A Diagnostic Accuracy Meta-analysis of Endoanal Ultrasound and MRI for Perianal Fistula Assessment

被引:137
|
作者
Siddiqui, Muhammed R. S. [1 ,2 ]
Ashrafian, Hutan [2 ]
Tozer, Phil [1 ]
Daulatzai, Najib [1 ]
Burling, David [1 ]
Hart, Ailsa [1 ,2 ]
Athanasiou, Thanos [2 ]
Phillips, Robin K. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] St Marks Inst, Harrow HA1 3UJ, Middx, England
[2] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Dept Surg & Canc, London, England
关键词
Ultrasound; Endoanal; Magnetic resonance imaging; Perianal fistula; IN-ANO; CROHNS-DISEASE; ANAL ENDOSONOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND; ANORECTAL FISTULA; SURGICAL FINDINGS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; ABSCESS; FISTULOGRAPHY; SEPSIS;
D O I
10.1097/DCR.0b013e318249d26c
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Imaging modalities such as endoanal ultrasound or MRI can be useful preoperative adjuncts before the appropriate surgical intervention for perianal fistulas. OBJECTIVES: We present a systematic review of published literature comparing endoanal ultrasound with MRI for the assessment of idiopathic and Crohn's perianal fistulas. DESIGN: A meta-analysis was performed to obtain pooled values for specificity and sensitivity. SETTINGS: Electronic databases were searched from January 1970 to October 2010 for published studies. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS: Four studies were used in our analysis. There were 241 fistulas in the ultrasound group and 240 in the magnetic resonance group. RESULTS: The combined sensitivity and specificity of magnetic resonance for fistula detection were 0.87 (95% CI: 0.63-0.96) and 0.69 (95% CI: 0.51-0.82). There was a high degree of heterogeneity between studies reporting on MRI sensitivity (df = 3, I-2 = 93%). This compares to a sensitivity and specificity for endoanal ultrasound of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.70-0.95) and 0.43 (95% CI: 0.21-0.69). There was a high degree of heterogeneity between studies reporting on endoanal ultrasound sensitivity (df = 3, I-2 = 92%). CONCLUSIONS: From the available literature, the summarized performance characteristics for MRI and endoanal ultrasound demonstrate comparable sensitivities at detecting perianal fistulas, although the specificity for MRI was higher than that for endoanal ultrasound. Both specificity values are considered to be diagnostically poor, however. The high degree of data heterogeneity and the shortage of applicable studies precludes any firm conclusions being made for clinical practice. Future trials with improved study design (including prospective data collection and consideration of verification bias) may help to further clarify the role of MRI in the assessment and treatment response monitoring of perianal fistulas (particularly in patients with Crohn's disease).
引用
收藏
页码:576 / 585
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Confusion assessment method: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy
    Shi, Qiyun
    Warren, Laura
    Saposnik, Gustavo
    MacDermid, Joy C.
    NEUROPSYCHIATRIC DISEASE AND TREATMENT, 2013, 9 : 1359 - 1370
  • [42] Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasound for Assessment of Hemophilic Arthropathy: MRI Correlation
    Doria, Andrea S.
    Keshava, Shyamkumar N.
    Mohanta, Arun
    Jarrin, Jose
    Blanchette, Victor
    Srivastava, Alok
    Moineddin, Rahim
    Kavitha, M. L.
    Hilliard, Pamela
    Poonnoose, Pradeep
    Gibikote, Sridhar
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2015, 204 (03) : W336 - W347
  • [43] A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic test accuracy of diffusion weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient in differentiating active from inactive perianal fistula
    Inggriani, S.
    Rahmawati, D. L.
    Octavius, G. S.
    RADIOGRAPHY, 2025, 31 (02)
  • [44] Diagnostic ultrasound assessment of temporomandibular joints: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Almeida, Fabiana Tolentino
    Pacheco-Pereira, Camila
    Flores-Mir, Carlos
    Le, Lawrence H.
    Jaremko, Jacob L.
    Major, Paul W.
    DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2019, 48 (02)
  • [45] The application of MRI in perianal fistulae: assessing the diagnostic accuracy
    Dick, M.
    Narayanan, L.
    McKinley, A.
    Yule, S.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2010, 97 : 173 - 174
  • [46] Meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy: Just another meta-analysis?
    Lathyris, Dimitrios
    Haidich, Anna-Bettina
    INTENSIVE AND CRITICAL CARE NURSING, 2021, 64
  • [47] Accuracy of MRI, MR Arthrography, and Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Rotator Cuff Tears: A Meta-Analysis
    de Jesus, Joseph O.
    Parker, Laurence
    Frangos, Andrea J.
    Nazarian, Levon N.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2009, 192 (06) : 1701 - 1707
  • [48] Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) versus dynamic ultrasound for plantar plate injuries: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Albright, Rachel H.
    Brooks, Brandon
    Chingre, Manali
    Klein, Erin E.
    Weil, Lowell S., Jr.
    Fleischer, Adam E.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 152
  • [49] Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI for Detecting Cervical Invasion in Patients with Endometrial Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis
    Bi, Qiu
    Bi, Guoli
    Wang, Junna
    Zhang, Jie
    Li, Hongliang
    Gong, Xiarong
    Ren, Lixiang
    Wu, Kunhua
    JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2021, 12 (03): : 754 - 764
  • [50] EUS VERSUS MRI IN STAGING RECTAL ADENOCARCINOMA: A DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY META-ANALYSIS
    Chan, Brian P.
    Patel, Raxitkumar
    Yaghoobi, Mohammad
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 154 (06) : S661 - S662