Indoor cycling training in rehabilitation of patients after myocardial infarction

被引:5
|
作者
Gloc, Dagmara [1 ]
Nowak, Zbigniew [2 ]
Nowak-Lis, Agata [2 ]
Gabrys, Tomasz [3 ]
Szmatlan-Gabrys, Urszula [4 ]
Valach, Peter [3 ]
Pilis, Anna [5 ]
机构
[1] Silesian Ctr Rehabil & Prevent, PL-43450 Ustron, Poland
[2] Jerzy Kukuczka Acad Phys Educ, Dept Physiotherapy, PL-40065 Katowice, Poland
[3] Univ West Bohemia, Sport Ctr, Fac Pedag, Plzen 30100, Czech Republic
[4] Univ Phys Educ, Fac Rehabil, Dept Anat, PL-31571 Krakow, Poland
[5] Jan Dlugosz Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, PL-42200 Czestochowa, Poland
关键词
Myocardial infarction; Cardiac rehabilitation; Indoor cycling; CARDIAC REHABILITATION; EXERCISE; CAPACITY; DIET;
D O I
10.1186/s13102-021-00379-w
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Background Standard endurance training used from the second stage of cardiac rehabilitation has many common features with indoor cycling training which is used in fitness clubs. In the study, an attempt was made to evaluate the usefulness of this form of training in a 24-day rehabilitation program for patients after myocardial infarction. The study examined a group of 64 patients (51.34 +/- 8.02 years) who were divided into two groups: the IC group (32 patients aged 53.40 +/- 4.31 years) with indoor cycling training instead of standard endurance training; and the ST group (32 patients aged 55.31 +/- 6.45 years) performing standard training. The level of exercise tolerance (cardiopulmonary exercise testing on a treadmill-Bruce's protocol), hemodynamic indicators of the left ventricle (echocardiography) and blood lipid profile (laboratory test) were assessed. Results In the IC group there was a significant increase in the test duration (9.21 +/- 2.02 vs 11.24 +/- 1.26 min; p < 0.001), the MET value (9.16 +/- 1.30 vs 10.73 +/- 1.23; p = 0.006) and VO(2)max (37.27 +/- 3.23 vs 39.10 +/- 3.17 ml/kg/min; p < 0.001). Parallel changes were observed in the ST group, where the following parameters improved: the test duration (9.41 +/- 0.39 vs 10.91 +/- 2.22; p < 0.001), MET value (8.65 +/- 0.25 vs 9.86 +/- 1.12; p = 0.002) and VO(2)max (36.89 +/- 6.22 vs 38.76 +/- 3.44; p < 0.001). No statistically significant changes were found in the hemodynamic indices of the left ventricle and the lipid profile. Also, the intergroup analysis did not show any statistical significance. Conclusion Based on the research results, it was found that indoor cycling training in the second phase of cardiac rehabilitation is a safe form of therapy and therefore may be an interesting alternative method to the classic bicycle ergometer exercise in the stage of early cardiac rehabilitation.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] REHABILITATION AFTER MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION
    BETHELL, HJN
    LANCET, 1982, 1 (8265): : 231 - 231
  • [22] REHABILITATION AFTER MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION
    NAGLE, R
    PICTONRO.I
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE-LONDON, 1972, 65 (04): : 327 - &
  • [23] REHABILITATION AFTER MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION
    CRAWLEY, MA
    SMITH, IR
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE-LONDON, 1974, 67 (06): : 490 - 494
  • [24] REHABILITATION AFTER MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION
    WARSHAW, LJ
    ARCHIVES OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 1965, 10 (01): : 109 - 112
  • [25] Rehabilitation after Acute Myocardial Infarction
    Reibis, R. K.
    Gaede-Illig, C.
    Voeller, H.
    REHABILITATION, 2014, 53 (03) : 191 - 201
  • [26] REHABILITATION AFTER A MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION
    BETHELL, H
    PRACTITIONER, 1989, 233 (1464) : 335 - &
  • [27] REHABILITATION AFTER MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION
    POOLE, AP
    NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1980, 91 (659) : 362 - 362
  • [28] REHABILITATION AFTER MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION
    BETHELL, HJN
    NIXON, PGF
    LANCET, 1972, 1 (7740): : 49 - &
  • [29] Cardiac Rehabilitation After Myocardial Infarction
    Jneid, Hani
    JAMA CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 1 (09) : 978 - 979
  • [30] REHABILITATION AFTER MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION
    MACKINNON, AU
    LANCET, 1972, 1 (7743): : 205 - +