An Evaluation of Surgical Site Infections by Wound Classification System Using the ACS-NSQIP

被引:190
|
作者
Ortega, Gezzer [1 ]
Rhee, Daniel S. [1 ]
Papandria, Dominic J. [1 ]
Yang, Jessica [1 ]
Ibrahim, Andrew M. [1 ]
Shore, Andrew D. [1 ]
Makary, Martin A. [1 ]
Abdullah, Fizan [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ Hosp, Div Pediat Surg, Dept Surg, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
关键词
wound classification; surgical site infection; National Surgical Quality Improvement Program; surgical outcomes; PREVENTION; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jss.2011.05.056
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Surgical wound classification has been the foundation for infectious risk assessment, perioperative protocol development, and surgical decision-making. The wound classification system categorizes all surgeries into: clean, clean/contaminated, contaminated, and dirty, with estimated postoperative rates of surgical site infection (SSI) being 1%-5%, 3%-11%, 10%-17%, and over 27%, respectively. The present study evaluates the associated rates of the SSI by wound classification using a large risk adjusted surgical patient database. Methods. A cross-sectional study was performed using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) dataset between 2005 and 2008. All surgical cases that specified a wound class were included in our analysis. Patient demographics, hospital length of stay, preoperative risk factors, co-morbidities, and complication rates were compared across the different wound class categories. Surgical site infection rates for superficial, deep incisional, and organ/space infections were analyzed among the four wound classifications using multivariate logistic regression. Results. A total of 634,426 cases were analyzed. From this sample, 49.7% were classified as clean, 35.0% clean/contaminated, 8.56% contaminated, and 6.7% dirty. When stratifying by wound classification, the clean, clean/contaminated, contaminated, and dirty wound classifications had superficial SSI rates of 1.76%, 3.94%, 4.75%, and 5.16%, respectively. The rates of deep incisional infections were 0.54%, 0.86%, 1.31%, and 2.1%. The rates for organ/space infection were 0.28%, 1.87%, 2.55%, and 4.54%. Conclusion. Using ACS-NSQIP data, the present study demonstrates substantially lower rates of surgical site infections in the contaminated and dirty wound classifications than previously reported in the literature. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 38
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The ACS-NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator as a Predictor of Mortality in a Series of Surgical Covid-19 Patients
    Leydorf, Steven D.
    Dorey, Trevor F.
    Ali, Jibreel
    Klune, John R.
    Turcotte, Justin J.
    Zaidi, Sohail N.
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2023, 89 (06) : 2923 - 2924
  • [32] Racial Disparities in Surgical Outcomes Following Hiatal Hernia Repair: An ACS-NSQIP Analysis
    Park, Adrian E.
    Cook-Richardson, Sharma
    Addo, Alex J.
    Broda, Andrew
    Kim, Paul
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2021, 233 (05) : E7 - E8
  • [33] Evaluation of the ACS-NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator in Patients with Hepatic Metastases from Colorectal Cancer Undergoing Liver Resection
    Tommaso Campagnaro
    Edoardo Poletto
    Paola Tarchi
    Simone Rattizzato
    Giuseppe Verlato
    Simone Conci
    Corrado Pedrazzani
    Nicolò De Manzini
    Alfredo Guglielmi
    Andrea Ruzzenente
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2023, 27 : 2114 - 2125
  • [34] Does surgical approach affect outcomes of enucleation for benign and low-grade pancreatic tumors? An ACS-NSQIP evaluation
    Ore, Ana Sofia
    Klompmaker, Sjors
    Stackhouse, Kathryn
    Solis-Velasco, Monica
    Francken, Michiel
    Callery, Mark P.
    Kent, Tara S.
    Moser, A. James
    HPB, 2019, 21 (11) : 1585 - 1591
  • [35] Assessing Readmission After General, Vascular, and Thoracic Surgery Using ACS-NSQIP
    Lucas, Donald J.
    Haider, Adil
    Haut, Elliot
    Dodson, Rebecca
    Wolfgang, Christopher L.
    Ahuja, Nita
    Sweeney, John
    Pawlik, Timothy M.
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2013, 258 (03) : 430 - 439
  • [36] Evaluation of the ACS-NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator in Patients with Hepatic Metastases from Colorectal Cancer Undergoing Liver Resection
    Campagnaro, Tommaso
    Poletto, Edoardo
    Tarchi, Paola
    Rattizzato, Simone
    Verlato, Giuseppe
    Conci, Simone
    Pedrazzani, Corrado
    De Manzini, Nicolo
    Guglielmi, Alfredo
    Ruzzenente, Andrea
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2023, 27 (10) : 2114 - 2125
  • [37] Surgical risks, reconstruction, and facial nerve outcomes in parotidectomy: Insights from ACS-NSQIP data
    Brenner, Michael J.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2025, 101 : 275 - 276
  • [38] Analysis of Risk-Adjusted Surgical Outcomes in the ACS-NSQIP Demonstrates Improvements Over Time
    Thompson, K.
    Stuart, C. M.
    Bronsert, M. R.
    Henderson, W.
    Meguid, R.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2024, 72 (01) : 352 - 353
  • [39] Frailty and surgical outcomes in genitourinary prosthetic procedures: an ACS-NSQIP comparative analysis of risk indices
    Ghaffar, Umar
    Abbasi, Behzad
    Hakam, Nizar
    Fernandez, Adrian
    Carlisle, Marvin N.
    Pearce, Robert
    Patel, Hiren V.
    Li, Kevin D.
    Venishetty, Nikit
    Breyer, Benjamin N.
    INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2025,
  • [40] SHOULD CLASSIFICATION AS AN ACS-NSQIP HIGH OUTLIER BE USED TO DIRECT HOSPITAL QUALITY IMPROVEMENT EFFORTS?
    Lawson, E.
    Roberts, P.
    Marcello, P.
    Francone, T.
    Hall, J.
    Read, T.
    Schoetz, D.
    Ricciardi, R.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2016, 59 (05) : E329 - E329