Efficacy and radiographic analysis of oblique lumbar interbody fusion in treating adult spinal deformity

被引:9
|
作者
Jo, Dae-Jean [1 ]
Seo, Eun-Min [2 ]
机构
[1] Kyung Hee Univ, Hosp Gangdong, Spine Ctr, Dept Neurosurg, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Hallym Univ, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Orthoped Surg, Chunchon, South Korea
来源
PLOS ONE | 2021年 / 16卷 / 09期
关键词
DEGENERATIVE SCOLIOSIS; SURGICAL-TREATMENT; LATERAL APPROACH; OUTCOMES; PARAMETERS; COMPLICATIONS; DIFFERENCE; STRATEGIES;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0257316
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Adult spinal deformity (ASD) is usually rigid and requires a combined anterior-posterior approach for deformity correction. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) allows direct access to the disc space and placement of a large interbody graft. A larger interbody graft facilitates correction of ASD. However, an anterior approach carries significant risks. Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) through a minimally invasive approach has recently been used for ASD. The present study was performed to evaluate the effectiveness of oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) in the treatment of ASD. We performed a retrospective study utilizing the data of 74 patients with ASD. The inclusion criteria were lumbar coronal Cobb angle > 20 degrees, pelvic incidence (PI)-lumbar lordosis (LL) mismatch > 10 degrees, and minimum follow-up of 2 years. Patients were divided into two groups: ALIF combined with posterior spinal fixation (ALIF+PSF) (n = 38) and OLIF combined with posterior spinal fixation (OLIF+PSF) (n = 36). The perioperative spinal deformity radiographic parameters, complications, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes were assessed and compared between the two groups. The preoperative sagittal vertical axis (SVA), LL, PI-LL mismatch, and lumbar Cobb angles were similar between the two groups. Patients in the OLIF+PSF group had a slightly higher mean number of interbody fusion levels than those in the ALIF+PSF group. At the final follow-up, all radiographic parameters and HRQoL scores were similar between the two groups. However, the rates of perioperative complications were higher in the ALIF+PSF than OLIF+PSF group. The ALIF+PSF and OLIF+PSF groups showed similar radiographic and HRQoL outcomes. These observations suggest that OLIF is a safe and reliable surgical treatment option for ASD.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Comparison of Hidden Blood Loss Between Multilevel Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Adult Spinal Deformity Patients
    Kinoshita, Hayato
    Abe, Eiji
    Kobayashi, Takashi
    Hongo, Michio
    Kasukawa, Yuji
    Kikuchi, Kazuma
    Kudo, Daisuke
    Kimura, Ryota
    Miyakoshi, Naohisa
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2023,
  • [22] What Are the Benefits of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion on the Treatment of Adult Spinal Deformity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Deformity
    Yang, Honghao
    Liu, Jingwei
    Hai, Yong
    Han, Bo
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2023, 13 (01) : 172 - 187
  • [23] Comparative analysis of the efficacy of oblique lateral interbody fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation
    Chen, Daodong
    Liu, Tao
    Du, Kunyang
    Zhu, Zhenjun
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [24] Differences in radiographic and clinical outcomes of oblique lateral interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar disease: a meta-analysis
    Li, Hui-Min
    Zhang, Ren-Jie
    Shen, Cai-Liang
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2019, 20 (01)
  • [25] Differences in radiographic and clinical outcomes of oblique lateral interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar disease: a meta-analysis
    Hui-Min Li
    Ren-Jie Zhang
    Cai-Liang Shen
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 20
  • [26] Surgical Outcomes of Multilevel Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion versus Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Correction of Adult Spinal Deformity: A Comparative Clinical Study
    Iwamae, Masayoshi
    Matsumura, Akira
    Namikawa, Takashi
    Kato, Minori
    Hori, Yusuke
    Yabu, Akito
    Sawada, Yuta
    Hidaka, Noriaki
    Nakamura, Hiroaki
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2020, 14 (04) : 421 - 429
  • [27] Radiographic analysis of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of adult isthmic spondylolisthesis
    Kwon, BK
    Berta, S
    Daffner, SD
    Vaccaro, AR
    Hilibrand, AS
    Grauer, JN
    Beiner, J
    Albert, TJ
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2003, 16 (05): : 469 - 476
  • [28] Efficacy of oblique lumbar interbody fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xi-yong Li
    Yun-lu Wang
    Su Yang
    Chang-sheng Liao
    Song-feng Li
    Peng-yong Han
    Peng-fei Han
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2023, 143 : 5657 - 5670
  • [29] Efficacy of oblique lumbar interbody fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Xi-yong
    Wang, Yun-lu
    Yang, Su
    Liao, Chang-sheng
    Li, Song-feng
    Han, Peng-yong
    Han, Peng-fei
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2023, 143 (09) : 5657 - 5670
  • [30] Efficacy and Safety of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Liu, Ai-Feng
    Guo, Tian-Ci
    Chen, Ji-Xin
    Yu, Wei-Jie
    Feng, Hui-Chuan
    Niu, Pu-Yu
    Zhai, Jing-Bo
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 158 : E964 - E974