On the use of event-related potentials to auditory stimuli in the Go/NoGo task

被引:18
|
作者
Smith, Janette Louise [1 ]
Douglas, Kelly Maree [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Newcastle, Sch Psychol, Ourimbah, NSW 2258, Australia
关键词
Response inhibition; Response conflict; Modality-specific effect; Perceptual overlap; EXECUTIVE CONTROL; ERP COMPONENTS; RESPONSE-INHIBITION; ATTENTION; N2; SCHIZOPHRENIA; REFLECTS; CONFLICT; DISORDER; MODALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.pscychresns.2011.03.002
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
The N2 and P3 components of the event-related potential (ERP) are putative markers of inhibition in the Go/NoGo task. If this is the case, they should be unaffected by stimulus presentation modality. Theoretical researchers have suggested that the effect is smaller or absent with auditory stimuli, while others have shown that the effect depends on the perceptual similarity of the stimuli. Meanwhile, clinical researchers appear to be unaware of the debate. This study examined the N2 and P3 NoGo effects elicited by five sets of auditory stimuli varying in perceptual similarity. The N2 NoGo effect was significant for similar and different letters, and for similar tones, but not for different tones or novel sounds. As expected by the perceptual overlap hypothesis, the largest N2 NoGo effect was observed with the similar letters. In contrast, the P3 NoGo effect was significant and of a similar magnitude for all stimulus sets. The differential effect of the stimulus sets suggests separable underlying processes reflected in N2 and P3. Guidelines are provided for clinical researchers wishing to use auditory stimuli in the Go/NoGo task. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:177 / 181
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Event-related potentials in response to 3-D auditory stimuli
    Fuchigami, Tatsuo
    Okubo, Osami
    Fujita, Yukihiko
    Kohira, Ryutaro
    Arakawa, Chikako
    Endo, Ayumi
    Haruyama, Wakako
    Imai, Yuki
    Mugishima, Hideo
    BRAIN & DEVELOPMENT, 2009, 31 (08): : 577 - 581
  • [42] Auditory click stimuli evoke event-related potentials in the visual cortex
    Pockett, Susan
    Purdy, Suzanne C.
    Brennan, Barry J.
    Holmes, Mark D.
    NEUROREPORT, 2013, 24 (15) : 837 - 840
  • [44] Human event-related brain potentials to auditory periodic noise stimuli
    Kaernbach, C
    Schröger, E
    Gunter, TC
    NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 1998, 242 (01) : 17 - 20
  • [45] Preparatory slow potentials and event-related potentials in an auditory cued attention task
    Golob, EJ
    Pratt, H
    Starr, A
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 113 (10) : 1544 - 1557
  • [46] Mobile phone usage of early adolescent and event-related brain potentials during Go/NoGo task: The Hokkaido study
    Yamazaki, K.
    Tamura, N.
    Itoh, M.
    Yoshikawa, T.
    Miyashita, C.
    Ikeda-Araki, A.
    Kishi, R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2023, 188 : 111 - 111
  • [47] Is Visual Prediction Impaired in Adolescents with Autism spectrum Disorder? Event-Related Potentials in a Cued Visual GO/NOGO Task
    Hager, Linda A.
    Hoyland, Anne L.
    Kropotov, Juri D.
    Johnels, Jakob Asberg
    Weidle, Benhard
    Hollup, Stig
    Gillberg, Christopher
    Billstedt, Eva
    Ogrim, Geir
    CLINICAL EEG AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2024, 55 (04) : 406 - 416
  • [48] Differences in Implicit Attitudes in West and East Germans as Measured by the Go/NoGo Association Task and Event-related EEG Potentials
    Wagner-Altendorf, Tobias A.
    van der Lugt, Arie H.
    Kroeber, Anna
    Cirkel, Anna
    Heldmann, Marcus
    Muente, Thomas F.
    COGNITIVE AND BEHAVIORAL NEUROLOGY, 2023, 36 (03) : 145 - 158
  • [49] Event-related potentials to visual, auditory, and bimodal (combined auditory-visual) stimuli
    Isoglu-Alkac, Ummuhan
    Kedzior, Karina
    Keskindemirci, Gonca
    Ermutlu, Numan
    Karamursel, Sacit
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2007, 117 (02) : 259 - 273
  • [50] A study on the neural mechanism of inhibition of return by the event-related potential in the Go/Nogo task
    Tian, Yin
    Yao, Dezhong
    BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 79 (02) : 171 - 178