Mitigation strategies using different methodologies to compare greenhouse gases

被引:0
|
作者
Fichtner, W [1 ]
Ardone, A [1 ]
Rentz, O [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Karlsruhe, Inst Industriebetriebslehre & Ind Prod, Karlsruhe, Germany
来源
GEFAHRSTOFFE REINHALTUNG DER LUFT | 2001年 / 61卷 / 10期
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Mitigation strategies for greenhouse gases (GHG) developed by using the PERSEUS-NAT model for Germany are presented. The model covers all relevant GHG emitting sectors in a bottom-up approach, thus making it possible to elaborate consistent, notional reduction strategies. The model results show that in the case without emission restrictions the CO2 emissions will decrease until the year 2010 due to a fuel switch to natural gas. After the year 2010 the CO2 emissions will rise because of increasing natural gas prices which are assumed in manyforecasts. As a result of these gas prices, hard coal power plants using imported coal are the most economical option to satisfy base load electricity demand. If CO2 reduction targets are introduced, one of the Most important reduction option in the electricity sector is to substitute natural gas for hard coal. This gas will especially be used in modem combined cycle power plants. Large CO2 reduction potentials can also be opened up by a rigorous realisation of insulation measures and the installation of natural gas condensing boilers. Taking into account other greenhouse gases the results vary strongly in reliance on the method used to compare the different gases (Global Warming Potential method or Radiative Forcing method).
引用
收藏
页码:459 / 464
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Greenhouse gases from animal husbandry: mitigation options
    Joachim Clemens
    Heinz-Jürgen Ahlgrimm
    Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2001, 60 : 287 - 300
  • [22] Greenhouse gases mitigation policies in the agriculture of Aragon, Spain
    Taher Kahil, Mohamed
    Albiac, Jose
    BIO-BASED AND APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2013, 2 (01): : 49 - 72
  • [23] Mitigation of greenhouse gases from agriculture: Role of models
    Schils, R. L. M.
    Ellis, J. L.
    De klein, C. A. M.
    Lesschen, J. P.
    Petersen, S. O.
    Sommer, S. G.
    ACTA AGRICULTURAE SCANDINAVICA SECTION A-ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2012, 62 (04): : 212 - 224
  • [24] Greenhouse gases mitigation option in the Mexican energy system
    Bauer, M
    Quintanilla, J
    GLOBAL ENERGY TRANSITIONS, WITH EMPHASIS ON THE LAST FIVE YEARS OF THE CENTURY: 19TH IAEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE, MAY 27-30, 1996, HOTEL ATRIUM HYATT, BUDAPEST, HUNGARY - CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 1996, : 177 - 183
  • [25] Waste treatment technologies and their influence on mitigation of greenhouse gases
    Hackl, AE
    GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, 1999, : 811 - 816
  • [26] Greenhouse gases from animal husbandry: mitigation options
    Clemens, J
    Ahlgrimm, HJ
    NUTRIENT CYCLING IN AGROECOSYSTEMS, 2001, 60 (1-3) : 287 - 300
  • [27] Mitigation of greenhouse gases by adoption of improved biomass cookstoves
    Panwar, N. L.
    Kurchania, A. K.
    Rathore, N. S.
    MITIGATION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGIES FOR GLOBAL CHANGE, 2009, 14 (06) : 569 - 578
  • [28] Sustainability and mitigation of greenhouse gases using ethyl beef tallow biodiesel in energy generation
    Pereira, Roberto Guimaraes
    Piamba Tulcan, Oscar Edwin
    Fellows, Carlos Eduardo
    Lameira, Valdir de Jesus
    Goncalves Quelhas, Osvaldo Luiz
    de Aguiar, Marcelo Elias
    do Espirito Santo Filho, Dalni Malta
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2012, 29-30 : 269 - 276
  • [29] Economic structure and strategies for greenhouse gas mitigation
    Minihan, Erin S.
    Wu, Ziping
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2012, 34 (01) : 350 - 357
  • [30] Greenhouse gas mitigation strategies and opportunities for agriculture
    Kwon, Hoyoung
    Liu, Xinyu
    Xu, Hui
    Wang, Michael
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2021, 113 (06) : 4639 - 4647