Mapping Arctic clam abundance using multiple datasets, models, and a spatially explicit accuracy assessment

被引:3
|
作者
Misiuk, Benjamin [1 ]
Bell, Trevor [1 ]
Aitken, Alec [2 ]
Brown, Craig J. [3 ]
Edinger, Evan N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Univ Newfoundland, Dept Geog, 232 Elizabeth Ave, St John, NF A1B 3X9, Canada
[2] Univ Saskatchewan, Dept Geog & Planning, Kirk Hall Bldg 117 Sci Pl, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5C8, Canada
[3] Nova Scotia Community Coll Ivany Campus, Appl Res, 80 Mawiomi Pl, Dartmouth, NS B2Y 0A5, Canada
关键词
Arctic science; benthic habitat mapping; fisheries management; spatial autocorrelation; species distribution modelling; SPECIES DISTRIBUTION MODELS; CROSS-VALIDATION; RANDOM FOREST; AUTOCORRELATION; SELECTION; SEA; STRATEGIES; PREDICTION; FEATURES; ISLAND;
D O I
10.1093/icesjms/fsz099
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
Species distribution models are commonly used in the marine environment as management tools. The high cost of collecting marine data for modelling makes them finite, especially in remote locations. Underwater image datasets from multiple surveys were leveraged to model the presence-absence and abundance of Arctic soft-shell clam (Mya spp.) to support the management of a local small-scale fishery in Qikiqtarjuaq, Nunavut, Canada. These models were combined to predict Mya abundance, conditional on presence throughout the study area. Results suggested that water depth was the primary environmental factor limiting Mya habitat suitability, yet seabed topography and substrate characteristics influence their abundance within suitable habitat. Ten-fold cross-validation and spatial leave-one-out cross-validation (LOO CV) were used to assess the accuracy of combined predictions and to test whether this was inflated by the spatial autocorrelation of transect sample data. Results demonstrated that four different measures of predictive accuracy were substantially inflated due to spatial autocorrelation, and the spatial LOO CV results were therefore adopted as the best estimates of performance.
引用
收藏
页码:2349 / 2361
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Tropical deforestation in Madagascar: analysis using hierarchical spatially explicit, Bayesian regression models
    Agarwal, DK
    Silander, JA
    Gelfand, AE
    Dewar, RE
    Mickelson, JG
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2005, 185 (01) : 105 - 131
  • [42] Scaling-up spatially-explicit ecological models using graphics processors
    van de Koppel, Johan
    Gupta, Rohit
    Vuik, Cornelis
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2011, 222 (17) : 3011 - 3019
  • [43] Predicting Classification Accuracy of Unlabeled Datasets Using Multiple Deep Neural Networks
    You, Shingchern D.
    Liu, Hsiao-Chung
    Liu, Chien-Hung
    IEEE ACCESS, 2022, 10 : 44627 - 44637
  • [44] A scale-sensitive framework for the spatially explicit accuracy assessment of binary built-up surface layers
    Uhl, Johannes H.
    Leyk, Stefan
    REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 279
  • [45] Mapping Sage-Grouse Fence-Collision Risk: Spatially Explicit Models for Targeting Conservation Implementation
    Stevens, Bryan S.
    Naugle, David E.
    Dennis, Brian
    Connelly, John W.
    Griffiths, Tim
    Reese, Kerry P.
    WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN, 2013, 37 (02): : 409 - 415
  • [46] Estimating Key Largo Woodrat Abundance Using Spatially Explicit Capture-Recapture and Trapping Point Transects
    Potts, Joanne M.
    Buckland, Stephen T.
    Thomas, Len
    Savage, Anne
    WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN, 2016, 40 (02): : 331 - 338
  • [47] Some challenges in global land cover mapping: An assessment of agreement and accuracy in existing 1 km datasets
    Herold, M.
    Mayaux, P.
    Woodcock, C. E.
    Baccini, A.
    Schmullius, C.
    REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2008, 112 (05) : 2538 - 2556
  • [48] How good is my map? A tool for semi-automated thematic mapping and spatially explicit confidence assessment
    Mitchell, Peter J.
    Downie, Anna-Leena
    Diesing, Markus
    ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2018, 108 : 111 - 122
  • [49] Automatic High-Accuracy Sea Ice Mapping in the Arctic Using MODIS Data
    Jiang, Liyuan
    Ma, Yong
    Chen, Fu
    Liu, Jianbo
    Yao, Wutao
    Shang, Erping
    REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 13 (04) : 1 - 19
  • [50] A Spatially Explicit Comparison of Quantitative and Categorical Modelling Approaches for Mapping Seabed Sediments Using Random Forest
    Misiuk, Benjamin
    Diesing, Markus
    Aitken, Alec
    Brown, Craig J.
    Edinger, Evan N.
    Bell, Trevor
    GEOSCIENCES, 2019, 9 (06)