Long-term Outcomes after Salvage Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) following In-Field Failure of Initial SRS for Brain Metastases

被引:37
|
作者
Rana, Nitesh [1 ]
Pendyala, Praveen [1 ]
Cleary, Ryan K. [1 ]
Luo, Guozhen [1 ]
Zhao, Zhiguo [2 ]
Chambless, Lola B. [3 ]
Cmelak, Anthony J. [1 ]
Attia, Albert [1 ]
Stavas, Mark J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Nashville, TN 37235 USA
[2] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Biostat, Nashville, TN USA
[3] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Neurol Surg, Nashville, TN USA
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2017年 / 7卷
关键词
brain metastases; stereotactic radiosurgery; radionecrosis; reirradiation; repeat SRS; CELL LUNG-CANCER; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; RADIOTHERAPY; MANAGEMENT; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2017.00279
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: The optimal treatment strategy following local recurrence after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) remains unclear. While upfront SRS has been extensively studied, few reports focus on outcomes after retreatment. Here, we report the results following a second course of SRS for local recurrence of brain metastases previously treated with SRS. Methods: Using institutional database, patients who received salvage SRS (SRS2) following in-field failure of initial SRS (SRS1) for brain metastases were identified. Radionecrosis and local failure were defined radiographically by MRI following SRS2. The primary endpoint was defined as the time from SRS2 to the date of all-cause death or last follow-up [ overall survival (OS)]. The secondary endpoints included local failure-free survival (LFFS) and radionecrosis-free survival, defined as the time from SRS2 to the date of local failure or radionecrosis, or last follow-up, respectively. Results: Twenty-eight patients with 32 brain metastases were evaluated between years 2004 and 2015. The median interval between SRS1 and SRS2 was 9.7 months. Median OS was 22.0 months. Median LFFS time after SRS2 was 13.6 months. The overall local control rate following SRS2 was 84.4%. The 1- and 2-year local control rates are 88.3% (95% CI, 76.7-100%) and 80.3% (95% CI, 63.5-100%), respectively. The overall rate of radionecrosis following SRS2 was 18.8%. On univariate analysis, higher prescribed isodose line (p = 0.033) and higher gross tumor volume (p = 0.015) at SRS1 were associated with radionecrosis. Although not statistically significant, there was a trend toward lower risk of radionecrosis with interval surgical resection, fractionated SRS, lower total EQD2 (<50 Gy), and lack of concurrent systemic therapy at SRS2. Conclusion: In select patients, repeat LINAC-based SRS following recurrence remains a reasonable option leading to long-term survival and local control. Radionecrosis approaches 20% for high risk individuals and parallels historic values.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY (SRS) FOR BRAIN METASTASES FROM MELANOMA: AN EVALUATION OF OUTCOMES AT A UK TERTIARY CENTRE
    Haris, Puteri Abdul
    Al-Salihi, Omar
    Blythe, Kirsty
    Chia, Kazumi
    Hassan, Sheila
    Sisodia, Caroline
    Brazil, Lucy
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2022, 24 : 197 - 197
  • [32] Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for the treatment of brain metastases: Outcomes for lung cancer patients in South Wales
    Walters, Sarah
    Poon-King, Ashley
    Case, Amy
    Maclean, Jillian
    Powell, James
    Iqbal, Najmus Sahar
    LUNG CANCER, 2024, 190
  • [33] Outcomes of a Single Isocenter Brain Multi -Metastases Linear Accelerator Delivered Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS)
    Mapp, J. E.
    McDougall, R. P.
    Robbins, J. R.
    Hsu, C. C.
    Stea, B.
    Morrison, C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2023, 117 (02): : E135 - E135
  • [34] STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY (SRS) FOR BRAIN METASTASES IN BREAST CANCER: AN EVALUATION OF OUTCOMES AT A UK TERTIARY CENTRE
    Abdul Haris, P.
    Brazil, L.
    Blythe, K.
    Chia, K.
    Hassan, S.
    Loganathan, T.
    Smith, D.
    Swampillai, A.
    Al-Salihi, O.
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2022, 24
  • [35] Salvage whole brain radiotherapy or stereotactic radiosurgery after initial stereotactic radiosurgery for 1–4 brain metastases
    Yufei Liu
    Brian M. Alexander
    Yu-Hui Chen
    Margaret C. Horvath
    Ayal A. Aizer
    Elizabeth B. Claus
    Ian F. Dunn
    Alexandra J. Golby
    Mark D. Johnson
    Scott Friesen
    Edward G. Mannarino
    Matthew Wagar
    Fred L. Hacker
    Nils D. Arvold
    Journal of Neuro-Oncology, 2015, 124 : 429 - 437
  • [36] Long-term Survivors of Brain Metastases (BM) Have Optimal Brain Tumor Control with Combined Whole Brain Radiation (WBRT) and Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS)
    Yovino, S. G.
    Rutter, C.
    Szerlip, N.
    Kwok, Y.
    Maggio, W.
    Regine, W. F.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2009, 75 (03): : S245 - S245
  • [37] Safety and efficacy of silibinin in patients with brain metastases after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS): The SUSTAIN trial
    Bertini, N.
    Visani, L.
    Bonaparte, I.
    Carnevale, M. G.
    Bettazzi, B.
    Romei, A.
    Becherini, C.
    Greto, D.
    Detti, B.
    Meattini, I.
    Livi, L.
    Desideri, I.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2023, 34 : S404 - S405
  • [38] Outcome with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and ipilimumab (Ipi) for malignant melanoma brain metastases
    Shoukat, Sana
    Marcus, David Mitchell
    Rizzo, Monica
    Lawson, David H.
    Liu, Yuan
    Khan, Mohammad Khurram
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 31 (15)
  • [39] Radionecrosis (RN) in patients with brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and immunotherapy
    Andring, Lauren
    Squires, Bryan
    Seymour, Zachary
    Fahim, Daniel
    Jacob, Jeffrey
    Ye, Hong
    Marvin, Kimberly
    Grills, Inga
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2023, 133 (02) : 186 - 193
  • [40] Using Prognostic Indices for Brain Metastases in the Setting of Delayed Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS)
    Malouff, T.
    Bennion, N. R.
    Verma, V.
    Martinez, G. A.
    Balkman, N.
    Bhirud, A. R.
    Lin, C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2015, 93 (03): : E90 - E90