Performance prediction of PTR for different pressure waveforms

被引:0
|
作者
Desai, S. [1 ]
Desai, K. P. [2 ]
Naik, H. B. [2 ]
Atrey, M. D. [3 ]
机构
[1] CK Pithawala Coll Engn, Surat 394550, Gujarat, India
[2] SV Natl Inst Technol, Surat 395007, India
[3] Indian Inst Technol, Bombay 400076, Maharashtra, India
关键词
pressure waveform; double inlet pulse tube refrigerator;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Many researchers have shown that pulse tube refrigerator (PTR) performance depends significantly on the pressure waveforms generated by the rotary valve in a Gifford McMahon (GM) type PTR. Some literature has shown this effect experimentally for various waveforms. The design of the rotary valve therefore is very critical in order to generate an optimum pressure waveform. However, if the optimum waveform for obtaining maximum cooling power is known, it will help the valve design significantly. In view of this, the valve design would be improved significantly if the performance of the PTR could be predicted with reasonable accuracy for any pressure waveform. The present paper aims at developing a procedure to generate such predictions of the PTR performance for different pressure waveforms. This will help to determine an optimum pressure waveform for a given PTR configuration and will be useful in a significant way for the design of the rotary valve. An isothermal model of the PTR has been developed for various operational modes viz, Basic, Orifice pulse tube refrigerator (OPTR), double inlet pulse tube refrigerator (DIPTR), and has been validated with experimental results. The model is then extended to predict the PTR performance for various pressure waveforms. The experimental data, available in literature in the form of different pressure waves for a given PTR configuration, has then been analyzed. A comparison between the experimental results and the model predictions has been presented.
引用
收藏
页码:1691 / +
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Prediction of pressure equalization performance of rainscreen walls
    Suresh Kumar, K.
    Van Schijndel, A.W.M.
    Wind and Structures, An International Journal, 1999, 2 (04): : 325 - 345
  • [32] Experimental performance investigation of an active magnetic regenerator subject to different fluid flow waveforms
    Teyber, R.
    Trevizoli, P. V.
    Niknia, I.
    Christiaanse, T. V.
    Govindappa, P.
    Rowe, A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REFRIGERATION, 2017, 74 : 38 - 46
  • [33] Damped and Ventricularized Coronary Pressure Waveforms
    Klein, Lloyd W.
    Korpu, Divya
    JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 29 (11): : 387 - 389
  • [34] SPIKES ON SONIC BOOM PRESSURE WAVEFORMS
    PIERCE, AD
    BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY, 1968, 13 (07): : 952 - &
  • [35] Haptic Palpation of Aortic Pressure Waveforms
    LeClair, Alexander
    Wolfer, James
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2015 3RD EXPERIMENT AT INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE (EXP AT'15), 2015, : 116 - +
  • [36] Prediction of arterial blood pressure waveforms from photoplethysmogram signals via fully convolutional neural networks
    Cheng, Juan
    Xu, Yufei
    Song, Rencheng
    Liu, Yu
    Li, Chang
    Chen, Xun
    COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2021, 138
  • [37] Performance of pressure-exchange ejector at different port pressure
    Zhao, Wenjing
    Hu, Dapeng
    Liu, Peiqi
    Dai, Yuqiang
    Zhao, Jiaquan
    EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 422 : 697 - 700
  • [38] Pressure fluctuations analysis on the powder fluidization performance at different pressure
    Sun, Haijun
    Hu, Chunbo
    Xu, Yihua
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIPHASE FLOW, 2019, 116 : 176 - 184
  • [39] Signals in bioimpedance measurement: different waveforms for different tasks
    Min, M.
    Pliquett, U.
    Nacke, T.
    Barthe, A.
    Annus, P.
    Land, R.
    13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL BIOIMPEDANCE AND THE 8TH CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL IMPEDANCE TOMOGRAPHY 2007, 2007, 17 : 181 - +
  • [40] PREDICTION OF DIFFERENT CRITERIA OF LAW SCHOOL PERFORMANCE
    LUNNEBORG, CE
    LUNNEBOR.PW
    EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1966, 26 (04) : 935 - +