CT/MRI LI-RADS version 2018 versus CEUS LI-RADS version 2017 in the diagnosis of primary hepatic nodules in patients with high-risk hepatocellular carcinoma

被引:18
|
作者
Lv, Kun [1 ,2 ]
Cao, Xin [1 ,3 ]
Dong, Yinlei [4 ]
Geng, Daoying [1 ,3 ]
Zhang, Jun [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Huashan Hosp, Dept Radiol, 12 Wulumuqi Middle Rd, Shanghai 200040, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Inst Funct & Mol Med Imaging, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Ctr Shanghai Intelligent Imaging Crit Brain Dis E, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Fudan Univ, Huashan Hosp, Pancreat Dis Inst, Dept Pancreat Surg, Shanghai, Peoples R China
关键词
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); computed tomography; magnetic resonance imaging; ultrasonography; CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA; CIRRHOSIS;
D O I
10.21037/atm-21-1035
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: This study aimed to explore the application value of computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (CT/MRI) liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) version 2018 and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) LI-RADS version 2017 in high-risk hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients and to conduct a comparative analysis. Methods: This study enrolled 250 high-risk HCC patients with 259 primary hepatic nodules from June 2017 to June 2020. Two investigators used a single-blind method to classify all nodules. The u-test, t-test, and Kappa test were performed. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value and receiver operating characteristic curves of LR-5 and LR-M in the diagnosis of HCC and non-HCC malignancy were respectively calculated. Results: CT/MRI LI-RADS v2018 and CEUS LI-RADS v2017 showed substantial agreement interobservers, and there was a moderate agreement inter-modality. The specificity and PPV of HCC and non-HCC malignancies in CT/MRI LR-5/M were higher than CEUS. The areas under the curve (AUC) of CT/MRI LR-5 and LR-M were 0.794 and 0.777, and the AUC of CEUS LR-5 and LR-M were 0.720 and 0.718, respectively. Conclusions: Two modalities have substantial agreement inter-observers and moderate agreement intermodalities. The diagnostic accuracy of HCC of CT/MRI LR-5 and non-HCC malignancy of CT/MRI LR-M are higher than CEUS.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Imaging diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: LI-RADS
    Cunha, Guilherme Moura
    Sirlin, Claude B.
    Fowler, Kathryn J.
    CHINESE CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 10 (01)
  • [32] The Value of CEUS LI-RADS combined with AFP in early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in low- and high-risk patients
    Wu, Yafei
    Chen, Yuanyuan
    Wei, Lili
    Ding, Zhanling
    Zhao, Shengfa
    Bao, Shengxian
    Tang, Jiali
    Li, Hang
    Liu, Junjie
    Zhu, Shangyong
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2024, 20 (04) : 1274 - 1283
  • [33] Usefulness of Modified CEUS LI-RADS for the Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Sonazoid
    Sugimoto, Katsutoshi
    Kakegawa, Tatsuya
    Takahashi, Hiroshi
    Tomita, Yusuke
    Abe, Masakazu
    Yoshimasu, Yu
    Takeuchi, Hirohito
    Kasai, Yoshitaka
    Itoi, Takao
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2020, 10 (10)
  • [34] Clinicoradiographic predictors of progression of an intermediate hepatic lesion (LI-RADS 3) to hepatocellular carcinoma (LI-RADS 5)
    Hannan, Lindsay M.
    Ojeda, Patricia I.
    Mieloszyk, Rebecca J.
    Harris, William P.
    Park, James O.
    Bhargava, Puneet
    HEPATOMA RESEARCH, 2021, 7 : 7 - 78
  • [35] Analysis of comparative performance of CEUS and CECT/MR LI-RADS classification: Can CEUS dichotomize LI-RADS indeterminate lesions on CT or MRI?
    Tan, Zehao
    Teoh, Wey Chyi
    Wong, Kang Min
    Wansaicheong, Gervais Khin-Lin
    Sandrasegaran, Kumaresan
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2020, 62 : 63 - 68
  • [36] New Progress toward Validation of LI-RADS Version 2018
    Furlan, Alessandro
    RADIOLOGY, 2019, 291 (01) : 80 - 81
  • [37] An update for LI-RADS: Version 2018. Why so soon after version 2017?
    Kielar, Ania Z.
    Chernyak, Victoria
    Bashir, Mustafa R.
    Do, Richard K.
    Fowler, Kathryn J.
    Santillan, Cynthia
    Sirlin, Claude B.
    Mitchell, Donald G.
    Cerny, Milena
    Tang, An
    Elsayes, Khaled M.
    Kamaya, Aya
    Kono, Yuko
    Arora, Sandeep S.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2019, 50 (06) : 1990 - 1991
  • [39] LI-RADS Version 2018 for MRI and CT: Interreader Agreement in Real-World Practice
    Galgano, Samuel J.
    Smith, Elainea N.
    RADIOLOGY, 2023, 307 (05)
  • [40] Performance of LI-RADS Version 2018 on CT for Determining Eligibility for Liver Transplant According to Milan Criteria in Patients at High Risk for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Bae, Jae Seok
    Lee, Dong Ho
    Lee, Sang Min
    Suh, Kyung-Suk
    Lee, Kwang-Woong
    Yi, Nam-Joon
    Lee, Kyoung Bun
    Kim, Haeryoung
    Han, Joon Koo
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2022, 219 (01) : 86 - 96