An Unsupervised Approach for Cause-Effect Relation Extraction from Biomedical Text

被引:4
|
作者
Sharma, Raksha [1 ]
Palshikar, Girish [1 ]
Pawar, Sachin [1 ]
机构
[1] Tata Consultancy Serv, TCS Res, Pune, Maharashtra, India
关键词
Cause-effect relation; Causative verbs; Relation extraction; Biomedical domain; Leukemia; PMI; Hypernyms;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-319-91947-8_43
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Identification of Cause-effect (CE) relation mentions, along with the arguments, are crucial for creating a scientific knowledge-base. Linguistically complex constructs are used to express CE relations in text, mainly using generic causative (causal) verbs (cause, lead, result etc). We observe that some generic verbs have a domain-specific causative sense (inhibit, express) and some domains have altogether new causative verbs (down-regulate). Not every mention of a generic causative verb (e.g., lead) indicates a CE relation mention. We propose a linguistically-oriented unsupervised iterative co-discovery approach to identify domain-specific causative verbs, starting from a small set of seed causative verbs and an unlabeled corpus. We use known causative verbs to extract CE arguments, and use known CE arguments to discover causative verbs (hence co-discovery). Since causes and effects are typically agents, events, actions, or conditions, we use WordNet hypernym categories to identify suitable CE arguments. PMI is used to measure linguistic associations between a causative verb and its argument. Once we have a list of domain-specific causative verbs, we use it to extract CE relation mentions from a given corpus in an unsupervised manner, filtering out non-causative use of a causative verb using WordNet hypernym check of its arguments. Our approach extracts 256 domain-specific causative verbs from 10, 000 PubMed abstracts of Leukemia papers, and outperforms several baselines for extracting intra-sentence CE relation mentions.
引用
收藏
页码:419 / 427
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Leveraging Two-Stream Cause-Effect Relation for Emotion-Cause Analysis
    Ran, Junfeng
    Tian, Zailong
    Luo, Weiyao
    Li, Sujian
    NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING AND CHINESE COMPUTING, PT IV, NLPCC 2024, 2025, 15362 : 426 - 439
  • [32] Knowledge-Augmented Language Models for Cause-Effect Relation Classification
    Hosseini, Pedram
    Broniatowski, David A.
    Diab, Mona
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIRST WORKSHOP ON COMMONSENSE REPRESENTATION AND REASONING (CSRR 2022), 2022, : 43 - 48
  • [33] A flexible nonlinear approach to represent cause-effect relationships in FCMs
    Ketipi, Maria K.
    Koulouriotis, Dimitrios E.
    Karakasis, Evangelos G.
    Papakostas, George A.
    Tourassis, Vassilios D.
    APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2012, 12 (12) : 3757 - 3770
  • [34] Coreference based event-argument relation extraction on biomedical text
    Yoshikawa K.
    Riedel S.
    Hirao T.
    Asahara M.
    Matsumoto Y.
    Journal of Biomedical Semantics, 2 (Suppl 5)
  • [35] A Relation Extraction Framework for Biomedical Text Using Hybrid Feature Set
    Muzaffar, Abdul Wahab
    Azam, Farooque
    Qamar, Usman
    COMPUTATIONAL AND MATHEMATICAL METHODS IN MEDICINE, 2015, 2015
  • [36] Towards Deriving Conclusions from Cause-effect Relations
    Fandinno, Jorge
    FUNDAMENTA INFORMATICAE, 2016, 147 (01) : 93 - 131
  • [37] Test input generation from cause-effect graphs
    Ufuktepe, Deniz Kavzak
    Ayav, Tolga
    Belli, Fevzi
    SOFTWARE QUALITY JOURNAL, 2021, 29 (04) : 733 - 782
  • [38] Drug-Drug Interaction Extraction from Biomedical Text Using Relation BioBERT with BLSTM
    KafiKang, Maryam
    Hendawi, Abdeltawab
    MACHINE LEARNING AND KNOWLEDGE EXTRACTION, 2023, 5 (02): : 669 - 683
  • [39] Semantic relation extraction aware of N-gram features from unstructured biomedical text
    Wang, Zheng
    Xu, Shuo
    Zhu, Lijun
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2018, 86 : 59 - 70
  • [40] Unsupervised Relation Extraction from Web Documents
    Eichler, Kathrin
    Hemsen, Holmer
    Neumann, Guenter
    SIXTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LANGUAGE RESOURCES AND EVALUATION, LREC 2008, 2008, : 1674 - 1679