Evaluation of a bundle of care to reduce incisional surgical site infection after gastrointestinal surgery

被引:4
|
作者
Phelan, Liam [1 ]
Dilworth, Mark P. [1 ]
Bhangu, Aneel [1 ]
Limbrick, Jack W. [1 ]
King, Stratton [1 ]
Bowley, Doug M. [1 ]
Hardy, Katie [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Birmingham NHS Fdn Trust, Heartlands Hosp, Bordesley Green East, Birmingham B9 5SS, W Midlands, England
关键词
Surgical wound infection; postoperative complications; surgical procedures; operative; mortality; standards;
D O I
10.1177/1757177419892072
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Surgical site infection (SSI) is associated with morbidity, mortality and increased care costs; many SSIs are considered preventable. The aim of the present study was to test implementation of a pragmatic, evidence-based bundle designed to reduce incisional SSI after emergency laparotomy and elective major lower gastrointestinal surgery. Method: This was a prospective before-and-after study. Data were collected before the intervention and for two separate subsequent time periods. An evidence-based bundle of care (BOC) was implemented; the primary outcome measure was incisional SSI at 30 days. The secondary outcome measure was 30-day unplanned readmissions. The initial post-intervention group, Group 2, assessed a variable number of potential impacting factors; however, due to funding and staffing levels the second post-bundle group, Group 3, focused on the core aspects of the BOC and rates of incisional SSI and readmission. Results: In total, 99 patients were included in the 'before' group; and 71 in Group 2 and 92 in Group 3, the post-intervention groups. The incisional SSI rate was 29.3% (29/99) before and 28.2% (20/71) in Group 2 (P=0.873) and 21.7% (20/92) in Group 3 (P=0.234) after the intervention. After adjustment for confounders, the care bundle was associated with a non-significant reduction in SSI (Group 2: odds ratio [OR] = 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.45-1.93, P=0.0843). However, it was associated with significantly reduced readmissions 18.1% (18/99) before versus 5.6% (4/71) in Group 2 (OR = 0.236, 95% CI = 0.077-0.72, P=0.012) and 8.7% (8/92) in Group 3 (OR = 0.38, 95% CI = 0.16-0.9, P=0.029). Comparing the pre-bundle group to the post-bundle groups, there was an overall significant reduction in readmissions (P=0.003). This implies a number needed to treat of 8-11 patients to prevent one readmission. Adherence to antibiotic prophylaxis with the Trust guidelines increased from 91% to 99% (1 vs. 2, P=0.047). Conclusion: Introduction of the bundle was associated with a reduction in the observed rate of incisional SSI from 29.3% to 21.7%; significantly fewer patients required unplanned readmission. Use of the bundle was associated with significantly improved compliance with appropriate antimicrobial prophylaxis.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 59
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Does a surgical site infection reduction bundle reduce racial disparities in infection after cesarean delivery?
    Kawakita, Tetsuya
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 220 (01) : S43 - S44
  • [22] Effectiveness of a care bundle to reduce surgical site infections in patients having open colorectal surgery
    Tanner, J.
    Kiernan, M.
    Hilliam, R.
    Davey, S.
    Collins, E.
    Wood, T.
    Ball, J.
    Leaper, D.
    ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2016, 98 (04) : 270 - 274
  • [23] Implementation of a Bundle of Care Interventions to reduce Surgical Site Infections
    Limbrick, J.
    Bajwa, A.
    Breckles, L.
    Dilworth, M.
    Bowley, D.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 103 : 112 - 112
  • [24] The Preventive Surgical Site Infection Bundle in Colorectal Surgery An Effective Approach to Surgical Site Infection Reduction and Health Care Cost Savings
    Keenan, Jeffrey E.
    Speicher, Paul J.
    Thacker, Julie K. M.
    Walter, Monica
    Kuchibhatla, Maragatha
    Mantyh, Christopher R.
    JAMA SURGERY, 2014, 149 (10) : 1045 - 1052
  • [25] Comment to: Do surgical drains reduce surgical site occurrence and infection after incisional hernia repair with sublay mesh?
    Li, Junsheng
    HERNIA, 2024, 29 (01)
  • [26] Perioperative Bundle to Reduce Surgical Site Infection after Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Prospective Cohort Study Discussion
    Adams, Reid B.
    Kooby, David A.
    Pitt, Henry A.
    Martin, Robert
    Shen, Perry
    Hines, Joe
    Allen, Peter
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2019, 228 (04) : 601 - 604
  • [27] Implementation of an Evidence-based bundle to reduce surgical site infection after caesarean section
    Seeto, K.
    Norton, M.
    Zhu, S.
    Mahomed, K.
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2022, 62 : 59 - 59
  • [28] Considerations regarding a prediction model of surgical site infection after gastrointestinal surgery
    Zhao, Shenglin
    Zhou, Hong
    He, Mei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 110 (07) : 4528 - 4529
  • [29] Surgical Site Infection After Gastrointestinal Surgery in China: A Multicenter Prospective Study
    Wang, Zhiwei
    Chen, Jun
    Wang, Peige
    Jie, Zhigang
    Jin, Weidong
    Wang, Gefei
    Li, Jieshou
    Ren, Jianan
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 240 : 206 - 218
  • [30] Implementation of a care bundle and evaluation of risk factors for surgical site infection in cranial neurosurgery
    Davies, Benjamin M.
    Jones, Anna
    Patel, Hiren C.
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2016, 144 : 121 - 125