The Institutional Learning Curve of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy: Temporal Improvements in Cancer Detection in 4 Years

被引:73
|
作者
Meng, Xiaosong [1 ]
Rosenkrantz, Andrew B. [2 ]
Huang, Richard [1 ]
Deng, Fang-Ming [3 ]
Wysock, James S. [1 ]
Bjurlin, Marc A. [4 ]
Huang, William C. [1 ]
Lepor, Herbert [1 ]
Taneja, Samir S. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Langone Hlth, Dept Urol, 150 East 32nd St,2nd Floor, New York, NY 10016 USA
[2] NYU, Dept Radiol, Langone Hlth, 560 1St Ave, New York, NY 10016 USA
[3] NYU, Dept Pathol, Langone Hlth, 550 1St Ave, New York, NY 10016 USA
[4] NYU, Langone Hosp Brooklyn, Dept Urol, Brooklyn, NY USA
来源
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 2018年 / 200卷 / 05期
关键词
prostatic neoplasms; image-guided biopsy; magnetic resonance imaging; ultrasonography; learning curve; GUIDED BIOPSY; DATA SYSTEM; MEN; MRI;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2018.06.012
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: While magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy allows for improved detection of clinically significant prostate cancer, a concerning amount of clinically significant disease is still missed. We hypothesized that a number of these misses are due to the learning curve associated with magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy. We report the results of repeat magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy in men with continued suspicion for cancer and the institutional learning curve in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer with time. Materials and Methods: We analyzed the records of 1,813 prostate biopsies in a prospectively acquired cohort of men who presented for prostate biopsy in a 4year period. All men were offered prebiopsy magnetic resonance imaging and were assigned a maximum PI-RADS (TM) (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2) score. Biopsy outcomes in men with a suspicious region of interest were compared. The relationship between time and clinically significant prostate cancer detection was analyzed. Results: The clinically significant prostate cancer detection rate increased 26% with time in men with a PI-RADS 4/5 region of interest. On repeat magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy in men with continued suspicion for cancer 53% of those with a PI-RADS 4/5 region of interest demonstrated clinically significant discordance from the initial magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy compared to only 23% with a PI-RADS 1/2 region of interest. Significantly less clinically significant prostate cancer was missed or under graded in the most recent biopsies compared to the earliest biopsies. Conclusions: The high upgrade rate on repeat magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy and the increasing cancer detection rate with time show the significant learning curve associated with magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy. Men with low risk or negative biopsies with a persistent, concerning region of interest should be promptly rebiopsied. Improved targeting accuracy with operator experience can help decrease the number of missed cases of clinically significant prostate cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:1022 / 1028
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy for Prediction of Final Prostate Pathology
    Le, Jesse D.
    Stephenson, Samuel
    Brugger, Michelle
    Lu, David Y.
    Lieu, Patricia
    Sonn, Geoffrey A.
    Natarajan, Shyam
    Dorey, Frederick J.
    Huang, Jiaoti
    Margolis, Daniel J. A.
    Reiter, Robert E.
    Marks, Leonard S.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 192 (05): : 1367 - 1373
  • [22] Comparative Effectiveness of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Versus In-bore Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsy
    Ramos, Francisco
    Korets, Ruslan
    Fleishman, Aaron
    Kaul, Sumedh
    Johnson, Michael
    Wei, Jesse L.
    Olumi, Aria F.
    Tsai, Leo L.
    Gershman, Boris
    UROLOGY, 2023, 171 : 164 - 171
  • [23] Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy Improves but Does Not Replace Standard Template Biopsy for the Detection of Prostate Cancer
    Hanna, Nawar
    Wszolek, Matthew F.
    Mojtahed, Amirkasra
    Nicaise, Edouard
    Wu, Bo
    Gelpi-Hammerschmidt, Francisco J.
    Salari, Keyan
    Dahl, Douglas M.
    Blute, Michael L.
    Harisinghani, Mukesh
    Feldman, Adam S.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 202 (05): : 946 - 952
  • [24] Comparative Analysis of Transperineal Template Saturation Prostate Biopsy Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Biopsy with Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Guidance
    Radtke, Jan P.
    Kuru, Timur H.
    Boxler, Silvan
    Alt, Celine D.
    Popeneciu, Ionel V.
    Huettenbrink, Clemens
    Klein, Tilman
    Steinemann, Sarah
    Bergstraesser, Claudia
    Roethke, Matthias
    Roth, Wilfried
    Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter
    Hohenfellner, Markus
    Hadaschik, Boris A.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (01): : 87 - 94
  • [25] Detection of extraprostatic extension by transperineal multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion targeted combined with systemic template prostate biopsy
    Hao-Wen Chuang
    Shulin Wu
    Sharron X. Lin
    Ting Zhao
    Michelle M. Kim
    Mukesh Harisinghani
    Adam S. Feldman
    Douglas M. Dahl
    Chin-Lee Wu
    Diagnostic Pathology, 18
  • [26] Detection of extraprostatic extension by transperineal multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion targeted combined with systemic template prostate biopsy
    Chuang, Hao-Wen
    Wu, Shulin
    Lin, Sharron X.
    Zhao, Ting
    Kim, Michelle M.
    Harisinghani, Mukesh
    Feldman, Adam S.
    Dahl, Douglas M.
    Wu, Chin-Lee
    DIAGNOSTIC PATHOLOGY, 2023, 18 (01)
  • [27] Robot-assisted Magnetic Resonance Imaging-ultrasound Fusion Transperineal Targeted Biopsy
    Lee, Alvin Y. M.
    Chen, Kenneth
    Law, Yan Mee
    Ho, Henry S. S.
    Cheng, Christopher W. S.
    Yuen, John S. P.
    Tay, Kae Jack
    UROLOGY, 2021, 155 : 46 - 46
  • [28] The Learning Curve for Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy
    Kasabwala, Khushabu
    Patel, Neal
    Cricco-Lizza, Eliza
    Shimpi, Adrian A.
    Weng, Stanley
    Buchmann, Rose M.
    Motanagh, Samaneh
    Wu, Yiyuan
    Banerjee, Samprit
    Khani, Francesca
    Margolis, Daniel J.
    Robinson, Brian D.
    Hu, Jim C.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2019, 2 (02): : 135 - 140
  • [29] Prostate cancer risk stratification using magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion vs systematic prostate biopsy
    Khajir, Ghazal
    Press, Benjamin
    Lokeshwar, Soum
    Ghabili, Kamyar
    Rahman, Syed
    Gardezi, Mursal
    Washington, Samuel
    Cooperberg, Matthew R.
    Sprenkle, Preston
    Leapman, Michael S.
    JNCI CANCER SPECTRUM, 2023, 7 (06)
  • [30] Re: Comparative Analysis of Transperineal Template Saturation Prostate Biopsy Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Biopsy with Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Guidance
    Lazzeri, Massimo
    Lughezzani, Giovanni
    Guazzoni, Giorgio
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2015, 68 (03) : 535 - 536