesoy, Veysel
    Koc, Aykut
    Tekin, Cem
    2018 26TH SIGNAL PROCESSING AND COMMUNICATIONS APPLICATIONS CONFERENCE (SIU), 2018,
  • [23] Solving House Allocation Problems with Risk-Averse Agents
    Andersson, Tommy
    Andersson, Christer
    COMPUTATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 33 (04) : 389 - 401
  • [24] Stackelberg Game of Buyback Policy in Supply Chain with a Risk-Averse Retailer and a Risk-Averse Supplier Based on CVaR
    Zhou, Yanju
    Chen, Qian
    Chen, Xiaohong
    Wang, Zongrun
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (09):
  • [25] The firm under uncertainty with general risk-averse preferences: A state-contingent approach
    Quiggin, J
    Chambers, RG
    JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 2001, 22 (01) : 5 - 20
  • [26] Coordinating a Supply Chain with Risk-Averse Agents under Demand and Consumer Returns Uncertainty
    Liu, Jian
    He, Yong
    MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2013, 2013
  • [27] Primal-Dual Learning Based Risk-Averse Optimal Integrated Allocation of Hybrid Energy Generation Plants under Uncertainty
    Zhao, Xiao
    Xia, Xuhui
    Yu, Guodong
    ENERGIES, 2019, 12 (12)
  • [28] On preparedness resource allocation planning for natural disaster relief under endogenous uncertainty with time-consistent risk-averse management
    Escudero, Laureano E.
    Araceli Garin, M.
    Monge, Juan F.
    Unzueta, Aitziber
    COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2018, 98 : 84 - 102
  • [29] Price and service competition of supply chains with risk-averse retailers under demand uncertainty
    Xiao, Tiaojun
    Yang, Danqin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2008, 114 (01) : 187 - 200
  • [30] A risk-averse optimization model for trading wind energy in a market environment under uncertainty
    Pousinho, H. M. I.
    Mendes, V. M. F.
    Catalao, J. P. S.
    ENERGY, 2011, 36 (08) : 4935 - 4942