Prognostic significance of perioperative blood transfusions in resectable thoracic esophageal cancer

被引:4
|
作者
Tachibana, M [1 ]
Tabara, H [1 ]
Kotoh, T [1 ]
Kinugasa, S [1 ]
Dhar, DK [1 ]
Hishikawa, Y [1 ]
Masunaga, R [1 ]
Kubota, H [1 ]
Nagasue, N [1 ]
机构
[1] Shimane Med Univ, Dept Surg 2, Izumo, Shimane 6938501, Japan
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY | 1999年 / 94卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE: The perioperative blood transfusions have been associated with tumor recurrence and decreased survival in various types of alimentary tract cancer. There exist, however, contradictory studies showing no relationship between blood transfusions and survival. For patients with esophageal cancer, only one report suggested that blood transfusions did not by itself decrease the chance of cure after esophagectomy. METHODS: Among 235 patients with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus between December 1979 and March 1998, 143 patients (60.9%) underwent esophagectomy with curative intent (RO). To exclude the effects of surgery-related postoperative complications, 14 patients who died within 90 days during the hospital stay were excluded. Thus, clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors were retrospectively investigated between patients with no or few transfusions (less than or equal to 2 units) (n = 58), and much transfused patients (greater than or equal to 3 units) (n = 71). RESULTS: Sixty-three patients are alive and free of cancer, and 66 patients are dead. A total of 98 patients (76%) received blood transfusions, whereas 31 patients (24%) had no transfusion. The amount of blood transfused was 1 or 2 units in 27 patients (27.6%), 3 or 4 units in 33 (33.7%), 5 or 6 units in 20 (20.4%), and greater than or equal to 7 units in 18 (18.4%). The 5-yr survival rate for patients with no or few transfusions was 69%, whereas that for much transfused patients was 31.7% (p < 0.0001). The much transfused patients had more prominent ulcerative tumor, longer time of operation, more estimated blood loss, and more marked blood vessel invasion than the group with no or few transfusions. The factors influencing survival rate were tumor location, Borrmann classification, size of tumor, depth of invasion, number of lymph node metastases, time of operation, amount of blood transfusions, lymph vessel invasion, and blood vessel invasion. Among those nine significant variables verified by univariate analysis, independent prognostic factors for survival determined by multivariate analysis were number of lymph node metastasis (0 or 1 vs greater than or equal to 2, p < 0.0001), amount of blood transfusions (less than or equal to 2 units vs greater than or equal to 3 units, p < 0.0001), and blood vessel invasion (marked vs non-marked, p 0.0207). CONCLUSIONS: There is an association between high amount of blood transfusions and decreased survival for patients with resectable esophageal cancer. To improve the prognosis, surgeons must be careful to reduce blood loss during esophagectomy with extensive lymph node dissection and subsequently must minimize blood transfusions. (Am J Gastroenterol 1999;94:757-765. (C) 1999 by Am. Coll. of Gastroenterology).
引用
收藏
页码:757 / 765
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Prognostic significance of blood transfusion in patients with esophageal cancer after chemo-radiotherapy
    Lim, J.
    Truong, P.
    Joe, H.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2006, 17 : 88 - 88
  • [42] Prognostic significance of gamma-glutamyltransferase in patients with resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
    Yang, F.
    Zhang, S.
    Yang, H.
    Luo, K.
    Wen, J.
    Hu, Y.
    Hu, R.
    Huang, Q.
    Chen, J.
    Fu, J.
    DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2015, 28 (05) : 496 - 504
  • [43] Discovery of prognostic and predictive tissue biomarkers in patients with resectable esophageal cancer
    MacGregor, Thomas P.
    Gillies, Richard S.
    Sahgal, Natasha
    Chetty, Runjan
    Wang, Lai-Mun
    Turkington, Richard Calvin
    Maynard, Nicholas D.
    Mchugh, Peter J.
    Kennedy, Richard D.
    Middleton, Mark R.
    Sharma, Ricky A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 32 (03)
  • [44] Perioperative blood transfusions - Indications and options
    McFarland, JG
    CHEST, 1999, 115 (05) : 113S - 121S
  • [45] Minimising perioperative homologous blood transfusions
    Aning, J. J.
    McGrath, J. S.
    ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2011, 93 (04) : 336 - 336
  • [46] PERIOPERATIVE BLOOD-TRANSFUSIONS AND PROSTATE-CANCER RECURRENCE AND SURVIVAL
    HEAL, JM
    CHUANG, C
    BLUMBERG, N
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1988, 156 (05): : 374 - 379
  • [48] Inflammatory response, immunosuppression, and cancer recurrence after perioperative blood transfusions
    Cata, J. P.
    Wang, H.
    Gottumukkala, V.
    Reuben, J.
    Sessler, D. I.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2013, 110 (05) : 690 - 701
  • [49] INFLUENCE OF PERIOPERATIVE BLOOD-TRANSFUSIONS ON PROGNOSIS OF BREAST-CANCER
    DELACHEVALLERIE, V
    HOCKEL, M
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 1991, 250 (1-4) : 221 - 222
  • [50] Prognostic impact of perioperative blood transfusions on oncological outcomes of patients with bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy: A systematic review
    Volz, Yannic
    Eismann, Lennert
    Pfitzinger, Paulo L.
    Jokisch, Jan-Friedrich
    Buchner, Alexander
    Schlenker, Boris
    Stief, Christian G.
    Schulz, Gerald B.
    ARAB JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 19 (01) : 24 - 30