Heart failure disease management in an indigent population

Background Multidisciplinary disease management programs (MDMP) have demonstrated reduced hospitalizations in motivated pretransplant heart failure populations, but little is known about their effectiveness in largely indigent patients who are not transplant candidates. Methods and Results We studied 35 patients with heart failure with left ventricular election fraction (EF) less than or equal to 45% enrolled in an MDMP who were either indigent or funded by Medicaid/Medicare. This nonrandomized sample consisted of 14 patients identified because they had hospital readmission rates of greater than or equal to2 per year (group A) and 21 patients referred by their primary care physicians because they were difficult to manege (group B). Group A patients were New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV, aged 25 to 87 years (mean 57 +/- 17 SD) and had an EF of 15% to 45% (29% +/- 11%). Group B patients were NYHA class II or III, aged 35 to 86 (57 +/- 16) years and had an EF of 20% to 45% (28% +/- 10%): Data were compared for the year before enrollment in the MDMP and the year afterward. In group A hospital admissions decreased from 33 to 3, a 91% reduction, and NYHA class improved to class II-III (P < .001). In group B hospital admissions decreased from 9 to 0, and NYHA class improved to class I-II (P < .001). When hospital and clinic charges were assessed for both groups, the net savings were $162,000 per year or $4600 per patient. Conclusions A multidisciplinary heart failure program can improve functional status and reduce hospitalization and net costs compared with conventional care in indigent non-transplant candidate patients.