Early mover (dis)advantages and knowledge spillover effects on blockchain startups' funding and innovation performance

被引:50
|
作者
Park, Gunno [1 ]
Shin, Seungryul Ryan [2 ]
Choy, Minkyung [3 ]
机构
[1] Technol Innovat Grp, SK Telecom, 65 Eulji Ro, Seoul 04539, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Technol Management Econ & Policy Program TEMEP, 1 Gwanak Ro, Seoul 08826, South Korea
[3] Kangwon Natl Univ, Coll Business Adm, 1 Gangwondaehakgil, Chuncheon Si 24341, Gangwon Do, South Korea
关键词
Blockchain startups; Early mover advantages; Knowledge spillover; Venture capital investment; Innovation performance; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES; FIRM PERFORMANCE; HIGH-TECHNOLOGY; ENTRY; STRATEGY; 1ST-MOVER; INVESTMENT; INDUSTRY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.068
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study investigates whether early mover (dis)advantages are valid in the blockchain industry. Specifically, it examines how the entry timing of a startup in the blockchain industry affects its funding attraction from venture capitals and innovation performance. Moreover, this study examines whether the startup's knowledge spillover activities moderate the relationship between its entry timing and subsequent performance. An empirical analysis is conducted on 255 startups in the blockchain industry founded between 2007 and 2016. The results show that while early mover advantages exist in terms of funding attraction from venture capitals, the entry timing and innovation performance have an inverted U-shaped relationship, as expected. Knowledge spillover activities of blockchain startups positively moderate the relationship between the entry timing and the venture capital attraction. Managerial and theoretical implications for the blockchain industry are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:64 / 75
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The convergence mechanism and spatial spillover effects of urban industry-university-research collaborative innovation performance in China
    Fan, Fei
    Yang, Bo
    Wang, Song
    TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2023,
  • [32] The effects of external knowledge source heterogeneity on enterprise process and product innovation performance
    Si, Yuefang
    Liu, Wanxin
    Cao, Xianzhong
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (06):
  • [33] INVESTIGATING FIRM-LEVEL EFFECTS OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES ON INNOVATION PERFORMANCE
    Mangiarotti, Giovanni
    Mention, Anne-Laure
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2015, 19 (01)
  • [34] Organizational innovation promoters and performance effects in small, knowledge-intensive firms
    Jenssen, Jan Inge
    Aasheim, Kari
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND INNOVATION, 2010, 11 (01): : 19 - 27
  • [35] Effects of Social Capital and Knowledge Integration on Innovation Performance: An Example of Virtual Teams
    Li, Jieyi
    Wan, Xiaoxiao
    Wang, Xia
    REVISTA DE CERCETARE SI INTERVENTIE SOCIALA, 2020, 69 : 227 - 240
  • [36] The effects of organizational isomorphism on innovation performance through knowledge search in industrial cluster
    Zhang, Hui
    Hu, Baoliang
    CHINESE MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2017, 11 (02) : 209 - 229
  • [37] How to create organizational change capability? Management dynamic capability, innovation, and it's impact on the organizational performance: Knowledge spillover as mediating variable
    Rahman, Zainur
    Wijayati, Dewie Tri
    Witjaksono, Andre Dwijanto
    Rozaq, Khoirur
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND INNOVATION, 2023,
  • [38] Innovative talent agglomeration, spatial spillover effects and regional innovation performance-Analyzing the threshold effect of government support
    Li, Yan
    Sun, Fan
    Li, Mengyu
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (10):
  • [39] The effects of innovation-cost strategy, knowledge, and action in the supply chain on firm performance
    Craighead, Christopher W.
    Hult, G. Tomas M.
    Ketchen, David J., Jr.
    JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2009, 27 (05) : 405 - 421
  • [40] Disentangling antecedents and performance effects of family SME innovation: A knowledge-based perspective
    Andreas Kallmuenzer
    Ursula Scholl-Grissemann
    International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 2017, 13 : 1117 - 1138