Addition of salmeterol versus doubling the dose of fluticasone propionate in patients with mild to moderate asthma

被引:95
|
作者
van Noord, JA [1 ]
Schreurs, AJM
Mol, SJM
Mulder, PGH
机构
[1] Atrium Med Ctr, Dept Resp Dis, NL-6419 PC Heerlen, Netherlands
[2] Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] St Joseph Hosp, Veldhoven, Netherlands
[4] Erasmus Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
salmeterol; fluticasone propionate; asthma;
D O I
10.1136/thx.54.3.207
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background-The objective of this multicentre, randomised, double blind, parallel group study was to compare the efficacy and safety of the addition of salmeterol with that of doubling the dose of fluticasone propionate in asthmatic patients not controlled by a low or intermediate dose of inhaled corticosteroids. Methods-After a four week run in period of treatment with fluticasone propionate (100 mu g twice daily if pre-trial dose was 400-600 mu g inhaled corticosteroids or 250 mu g twice daily if pre-trial dose was 800-1200 mu g inhaled corticosteroids), 274 patients were randomised to treatment for 12 weeks with either salmeterol 50 mu g twice daily plus the run in dose of fluticasone propionate or twice the run in dose of fluticasone propionate (200 or 500 mu g twice daily). Outcome measures were daily records of peak expiratory flow (PEF), symptom scores, and clinic lung function. Results-The improvements in both the morning and evening PEF were better in the salmeterol than in the fluticasone propionate group, the mean increase in morning PEF being 19 l/min higher (95% CI 11.0 to 26.1) and in evening PEF being 16 l/min (95% CI 18.4 to 24.0) higher in the salmeterol group. The increase in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV,) was 0.09 1 greater in the salmeterol group than in the fluticasone propionate group after four weeks of treatment (95% CI 0.01 to 0.18), but not after 12 weeks. Both regimens showed an increase in symptom free low or days and a reduction in the need for steroids. rescue salbutamol both during the day and the night, but these improvements were greater in the salmeterol group. There were no significant differences between the groups in adverse effects or in the number of rescue courses of oral corticosteroids. Conclusions-In this group of patients still symptomatic despite 100 or 250 mu g fluticasone propionate twice daily, the addition of salmeterol caused a greater improvement in lung function and symptom control than doubling the dose of fluticasone propionate.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 212
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Impact of adherence to treatment with fluticasone propionate/salmeterol in asthma patients
    Ismaila, A.
    Corriveau, D.
    Vaillancourt, J.
    Parsons, D.
    Stanford, R.
    Su, Z.
    Sampalis, J. S.
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2014, 30 (07) : 1417 - 1425
  • [32] Prediction Of Asthma Symptom Burden In Subjects Dispensed Low/Moderate Dose Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol (FSC) or Moderate/High Dose Fluticasone Propionate (FP) in Subjects Without History of ICS Use
    Stanford, R. H.
    Riedel, A.
    Burke, J.
    Borah, B.
    Kulakodlu, M.
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2010, 125 (02) : AB71 - AB71
  • [33] Cost effectiveness of fluticasone propionate plus salmeterol versus fluticasone propionate plus montelukast in the treatment of persistent asthma
    O'Connor, RD
    Nelson, H
    Borker, R
    Emmett, A
    Jhingran, P
    Rickard, K
    Dorinsky, P
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2004, 22 (12) : 815 - 825
  • [34] Cost Effectiveness of Fluticasone Propionate Plus Salmeterol Versus Fluticasone Propionate Plus Montelukast in the Treatment of Persistent Asthma
    Richard D. O’Connor
    Harold Nelson
    Rohit Borker
    Amanda Emmett
    Priti Jhingran
    Kathleen Rickard
    Paul Dorinsky
    PharmacoEconomics, 2004, 22 : 815 - 825
  • [35] Salmeterol and Fluticasone Propionate in Children with Asthma REPLY
    Stempel, David A.
    Szefler, Stanley J.
    Pascoe, Steven J.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2016, 375 (22): : E46 - E46
  • [36] Cost-Effectiveness and Cost-Utility of Beclomethasone/Formoterol versus Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol in Patients with Moderate to Severe Asthma
    Gerzeli, Simone
    Rognoni, Carla
    Quaglini, Silvana
    Cavallo, Maria Caterina
    Cremonesi, Giovanni
    Papi, Alberto
    CLINICAL DRUG INVESTIGATION, 2012, 32 (04) : 253 - 265
  • [37] Cost-Effectiveness and Cost-Utility of Beclomethasone/Formoterol versus Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol in Patients with Moderate to Severe Asthma
    Simone Gerzeli
    Carla Rognoni
    Silvana Quaglini
    Maria Caterina Cavallo
    Giovanni Cremonesi
    Alberto Papi
    Clinical Drug Investigation, 2012, 32 : 253 - 265
  • [38] FLUTICASONE PROPIONATE AND FLUTICASONE PROPIONATE/SALMETEROL MULTIDOSE DRY POWDER INHALER PHARMACOKINETICS IN PATIENTS WITH PERSISTENT ASTHMA
    Ratner, P.
    Yiu, G.
    Nugent, C.
    Song, S.
    Caracta, C.
    ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, 2016, 117 (05) : S65 - S66
  • [39] CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS AND COST IMPACT OF INITIATING OR CHANGING TO FLUTICASONE PROPIONATE/FORMOTEROL VERSUS TREATMENT WITH FLUTICASONE PROPIONATE/SALMETEROL IN UK PATIENTS WITH ASTHMA
    Yau, Simon
    Small, Iain
    Wolfe, Stephanie
    Hamil, John
    Gruffydd-Jones, Kevin
    Daly, Cathal
    Price, David
    RESPIROLOGY, 2015, 20 : 19 - 19
  • [40] Effectiveness of fluticasone propionate in patients with moderate asthma: A dose-ranging study
    Wolfe, JD
    Selner, JC
    Mendelson, LM
    Hampel, F
    Schaberg, A
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 1996, 18 (04) : 635 - 646