From surface wave inversion to seismic site response prediction: Beyond the 1D approach

被引:15
|
作者
Boaga, Jacopo [1 ]
Renzi, Stefano [1 ]
Vignoli, Giulio [1 ,2 ]
Deiana, Rita [1 ]
Cassiani, Giorgio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Padua, Dipartimento Geosci, I-35122 Padua, Italy
[2] King Fahd Univ Petr & Minerals, Dept Earth Sci, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
关键词
PHASE-ANALYSIS; GROUND MOTION; VALIDATION; BASIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.soildyn.2012.01.001
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Surface wave methods consist of the extraction and inversion of the Rayleigh wave phase-velocity dispersion curve to recover the (usually 1D) shear-wave velocity profile. In the literature, uncertainty due to data error has not received much attention, but the discussion about uncertainty due to model error is even poorer. Even with an unrealistic noise-free dataset and an exact forward model, an inappropriate parameterization can generate solutions very far from the actual soil structure. In general, the model used for the dispersion curve interpretation is 1D. Hence, when the velocity distribution is laterally heterogeneous, model errors can have significant consequences on the reliability of the resulting shear-wave velocity distribution. From a poor velocity reconstruction, an unsatisfactory, and often dangerous site response analysis follows. In fact, shear wave measurements play a relevant role in seismic ground motion amplification estimation. In this paper, we discuss the possibility of processing the seismograms using a multi-offset phase analysis (MOPA), in order to derive soil elastic parameters for weak motion predictions. This technique allows the detection and location of the lateral discontinuities, and a better model parameterization. In fact, once the discontinuities are identified, we can split the profile into several, truly 1D, parts. The use of the standard 1D dispersion curve extraction and inversion for each side of the heterogeneity generates velocity profiles that we can put side by side to get correct 2D reconstructions of the shear-wave distributions. From 2D velocity reconstruction, we can calculate the site response that may be significantly different from the site response generated from a traditional 1D analysis of the same seismograms. In this work, we discuss the site responses of two synthetic examples with lateral heterogeneities. We show how misleading a 1D analysis may be if applied to a truly 2D velocity distribution, particularly in terms of site response prediction. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:38 / 51
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effect of surface wave inversion non-uniqueness on 1D seismic ground response analysis
    Roy, Narayan
    SankarJakka, Ravi
    Wason, H. R.
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2013, 68 (02) : 1141 - 1153
  • [2] Reply to comment on “Effect of surface wave inversion non-uniqueness on 1D seismic ground response analysis”
    Narayan Roy
    Ravi Sankar Jakka
    H. R. Wason
    Natural Hazards, 2015, 75 : 983 - 989
  • [3] Reply to comment on "Effect of surface wave inversion non-uniqueness on 1D seismic ground response analysis''
    Roy, Narayan
    Jakka, Ravi Sankar
    Wason, H. R.
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2015, 75 (01) : 983 - 989
  • [4] Shear wave profiles from surface wave inversion: the impact of uncertainty on seismic site response analysis
    Boaga, J.
    Vignoli, G.
    Cassiani, G.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS AND ENGINEERING, 2011, 8 (02) : 162 - 174
  • [5] Comment on 'Shear wave profiles from surface wave inversion: the impact of uncertainty on seismic site response analysis'
    Socco, Laura Valentina
    Foti, Sebastiano
    Comina, Cesare
    Boiero, Daniele
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS AND ENGINEERING, 2012, 9 (02) : 241 - 243
  • [6] Reply to comment on 'Shear wave profile from surface wave inversion: the impact of uncertainty on seismic site response analysis'
    Boaga, Jacopo
    Vignoli, Giulio
    Cassiani, Giorgio
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS AND ENGINEERING, 2012, 9 (02) : 244 - 246
  • [7] Comment on "Effect of surface wave inversion non-uniqueness on 1D seismic ground response analysis'' by Roy et al.
    Pettiti, Alberto
    Foti, Sebastiano
    Comina, Cesare
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2015, 75 (01) : 975 - 981
  • [8] Comment on “Effect of surface wave inversion non-uniqueness on 1D seismic ground response analysis” by Roy et al.
    Alberto Pettiti
    Sebastiano Foti
    Cesare Comina
    Natural Hazards, 2015, 75 : 975 - 981
  • [9] Non-uniqueness in surface-wave inversion and consequences on seismic site response analyses
    Foti, S.
    Comina, C.
    Boiero, D.
    Socco, L. V.
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2009, 29 (06) : 982 - 993
  • [10] Seismic Site Classification from Surface Wave Data to Vs,30 without Inversion
    Lin, Shibin
    Gucunski, Nenad
    Shams, Sadegh
    Wang, Yujin
    JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 147 (06)