Image quality of up-converted 2D video from frame-compatible 3D video

被引:0
|
作者
Speranza, Filippo [1 ]
Tam, Wa James [1 ]
Vazquez, Carlos [1 ]
Renaud, Ron [1 ]
Blanchfield, Phil [1 ]
机构
[1] Commun Res Ctr Canada, Ottawa, ON K2H 8S2, Canada
关键词
3DTV; frame-compatible; picture quality; DSIS;
D O I
10.1117/12.877391
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
In the stereoscopic frame-compatible format, the separate high-definition left and high-definition right views are reduced in resolution and packed to fit within the same video frame as a conventional two-dimensional high-definition signal. This format has been suggested for 3DTV since it does not require additional transmission bandwidth and entails only small changes to the existing broadcasting infrastructure. In some instances, the frame-compatible format might be used to deliver both 2D and 3D services, e.g., for over-the-air television services. In those cases, the video quality of the 2D service is bound to decrease since the 2D signal will have to be generated by up-converting one of the two views. In this study, we investigated such loss by measuring the perceptual image quality of 1080i and 720p up-converted video as compared to that of full resolution original 2D video. The video was encoded with either a MPEG-2 or a H. 264/AVC codec at different bit rates and presented for viewing with either no polarized glasses (2D viewing mode) or with polarized glasses (3D viewing mode). The results confirmed a loss of video quality of the 2D video up-converted material. The loss due to the sampling processes inherent to the frame-compatible format was rather small for both 1080i and 720p video formats; the loss became more substantial with encoding, particularly for MPEG-2 encoding. The 3D viewing mode provided higher quality ratings, possibly because the visibility of the degradations was reduced.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Selecting scenes for 2D and 3D subjective video quality tests
    Pinson, Margaret H.
    Barkowsky, Marcus
    Le Callet, Patrick
    EURASIP JOURNAL ON IMAGE AND VIDEO PROCESSING, 2013,
  • [22] Selecting scenes for 2D and 3D subjective video quality tests
    Margaret H Pinson
    Marcus Barkowsky
    Patrick Le Callet
    EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing, 2013
  • [23] 3D VIDEO QUALITY METRIC FOR 3D VIDEO COMPRESSION
    Banitalebi-Dehkordi, Amin
    Pourazad, Mahsa T.
    Nasiopoulos, Panos
    2013 IEEE 11TH IVMSP WORKSHOP: 3D IMAGE/VIDEO TECHNOLOGIES AND APPLICATIONS (IVMSP 2013), 2013,
  • [24] A TECHNIQUE FOR FAKE 3D (2D-TO-3D CONVERTED) VIDEO RECOGNITION
    Kakaletsis, Efstratios
    Nikolaidis, Nikos
    2015 23RD EUROPEAN SIGNAL PROCESSING CONFERENCE (EUSIPCO), 2015, : 106 - 109
  • [25] The Effect of Frame Rate on 3D Video Quality and Bitrate
    Banitalebi-Dehkordi, Amin
    Pourazad, Mahsa T.
    Nasiopoulos, Panos
    3D RESEARCH, 2015, 6 (01): : 1 - 13
  • [26] TILE FORMAT: A NOVEL FRAME COMPATIBLE APPROACH FOR 3D VIDEO BROADCASTING
    Ballocca, Giovanni
    D'Amato, Paolo
    Grangetto, Marco
    Lucenteforte, Maurizio
    2011 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MULTIMEDIA AND EXPO (ICME), 2011,
  • [27] A 2D to 3D video and image conversion technique based on a bilateral filter
    Angot, Ludovic J.
    Huang, Wei-Jia
    Liu, Kai-Che
    THREE-DIMENSIONAL IMAGE PROCESSING (3DIP) AND APPLICATIONS, 2010, 7526
  • [28] Stereoscopic 3D video coding quality evaluation with 2D objective metrics
    Wang, K.
    Brunnstrom, K.
    Barkowsky, M.
    Urvoy, M.
    Sjostrom, M.
    Le Callet, P.
    Tourancheau, S.
    Andren, B.
    STEREOSCOPIC DISPLAYS AND APPLICATIONS XXIV, 2013, 8648
  • [29] Providing 3D Video Services: The Challenge From 2D to 3DTV Quality of Experience
    Maria Cubero, Jose
    Gutierrez, Jesus
    Perez, Pablo
    Estalayo, Enrique
    Cabrera, Julian
    Jaureguizar, Fernando
    Garcia, Narciso
    BELL LABS TECHNICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 16 (04) : 115 - 134
  • [30] CONTRAST EFFECT ON 3D AND 2D VIDEO PERCEPTION
    Mai, Zicong
    Pourazad, Mahsa T.
    Nasiopoulos, Panos
    2011 THIRD INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON QUALITY OF MULTIMEDIA EXPERIENCE (QOMEX), 2011, : 173 - 176