Effect of institutional and firm-specific characteristics on post-privatization performance: Evidence from developed countries

被引:94
|
作者
D'Souza, J
Megginson, W
Nash, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Wake Forest Univ, Babcock Grad Sch Management, Winston Salem, NC 27109 USA
[2] Clayton State Coll & Univ, Dept Finance, Morrow, GA 30260 USA
[3] Univ Oklahoma, Price Coll Business, Norman, OK 73019 USA
关键词
privatization; corporate governance;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2004.12.001
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This study adds to the empirical evidence that privatization improves the performance of divested firms and offers preliminary evidence as to why these performance improvements occur. Using a sample of 129 share-issue privatizations from 23 developed (OECD) countries, we first document significant increases in profitability, efficiency, output, and capital expenditure following privatization. Our data indicate that ownership (both private and foreign), degree of economic freedom, and level of capital market development significantly affect post-privatization performance. A comparison to the findings of Boubakri et al. (2005) [Boubakri, N., Cosset, J., Guedmani, O., 2005. Liberalization, corporate governance, and the performance of newly privatized firms. Journal of Corporate Finance (this issue)] suggests that several determinants of post-privatization performance improvements differ between developed and developing countries. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:747 / 766
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] CEO overconfidence, firm-specific factors, and systemic risk: evidence from China
    Safi, Adnan
    Yi, Xianrong
    Wahab, Salman
    Chen, Yingying
    Hassan, Hassan
    RISK MANAGEMENT-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2021, 23 (1-2): : 30 - 47
  • [42] Firm-specific attributes and contrarian profits: Evidence from the Taiwan stock exchange
    Cheng, Chu-Chun
    Liu, Day-Yang
    Huang, Yen-Sheng
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, 2010, 4 (17): : 3837 - 3845
  • [43] CEO overconfidence, firm-specific factors, and systemic risk: evidence from China
    Adnan Safi
    Xianrong Yi
    Salman Wahab
    Yingying Chen
    Hassan Hassan
    Risk Management, 2021, 23 : 30 - 47
  • [44] Firm-specific exchange rate shocks and employment adjustment: Evidence from China
    Dai, Mi
    Xu, Jianwei
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 108 : 54 - 66
  • [45] Firm-specific marketing capital and job satisfaction of marketers Evidence from Vietnam
    Tho D. Nguyen
    Trang T. M. Nguyen
    LEARNING ORGANIZATION, 2011, 18 (03): : 251 - +
  • [46] Assessing international financial integration: do industry and firm-specific characteristics matter? Evidence from the Japanese market
    Chen, Mei-Ping
    Chung, Dai-Tzung
    Lin, Yu-Hui
    ECONOMIC RESEARCH-EKONOMSKA ISTRAZIVANJA, 2018, 31 (01): : 860 - 879
  • [47] Institutional investors and firm performance: Evidence from IPOs
    Michel, Allen
    Oded, Jacob
    Shaked, Israel
    NORTH AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2020, 51
  • [48] Macroeconomic and firm-specific determinants of financial performance: Evidence from non-life insurance companies in Africa
    Msomi, Thabiso Sthembiso
    COGENT BUSINESS & MANAGEMENT, 2023, 10 (01):
  • [49] Firm value and the use of financial derivatives: Evidence from developed countries
    Ayadi, Mohamed A.
    Cyr, Donald A.
    Lazrak, Skander
    Lu, Zhangwei
    REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2024, 42 (03) : 258 - 280
  • [50] Privatization incidence, ownership forms, and firm performance: Evidence from Slovenia
    Smith, SC
    Cin, BC
    Vodopivec, M
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE ECONOMICS, 1997, 25 (02) : 158 - 179