Monte-Carlo Tree Search in Dragline Operation Planning

被引:1
|
作者
Liu, Haoquan [1 ]
Austin, Kevin [1 ]
Forbes, Michael [2 ]
Kearney, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Mech & Min Engn, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Sch Math & Phys, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
来源
关键词
Optimization and optimal control; mining robotics; Monte-Carlo tree search (MCTS); excavation planning; AUTOMATION;
D O I
10.1109/LRA.2017.2757964
中图分类号
TP24 [机器人技术];
学科分类号
080202 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Draglines are one of the largest earthmoving machines in surface mining. They are employed to remove the overburden near the surface, giving access to a seam of the target mineral or coal underneath. Their excavation productivity is significantly affected by the high-level operation strategy of where to position the dragline, what to dig at each position and where to dump the removed material. This letter explores the potential of using the Monte-Carlo tree search (MCTS) algorithm for planning this operation strategy. To this end, we adapt the MCTS algorithm to compute the dragline positioning sequences when a fixed digging and dumping strategy is applied at each position. The performance of the adapted MCTS algorithm is compared to a previously developed A* search algorithm and a greedy algorithm. Simulation results show that the MCTS algorithm is able to find near-optimal positioning sequences using significantly less time and memory than the A* algorithm. The solutions from the MCTS algorithm also largely outperform the solutions from the greedy algorithm in all the test scenarios. These results suggest that the MCTS algorithm can be used to plan the operation strategy when decisions about the digging and dumping operations are also considered.
引用
收藏
页码:419 / 425
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Automated Machine Learning with Monte-Carlo Tree Search
    Rakotoarison, Herilalaina
    Schoenauer, Marc
    Sebag, Michele
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-EIGHTH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2019, : 3296 - 3303
  • [32] Can Monte-Carlo Tree Search learn to sacrifice?
    Nathan Companez
    Aldeida Aleti
    Journal of Heuristics, 2016, 22 : 783 - 813
  • [33] CROSS-ENTROPY FOR MONTE-CARLO TREE SEARCH
    Chaslot, Guillaume M. J. B.
    Winands, Mark H. M.
    Szita, Istvan
    van den Herik, H. Jaap
    ICGA JOURNAL, 2008, 31 (03) : 145 - 156
  • [34] Monte-Carlo Tree Search Parallelisation for Computer Go
    van Niekerk, Francois
    Kroon, Steve
    van Rooyen, Gert-Jan
    Inggs, Cornelia P.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN INSTITUTE FOR COMPUTER SCIENTISTS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGISTS CONFERENCE, 2012, : 129 - 138
  • [35] Parallel Monte-Carlo Tree Search for HPC Systems
    Graf, Tobias
    Lorenz, Ulf
    Platzner, Marco
    Schaefers, Lars
    EURO-PAR 2011 PARALLEL PROCESSING, PT 2, 2011, 6853 : 365 - 376
  • [36] Monte-Carlo Tree Search for the Maximum Satisfiability Problem
    Goffinet, Jack
    Ramanujan, Raghuram
    PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE OF CONSTRAINT PROGRAMMING, CP 2016, 2016, 9892 : 251 - 267
  • [37] Monte-Carlo Tree Search for the Game of Scotland Yard
    Nijssen, J. A. M.
    Winands, Mark H. M.
    2011 IEEE CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND GAMES (CIG), 2011, : 158 - 165
  • [38] Can Monte-Carlo Tree Search learn to sacrifice?
    Companez, Nathan
    Aleti, Aldeida
    JOURNAL OF HEURISTICS, 2016, 22 (06) : 783 - 813
  • [39] Bayesian Optimization for Backpropagation in Monte-Carlo Tree Search
    Lim, Nengli
    Li, Yueqin
    ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS AND MACHINE LEARNING - ICANN 2021, PT II, 2021, 12892 : 209 - 221
  • [40] Monte-Carlo Tree Search by Best Arm Identification
    Kaufmann, Emilie
    Koolen, Wouter M.
    ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 30 (NIPS 2017), 2017, 30