From surface wave inversion to seismic site response prediction: Beyond the 1D approach

被引:15
|
作者
Boaga, Jacopo [1 ]
Renzi, Stefano [1 ]
Vignoli, Giulio [1 ,2 ]
Deiana, Rita [1 ]
Cassiani, Giorgio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Padua, Dipartimento Geosci, I-35122 Padua, Italy
[2] King Fahd Univ Petr & Minerals, Dept Earth Sci, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
关键词
PHASE-ANALYSIS; GROUND MOTION; VALIDATION; BASIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.soildyn.2012.01.001
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Surface wave methods consist of the extraction and inversion of the Rayleigh wave phase-velocity dispersion curve to recover the (usually 1D) shear-wave velocity profile. In the literature, uncertainty due to data error has not received much attention, but the discussion about uncertainty due to model error is even poorer. Even with an unrealistic noise-free dataset and an exact forward model, an inappropriate parameterization can generate solutions very far from the actual soil structure. In general, the model used for the dispersion curve interpretation is 1D. Hence, when the velocity distribution is laterally heterogeneous, model errors can have significant consequences on the reliability of the resulting shear-wave velocity distribution. From a poor velocity reconstruction, an unsatisfactory, and often dangerous site response analysis follows. In fact, shear wave measurements play a relevant role in seismic ground motion amplification estimation. In this paper, we discuss the possibility of processing the seismograms using a multi-offset phase analysis (MOPA), in order to derive soil elastic parameters for weak motion predictions. This technique allows the detection and location of the lateral discontinuities, and a better model parameterization. In fact, once the discontinuities are identified, we can split the profile into several, truly 1D, parts. The use of the standard 1D dispersion curve extraction and inversion for each side of the heterogeneity generates velocity profiles that we can put side by side to get correct 2D reconstructions of the shear-wave distributions. From 2D velocity reconstruction, we can calculate the site response that may be significantly different from the site response generated from a traditional 1D analysis of the same seismograms. In this work, we discuss the site responses of two synthetic examples with lateral heterogeneities. We show how misleading a 1D analysis may be if applied to a truly 2D velocity distribution, particularly in terms of site response prediction. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:38 / 51
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Tutorial: unified 1D inversion of the acoustic reflection response
    Slob, Evert
    Wapenaar, Kees
    Treitel, Sven
    GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING, 2020, 68 (05) : 1425 - 1442
  • [22] A Bayesian Inversion Approach for Site Characterization Using Surface Wave Measurements
    Akhlaghi, Mehdi M.
    Moaveni, Babak
    Baise, Laurie G.
    DYNAMICS OF CIVIL STRUCTURES, VOL 2, IMAC 2019, 2020, : 159 - 161
  • [23] Stochastic approach to study the site response in presence of shear wave velocity inversion: Application to seismic microzonation studies in Italy
    Fabozzi, S.
    Catalano, S.
    Falcone, G.
    Naso, G.
    Pagliaroli, A.
    Peronace, E.
    Porchia, A.
    Romagnoli, G.
    Moscatelli, M.
    ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 2021, 280
  • [24] Simplified Model for Small-Strain Nonlinearity and Strength in 1D Seismic Site Response Analysis
    Groholski, David R.
    Hashash, Youssef M. A.
    Kim, Byungmin
    Musgrove, Michael
    Harmon, Joseph
    Stewart, Jonathan P.
    JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 142 (09)
  • [25] Application of non-stationary shear-wave velocity randomization approach to predict 1D seismic site response and its variability at two downhole array recordings
    Youssef, E.
    Cornou, C.
    Youssef Abdel Massih, D.
    Al-Bittar, T.
    Yong, A.
    Hollender, F.
    Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2024, 186
  • [26] Stochastic 1D site response analysis at a site in central Italy
    Rota, M.
    Lai, C. G.
    Strobbia, C. L.
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2011, 31 (04) : 626 - 639
  • [27] 1D seismic analysis of earth dams: the example of the Lentini site
    Castelli, Francesco
    Lentini, Valentina
    Trifaro, Carla Assunta
    VI ITALIAN CONFERENCE OF RESEARCHERS IN GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING, CNRIG2016 - GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING IN MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH: FROM MICROSCALE TO REGIONAL SCALE, 2016, 158 : 356 - 361
  • [28] An Inversion of Lg-Wave Attenuation and Site Response from Seismic Spectral Ratios in the Eastern China Region
    Zhu, Xin-Yun
    BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2014, 104 (03) : 1389 - 1399
  • [29] Seismic Characterization of the Nevada National Security Site Using Joint Body Wave, Surface Wave, and Gravity Inversion
    Preston, Leiph
    Poppeliers, Christian
    Schodt, David J.
    BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2020, 110 (01) : 110 - 126
  • [30] Focusing the wavefield inside an unknown 1D medium: Beyond seismic interferometry
    Broggini, Filippo
    Snieder, Roel
    Wapenaar, Kees
    GEOPHYSICS, 2012, 77 (05) : A25 - A28