Rhizobacteria associated with organic materials in the control of root-knot nematode in tomato

被引:2
|
作者
Silva, Fabiola J. [1 ]
Ribeiro, Regina C. F. [1 ]
Xavier, Adelica A. [1 ]
Santos Neto, Jose A. [1 ]
Souza, Maione A. [1 ]
Dias-Arieira, Claudia R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estadual Montes Claros UNIMONTES, Janauba, MG, Brazil
[2] Univ Estadual Maringa, Sao Cristovao, PR, Brazil
关键词
Lycopersicon esculentum; Meloidogyne [!text type='java']java[!/text]nica; Bacillus pumilus; biological control; organic matter; MELOIDOGYNE-[!text type='JAVA']JAVA[!/text]NICA; SPP;
D O I
10.1590/S0102-053620160000100009
中图分类号
S6 [园艺];
学科分类号
0902 ;
摘要
Biological control agents associated with organic matter is a strategy that can enhance the control of root-knot nematode. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of organic materials and rhizobacteria on Meloidogyne javanica on tomato. We used the randomized block design, in a 4x2+1 factorial scheme, four organic materials (peat, bio-fertilizer, manure and organic compound of pequi hulls), two isolates of rhizobacteria (Bacillus pumilus-1 and B. pumilus-76) and mineral fertilization alone (additional treatment), with eight replications. Tomato seedlings were transplanted to pots containing sandy soil, in which the different organic materials were incorporated. Suspensions of rhizobacteria (OD540 = 0.5) were applied to soil by means of irrigation. The soil in each pot was infested with approximately 3,000 eggs and eventual second stage juveniles (J2) of M. javanica. All organic materials associated with rhizobacteria reduced the number of galls and masses of M. javanica eggs compared to mineral fertilizer. The number of juveniles (J2) was lower in combinations pequi + B. pumilus-1 and B. pumilus-76 and peat + B. pumilus-1. The number of eggs and the reproduction factor were influenced by the interaction between rhizobacteria and organic materials. For the compound of pequi, B. pumilus-1 produced a lower number of eggs per gram of root, while for peat, B. pumilus-76 was the most efficient. For the reproduction factor, only the manure was influenced by the bacterium, and B. pumilus-1 was the one that provided lower reproductive capacity of the nematode.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 65
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] EARLY STEPS OF TOMATO BREEDING RESIST TO ROOT-KNOT NEMATODE
    Murti, Rudi Hari
    Muamiroh, Fardatun
    Pujiati, Tata Rina Wahyu
    Indarti, Siwi
    AGRIVITA, 2012, 34 (03): : 270 - 277
  • [32] THE INTERACTION OF SO2 AND ROOT-KNOT NEMATODE ON TOMATO
    KHAN, MR
    KHAN, MW
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 1993, 81 (02) : 91 - 102
  • [33] CONTROL OF ROOT-KNOT NEMATODES ON TOMATO BY LECTINS
    MARBANMENDOZA, N
    JEYAPRAKASH, A
    JANSSON, HB
    DAMON, RA
    ZUCKERMAN, BM
    JOURNAL OF NEMATOLOGY, 1987, 19 (03) : 331 - 335
  • [34] Essential oils as soil biofumigants for the control of the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita on tomato
    Laquale, S.
    Candido, V.
    Avato, P.
    Argentieri, M. P.
    D'Addabbo, T.
    ANNALS OF APPLIED BIOLOGY, 2015, 167 (02) : 217 - 224
  • [35] ROOT-KNOT NEMATODE CONTROL WITH DIMETHYL DISULFIDE (DMDS) IN PROTECTED TOMATO AND MELON IN ITALY
    Sasanelli, Nicola
    Leocata, Salvatore
    Dongiovanni, Crescenza
    Santori, Alberto
    Myrta, Arben
    SCIENTIFIC PAPERS-SERIES B-HORTICULTURE, 2019, 63 (01): : 335 - 339
  • [37] Root-knot nematode effectors and their role in the tomato root interactome during infection
    Stojilkovic, B.
    Gheysen, G.
    MOLECULAR PLANT-MICROBE INTERACTIONS, 2019, 32 (10) : 146 - 146
  • [38] CONTROL OF THE ROOT-KNOT NEMATODE, MELOIDOGYNE INCOGNITA, IN ORGANIC PROTECTED CROPS IN SICILY
    Colombo, Antonio
    Cataldi, Salvatore
    Marano, Giuseppe
    Genna, Giacomo
    REDIA-GIORNALE DI ZOOLOGIA, 2011, 94 : 127 - 131
  • [39] FREE PHENOLS AND ROOT NECROSIS IN NEMATEX TOMATO INFECTED WITH ROOT-KNOT NEMATODE
    BRUESKE, CH
    DROPKIN, VH
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1973, 63 (03) : 329 - 334
  • [40] EXCISED TOMATO ROOT CULTURE AS A TOOL FOR TESTING ROOT-KNOT NEMATODE RESISTANCE
    ORION, D
    PILOWSKY, M
    PHYTOPARASITICA, 1984, 12 (01) : 71 - 73