When Preschoolers Interact with an Educational Robot, Does Robot Feedback Influence Engagement?

被引:5
|
作者
de Haas, Mirjam [1 ,2 ]
Vogt, Paul [1 ,3 ]
Krahmer, Emiel [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Tilburg Univ, Tilburg Sch Humanities & Digital Sci, Dept Cognit Sci & Artificial Intelligence, NL-5037 AB Tilburg, Netherlands
[2] Tilburg Univ, Tilburg Ctr Cognit & Commun, NL-5037 AB Tilburg, Netherlands
[3] Hanze Univ Appl Sci, Sch Commun Media & IT, NL-9747 AS Groningen, Netherlands
[4] Tilburg Univ, Dept Commun & Cognit, NL-5037 AB Tilburg, Netherlands
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
child-robot interaction; engagement; second-language learning; robot tutor; preschool children; SOCIAL ROBOTS; SCHOOL ENGAGEMENT; CHILDREN; CLASSROOM; PEER; INTERVENTIONS; METAANALYSIS; ACHIEVEMENT; ATTENTION; AGE;
D O I
10.3390/mti5120077
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In this paper, we examine to what degree children of 3-4 years old engage with a task and with a social robot during a second-language tutoring lesson. We specifically investigated whether children's task engagement and robot engagement were influenced by three different feedback types by the robot: adult-like feedback, peer-like feedback and no feedback. Additionally, we investigated the relation between children's eye gaze fixations and their task engagement and robot engagement. Fifty-eight Dutch children participated in an English counting task with a social robot and physical blocks. We found that, overall, children in the three conditions showed similar task engagement and robot engagement; however, within each condition, they showed large individual differences. Additionally, regression analyses revealed that there is a relation between children's eye-gaze direction and engagement. Our findings showed that although eye gaze plays a significant role in measuring engagement and can be used to model children's task engagement and robot engagement, it does not account for the full concept and engagement still comprises more than just eye gaze.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A win-win situation: Does familiarity with a social robot modulate feedback monitoring and learning?
    Abdulaziz Abubshait
    Paul J. Beatty
    Craig G. McDonald
    Cameron D. Hassall
    Olav E. Krigolson
    Eva Wiese
    Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2021, 21 : 763 - 775
  • [42] Robot's adaptive emotional feedback sustains children's social engagement and promotes their vocabulary learning: a long-term child-robot interaction study
    Ahmad, Muneeb Imtiaz
    Mubin, Omar
    Shahid, Suleman
    Orlando, Joanne
    ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR, 2019, 27 (04) : 243 - 266
  • [43] The Influence of Absorption and Need for Cognition on Students' Learning Outcomes in Educational Robot-Supported Projects
    Pellas, Nikolaos
    Tzafilkou, Katerina
    EDUCATION SCIENCES, 2023, 13 (04):
  • [44] Does attributing mental states to a robot influence accessibility of information represented during reading?
    Abubshait, Abdulaziz
    Siri, Giulia
    Wykowska, Agnieszka
    ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2022, 228
  • [45] Correction to: A win-win situation: Does familiarity with a social robot modulate feedback monitoring and learning?
    Abdulaziz Abubshait
    Paul J. Beatty
    Craig G. McDonald
    Cameron D. Hassall
    Olav E. Krigolson
    Eva Wiese
    Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2021, 21 : 678 - 678
  • [46] Why effectiveness of robot-mediated neurorehabilitation does not necessarily influence its adoption
    Turchetti, Giuseppe
    Vitiello, Nicola
    Trieste, Leopoldo
    Romiti, Stefano
    Geisler, Elie
    Micera, Silvestro
    IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering, 2014, 7 : 143 - 153
  • [47] Influence of a Humanoid Robot in Human Decision-Making When Using Direct & Indirect Requests
    Lopez, Alexander
    Penaloza, Christian
    Cuellar, Francisco
    ELEVENTH ACM/IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMAN ROBOT INTERACTION (HRI'16), 2016, : 473 - 474
  • [48] The engagement of students when learning to use a personal audio classifier to control robot cars in a computational thinking board game
    Hsu, Ting-Chia
    Chen, Mu-Sheng
    RESEARCH AND PRACTICE IN TECHNOLOGY ENHANCED LEARNING, 2022, 17 (01)
  • [49] Does giving students feedback on their concept maps through an on-screen avatar or a humanoid robot make a difference?
    Sisman, Burak
    Steinruecke, Johannes
    de Jong, Ton
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ROBOTICS, 2024, 16 (08) : 1783 - 1796
  • [50] Robot-assisted training to improve proprioception does benefit from added vibro-tactile feedback
    Cuppone, A.
    Squeri, V.
    Semprini, M.
    Konczak, J.
    2015 37TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY (EMBC), 2015, : 258 - 261