Impact of new non-cytotoxics in the treatment of ovarian cancer

被引:5
|
作者
Eisenhauer, E
Dancey, J
机构
[1] Queens Univ, NCIC Clin Trials Grp, IND Program, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
[2] NCI, Canc Therapy Evaluat Program, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1046/j.1525-1438.2001.11(suppl.1)sup1068.x
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Over the last decade, a number of new cytotoxic chemotherapy agents have shown evidence of antitumor activity in patients with ovarian carcinoma. These agents are currently being evaluated in large multinational randomized trials to determine whether their addition either concurrently or sequentially to standard paclitaxel and carboplatin regimens will result in improved survival. Whether these new combinations will provide additional benefit may be uncertain; however, it is certain that additional toxicity will limit the continued evaluation of the strategy of adding cytotoxics together. New approaches to improve the systemic therapy of ovarian cancer need to be explored. The next decade will see many trials of non-cytotoxics having a wide range of subcellular and extracellular targets. Many of these targets are abnormally expressed in a variety of solid tumors; thus, it is expected that many of these agents will be appropriate to evaluate in patients with ovarian carcinoma. Based on promising data from preclinical and early clinical studies as well as the presumed applicability of these targets to ovarian carcinoma, the inhibitors of growth factor receptors such as epidermal growth factor receptor and inhibitors of angiogenesis are of particular interest. Despite the interest of the investigators, the rapid evaluation of these target-specific non-cytotoxics is limited by the lack of accurate information on the expression of target in ovarian tumors and the relevance of target expression and its modulation to this tumor type. Early clinical trials are being designed to address these concerns; however, the clinical impact of non-cytotoxic agents in epithelial ovarian carcinoma patients must await the completion of randomized evaluations in combination with standard chemotherapeutic regimens.
引用
收藏
页码:68 / 72
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Impact of Geographic Variations in Treatment on Outcomes in Ovarian Cancer
    Dehaeck, Ulrike
    McGahan, Colleen E.
    Santos, Jennifer L.
    Carey, Mark S.
    Swenerton, Kenneth D.
    Kwon, Janice S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2013, 23 (02) : 282 - 287
  • [32] Platinum compounds: Their continued impact on ovarian cancer treatment
    Muggia, Franco M.
    Jimenez, Maria Garcia
    Murthy, Pooja
    INORGANICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2019, 496
  • [33] New Strategies in Ovarian Cancer: Translating the Molecular Complexity of Ovarian Cancer into Treatment Advances
    Liu, Joyce
    Matulonis, Ursula A.
    CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2014, 20 (20) : 5150 - 5156
  • [34] Neoadjuvant treatment in ovarian cancer: New perspectives, new challenges
    Nikolaidi, Adamantia
    Fountzilas, Elena
    Fostira, Florentia
    Psyrri, Amanda
    Gogas, Helen
    Papadimitriou, Christos
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [35] New non-cytotoxic approaches to ovarian cancer
    Kaye, SB
    Eisenhauer, EA
    Hamilton, TC
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1999, 10 : 65 - 68
  • [36] Applying time-dependent outcomes and Markov modelling to the economic evaluation of cytotoxics: A case study of Paclitaxel and Topotecan in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer
    Bethel, LM
    Stanley, A
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1997, 33 : OP3 - OP3
  • [37] Topotecan, a new drug for the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer
    Scarfone, G
    Villa, A
    Morana, S
    TUMORI, 1997, 83 (06) : S11 - S14
  • [39] New Approaches for Immune Directed Treatment for Ovarian Cancer
    Nicola Hardwick
    Paul H. Frankel
    Mihaela Cristea
    Current Treatment Options in Oncology, 2016, 17
  • [40] New agents for the treatment of ovarian cancer: the next generation
    Dupont, J
    Aghajanian, C
    Sabbatini, P
    Spriggs, DR
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2005, 15 : 252 - 257