Optimal systolic and diastolic reconstruction windows for coronary CT angiography using 320-detector, rows dynamic volume CT

AIM: To investigate the optimal pattern of systolic and diastolic reconstruction windows for coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography using 320-detector rows dynamic volume CT (DVCT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective analysis was performed on the data from 77 patients who were admitted between December 2008 and July 2009 for DVCT. The images were reconstructed in 10% steps throughout the 10-100% of R-R interval. Data sets for the three major coronary arteries [right coronary artery (RCA), left anterior descending artery (LAD), and left circumflex artery (LCX)] were evaluated by two independent readers. The quality of the images from each examined artery was graded from 1 (no motion artefacts) to 4 (severe motion artefacts over the entire vessel). The optimal systolic and diastolic reconstruction windows and the relationship between image quality and heart rate (HR) were analysed. The HR at which the optimal reconstruction window shifted from diastole to systole was predicted. RESULTS: The average HR during imaging was 69.5 +/- 12.8 beats/min (range 46-102 beats/min). HR was positively correlated with the proportion of systole (r = 0.78, p < 0.001). As HR increased, the optimal reconstruction windows shifted to later phases in both systole and diastole. Image quality for optimal systolic and diastolic reconstructions both deteriorated significantly with higher HRs (r = 0.38, p < 0.001; r = 0.82, p < 0.001). However, image quality in systolic reconstructions did not deteriorate as much as in diastolic reconstructions. The cutoff HRs at which optimal reconstruction intervals turned from diastole to systole was 90.8 beats/min. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with a low HR, the optimal coronary reconstruction window is in mid-late diastole. As the HR increases, systolic reconstruction often yields superior image quality compared with diastolic reconstruction. (C) 2011 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.