Oral misoprostol versus combination of foley bulb catheter and oral misoprostol alone for induction of labor: A randomized controlled trial

被引：1
|
作者：
Graham, Kyle [1 ]
Maiuyen Nguyen [1 ]
Sit, Anita [1 ]
Morfin, Jussely [1 ]
Garabedian, Matthew [1 ]
机构：
[1] Santa Clara Valley Med Ctr, San Jose, CA 95128 USA
来源：
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY | 2018年 / 218卷 / 01期
关键词：
D O I：
10.1016/j.ajog.2017.10.353
中图分类号：
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号：
100211 ;
摘要：
417
引用
收藏
页码：S254 / S255
页数：2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Oral Misoprostol for Labor Augmentation: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Henderson, Cassandra E.
    Scripsema, Nicole
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 119 (04): : 869 - 869
  • [32] Oral Misoprostol for Labor Augmentation: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Bleich, April T.
    Villano, Kathryn S.
    Lo, Julie Y.
    Alexander, James M.
    McIntire, Donald D.
    Leveno, Kenneth J.
    OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2012, 67 (04) : 209 - 210
  • [33] Cost-effectiveness of misoprostol alone versus misoprostol plus foley catheter for induction of labor in term pregnancies
    Williams, Justin
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 216 (01) : S444 - S444
  • [34] Oral misoprostol, low dose vaginal misoprostol, and vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: Randomized controlled trial
    Young, David C.
    Delaney, Tina
    Armson, B. Anthony
    Fanning, Cora
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (01):
  • [35] Oral versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor: A double-blind randomized controlled trial
    Fisher, SA
    Mackenzie, VP
    Davies, GAL
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 185 (04) : 906 - 910
  • [36] Labour induction at term - a randomised trial comparing Foley catheter plus titrated oral misoprostol solution, titrated oral misoprostol solution alone, and dinoprostone
    Matonhodze, BB
    Hofmeyr, GJ
    Levin, J
    SAMJ SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 93 (05): : 375 - 379
  • [37] Oral Misoprostol and Vaginal Isosorbide Mononitrate for Labor Induction A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Collingham, Justin P.
    Fuh, Katherine C.
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    Pullen, Kristin M.
    Lyell, Deirdre J.
    El-Sayed, Yasser Y.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 116 (01): : 121 - 126
  • [38] Comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term: A randomized controlled trial
    Paungmora, N
    Herabutya, Y
    O-Prasertsawat, P
    Punyavachira, P
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2004, 30 (05) : 358 - 362
  • [39] Oral and vaginal misoprostol compared with dinoprostone for induction of labor: A randomized controlled trial
    le Roux, PA
    Olarogun, JO
    Penny, J
    Anthony, J
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 99 (02): : 201 - 205
  • [40] Titrated oral compared with vaginal misoprostol for labor induction - A randomized controlled trial
    Cheng, Shi-Yann
    Ming, Ho
    Lee, Jui-Chi
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 111 (01): : 119 - 125
12345