The Feasibility of Anterior Spinal Access The Vascular Corridor at the L5-S1 Level for Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion

被引:9
|
作者
Ng, Julia Poh-Hwee [1 ]
Scott-Young, Matthew [2 ,3 ]
Chan, Daniel Nim-Cho [4 ]
Oh, Jacob Yoong-Leong [1 ]
机构
[1] Tan Tock Seng Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Div Spine Surg, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Gold Coast Spine, Gold Coast, Qld, Australia
[3] Bond Univ, Fac Hlth Sci & Med, Gold Coast, Qld, Australia
[4] Sengkang Gen Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Div Spine Surg, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
anterior spine surgery; iliocaval vasculature; imaging; interbody fusion; lumbosacral junction; lumbosacral region; magnetic resonance imaging; spine; surgical planning; vascular anatomy; VASCULAR ANATOMY; SURGERY; INJURY;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0000000000003948
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Cross-sectional study. Objective. To analyze the feasibility of anterior spinal access to the vascular corridor at the L5-S1 junction, by evaluating three crucial anatomical landmarks. This provides a framework for risk-stratification for the clinician during preoperative evaluation. Summary of Background Data. The anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) offers many advantages for fusion at the L5-S1 junction. However, the variant iliac vasculature may preclude safe anterior access. Methods. Five hundred magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images of the L5-S1 level were identified, with 379 meeting inclusion criteria. We graded the anterior access into three grades, namely, easy, advanced, or difficult by looking at three important anatomical landmarks-the vascular corridor (narrow if <= 25 mm, medium if 25-35mm [inclusive], and wide if >35 mm), the left common iliac vein (LCIV) location (grades AD based on the relative position of the LCIV to the L5-S1 disc space), and the presence or absence of a fat plane. Results. Our results showed that 43.27% of the patients had wide corridor for the anterior access, 19.26% of patients had no fat plane, and 7.65% had a LCIV that extended past the midline of the disc (Grade C, D: >50%). By combining these three factors, 37.20% would have easy anterior access, while a minority (1.85%) would have a difficult anterior access. Conclusion. The ALIF at L5-S1 offers significant benefits to the patient. The surgeon should be aware of the dangers in an anterior access by looking at three crucial factors to determine whether the access is easy, advanced, or difficult. Patients with a difficult access should be attempted by experts, vascular access surgeons, or consider an alternative approach to L5-S1.
引用
收藏
页码:983 / 989
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Simultaneous L5-S1 anterior lumbar interbody fusion and total hip arthroplasty through minimally invasive anterior approaches in hip-spine syndrome
    Bassani, R.
    Sirtori, P.
    Morselli, C.
    Cirullo, A.
    Ciliberto, R.
    Mangiavini, L.
    Peretti, G. M.
    JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL REGULATORS AND HOMEOSTATIC AGENTS, 2022, 36 (02): : 239 - 245
  • [32] Risk Assessment of Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Access in Degenerative Spinal Conditions
    Singh, Kern
    Cha, Elliot D. K.
    Lynch, Conor P.
    Nolte, Michael T.
    Parrish, James M.
    Jenkins, Nathaniel W.
    Jacob, Kevin C.
    Patel, Madhav R.
    Vanjani, Nisheka N.
    Pawlowski, Hanna
    Prabhu, Michael C.
    Myers, Jonathan A.
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2022, 35 (07): : E601 - E609
  • [33] Radiographic comparison of L5-S1 lateral anterior lumbar interbody fusion cage subsidence and displacement by fixation strategy: anterior plate versus integrated screws
    Theologis, Alekos A.
    Patel, Sohan
    Burch, Shane
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2023, 38 (01) : 126 - 130
  • [34] Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion With and Without an "Access Surgeon''
    Phan, Kevin
    Xu, Joshua
    Scherman, Daniel B.
    Rao, Prashanth J.
    Mobbs, Ralph J.
    SPINE, 2017, 42 (10) : E592 - E601
  • [35] Vascular complications of exposure for anterior lumbar interbody fusion
    Garg, Joy
    Woo, Karen
    Hirsch, Jodi
    Bruffey, James D.
    Dilley, Ralph B.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2010, 51 (04) : 946 - 950
  • [36] The anterior-to-psoas approach for interbody fusion at the L5-S1 segment: clinical and radiological outcomes
    Miscusi, Massimo
    Trungu, Sokol
    Ricciardi, Luca
    Forcato, Stefano
    Ramieri, Alessandro
    Raco, Antonino
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2020, 49 (03) : 1 - 8
  • [37] Assessment of L5-S1 anterior lumbar interbody fusion stability in the setting of lengthening posterior instrumentation constructs: a cadaveric biomechanical study
    McGrath, Kyle A.
    Schmidt, Eric S.
    Loss, Jeremy G.
    Gillespie, Callan M.
    Colbrunn, Robb W.
    Butler, Robert S.
    Steinmetz, Michael P.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2022, 36 (06) : 900 - 908
  • [38] Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion versus Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Posterior Instrumentation at L5/S1
    Jacob, Kevin C.
    Patel, Madhav R.
    Ribot, Max A.
    Parsons, Alexander W.
    Vanjani, Nisheka N.
    Pawlowski, Hanna
    Prabhu, Michael C.
    Singh, Kern
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 157 : E111 - E122
  • [39] Single-Level Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion at L5/S1 for an Obese Population
    Patel, Madhav Rajesh
    Jacob, Kevin Chacko
    Zamanian, Cameron
    Pawlowski, Hanna
    Prabhu, Michael Clifford
    Vanjani, Nisheka Navin
    Singh, Kern
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2023, 17 (02) : 293 - 303
  • [40] Safety and efficacy of stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion in low-grade L5-S1 isthmic spondylolisthesis
    Jesse, C. Marvin
    Schwarzenbach, Othmar
    Ulrich, Christian T.
    Hani, Levin
    Raabe, Andreas
    Schar, Ralph T.
    BRAIN AND SPINE, 2022, 2