'If 2=3, then 2+1=3+1': Reply to Heylen and Horsten

被引：1
|
作者：
Lowe, E. J. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Durham, Durham DH1 3HP, England
来源：
PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY | 2008年 / 58卷 / 232期
关键词：
D O I：
10.1111/j.1467-9213.2007.552.x
中图分类号：
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号：
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要：
Jan Heylen and Leon Horsten object to my proposed analysis of ordinary-language conditionals by appealing to certain putative counter-examples. In this reply, I explain how, by ignoring my reading of the indicative/subjunctive distinction, their objection misses its target. I also criticize their underlying methodology.
引用
收藏
页码：528 / 531
页数：4
相关论文
共 50 条
12345