Cost effectiveness of selective decontamination of the digestive tract in liver transplant patients

被引:10
|
作者
van Enckevort, PJ
Zwaveling, JH
Bottema, JT
Maring, JK
Klompmaker, IJ
Slooff, MJH
TenVergert, EM
机构
[1] Univ Groningen Hosp, Off Med Technol Assessment, NL-9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen Hosp, Liver Transplant Grp Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Groningen Hosp, Dept Internal Med, NL-9713 EZ Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.2165/00019053-200119050-00007
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess the cost effectiveness of selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) in liver transplant patients. Design: Randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial with an integrated economic evaluation. Setting: Two university hospitals in The Netherlands. Cost effectiveness was assessed from a societal perspective. Patients and participants: 58 patients who underwent liver transplantation and received SDD (n = 29) or placebo (n = 29) pre- and postoperatively. Interventions: SDD medication and placebo. Main outcome measures: Infection episodes, days of infection, costs of SDD and routine cultures, mean other direct medical costs per patient and additional costs of severe infection. Results: Costs of SDD medicine and routine cultures were on average 3100 US dollars ($US; 1997 values) per patient who underwent SDD. Both preoperatively and postoperatively, costs other than SDD and cultures did not significantly differ between the SDD and the placebo groups (preoperative, $US2370 vs $US2590; postoperative, $US25 455 vs $US24 915). Additional postoperative costs of severe infections were $US250 per day per patient. There were no significant differences in the mean number of infection episodes between groups. Conclusions: SDD leads to the additional costs of SDD medication and routine cultures, whereas no savings in other costs and no improvement in infection episodes are realised. Consequently, SDD may be considered as a nonefficient approach in patients undergoing liver transplantation. The additional costs of severe infection are considerable.
引用
收藏
页码:523 / 530
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Selective decontamination of the digestive tract: to stimulate or stifle?
    Bonten, MJM
    Brun-Buisson, C
    Weinstein, RA
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2003, 29 (05) : 672 - 676
  • [42] Selective decontamination of the digestive tract: to stimulate or stifle?
    Marc J. M. Bonten
    Christian Brun-Buisson
    Robert A. Weinstein
    Intensive Care Medicine, 2003, 29 : 672 - 676
  • [43] Selective decontamination of the digestive tract: Concept and application
    Alvarez, Eva Esther Tejerina
    Lopez, Miguel Angel de la Cal
    MEDICINA INTENSIVA, 2023, 47 (10) : 603 - 615
  • [44] What is new in selective decontamination of the digestive tract?
    Jozef Kesecioglu
    Philippe Eggimann
    Intensive Care Medicine, 2016, 42 : 1270 - 1275
  • [45] SELECTIVE DECONTAMINATION OF THE DIGESTIVE-TRACT - REPLY
    COCKERILL, FR
    MULLER, SR
    THOMPSON, RL
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1993, 118 (10) : 826 - 826
  • [46] COMMENT - SELECTIVE DECONTAMINATION OF THE DIGESTIVE-TRACT
    ROGERS, J
    VANSAENE, R
    SUTER, P
    ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 1992, 26 (12) : 1597 - 1598
  • [47] Selective decontamination of the digestive tract - The risks of prevention
    Ruef, C
    INFECTION, 2004, 32 (05) : 255 - 256
  • [48] Selective Decontamination of the Digestive Tract An Answer at Last?
    Bonten, Marc
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2022, 328 (23): : 2310 - 2311
  • [49] Selective decontamination of digestive tract in intensive care
    Verbrugh, HA
    LANCET, 2003, 362 (9401): : 2117 - 2118
  • [50] Is Selective Decontamination of the Digestive Tract Safe? Reply
    Roquilly, Antoine
    Marret, Emmanuel
    Abraham, Edward
    Asehnoune, Karim
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2015, 60 (11) : 1730 - U207