Monomethyl Auristatin E Phosphate Inhibits Human Prostate Cancer Growth

被引:20
|
作者
Cunningham, David [1 ]
Parajuli, Keshab R. [1 ]
Zhang, Changde [2 ,3 ]
Wang, Guangdi [2 ,3 ]
Mei, Jiandong [1 ,4 ]
Zhang, Qiuyang [1 ]
Liu, Sen [1 ]
You, Zongbing [1 ,5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Tulane Univ, Dept Struct & Cellular Biol, New Orleans, LA 70118 USA
[2] Xavier Univ Louisiana, Dept Chem, New Orleans, LA USA
[3] Xavier Univ Louisiana, RCMI Canc Res Ctr, New Orleans, LA USA
[4] Sichuan Univ, West China Sch Med, West China Hosp, Dept Thorac Surg, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[5] Tulane Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg, New Orleans, LA 70118 USA
[6] Tulane Univ, Louisiana Canc Res Consortium, Tulane Canc Ctr, New Orleans, LA 70118 USA
[7] Tulane Univ, Tulane Ctr Stem Cell Res & Regenerat Med, New Orleans, LA 70118 USA
[8] Tulane Univ, Tulane Ctr Aging, New Orleans, LA 70118 USA
来源
PROSTATE | 2016年 / 76卷 / 15期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
prostate cancer; therapeutics; MMAEp; apoptosis; cell cycle; MITOTIC CATASTROPHE; MECHANISMS; CONJUGATE; METASTASIS; RADIUM-223; SURVIVAL; BREAST;
D O I
10.1002/pros.23226
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUNDBone metastasis from primary prostate cancer leads to markedly diminished quality of life with poor long-term survival. Bone seeking treatment options are limited with adverse consequences on rapidly proliferating tissues such as bone marrow. In the present study, we seek to determine the bone-enriching capabilities of monomethyl auristatin E phosphate (MMAEp), a derivative of the potent antimitotic monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE). METHODSThe in vitro actions and mechanisms of cytotoxicity were assessed using cell viability, immunofluorescence, flow cytometry, and Western blot analysis. In vivo efficacy was determined using an intratibial xenograft mouse model of human prostate cancer and live animal imaging. RESULTSThe half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of MMAE and MMAEp was determined to be approximately 2 and 48nM, respectively, in PC-3 and C4-2B cell lines. MMAEp retained the mechanism of action of MMAE in reducing microtubule polymerization and stalling cell cycle progression at the G2/M transition. MMAEp was able to bind hydroxyapatite in in vitro assays. MMAEp significantly reduced intratibial tumor growth compared to the vehicle control treatment. CONCLUSIONSMMAEp is an antimitotic compound that binds to calcium ions in the bone and inhibits prostate tumor growth in the bone. Prostate 76:1420-1430, 2016. (c) 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1420 / 1430
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Enfortumab Vedotin, a fully human monoclonal antibody against Nectin 4 conjugated to monomethyl auristatin E for metastatic urothelial Carcinoma
    McGregor, Bradley A.
    Sonpavde, Guru
    EXPERT OPINION ON INVESTIGATIONAL DRUGS, 2019, 28 (10) : 821 - 826
  • [22] Tumor-Specific Monomethyl Auristatin E (MMAE) Prodrug Nanoparticles for Safe and Effective Chemotherapy
    Cho, Hanhee
    Shim, Man Kyu
    Moon, Yujeong
    Song, Sukyung
    Kim, Jinseong
    Choi, Jiwoong
    Kim, Jeongrae
    Lee, Youngjoo
    Park, Jung Yeon
    Kim, Yongju
    Ahn, Cheol-Hee
    Kim, Mi Ra
    Yoon, Hong Yeol
    Kim, Kwangmeyung
    PHARMACEUTICS, 2022, 14 (10)
  • [23] Lycium barbarum Polysaccharides Induce Apoptosis in Human Prostate Cancer Cells and Inhibits Prostate Cancer Growth in a Xenograft Mouse Model of Human Prostate Cancer
    Luo, Qiong
    Li, Zhuoneng
    Yan, Jun
    Zhu, Fan
    Xu, Ruo-Jun
    Cai, Yi-Zhong
    JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL FOOD, 2009, 12 (04) : 695 - 703
  • [24] Peripheral neuropathy associated with monomethyl auristatin E-based antibody-drug conjugates
    Fu, Zhiwen
    Gao, Chen
    Wu, Tingting
    Wang, Lulu
    Li, Shijun
    Zhang, Yu
    Shi, Chen
    ISCIENCE, 2023, 26 (10)
  • [25] Synthesis, characterization, and targeted chemotherapy of SCT200-linker-monomethyl auristatin E conjugates
    Hu, Xinyue
    Jiang, Hailun
    Bai, Weiqi
    Liu, Xiujun
    Miao, Qingfang
    Wang, Linlin
    Jin, Jie
    Cui, Along
    Liu, Rui
    Li, Zhuorong
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2021, 216
  • [26] Synthesis, Characterization, and Preclinical Evaluation of a Small-Molecule Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Targeted Monomethyl Auristatin E Conjugate
    Machulkin, Aleksei E.
    Uspenskaya, Anastasia A.
    Zyk, Nikolay U.
    Nimenko, Ekaterina A.
    Ber, Anton P.
    Petrov, Stanislav A.
    Polshakov, Vladimir, I
    Shafikov, Radik R.
    Skvortsov, Dmitry A.
    Plotnikova, Ekaterina A.
    Pankratov, Andrei A.
    Smirnova, Galina B.
    Borisova, Yulia A.
    Pokrovsky, Vadim S.
    Kolmogorov, Vasilii S.
    Vaneev, Alexander N.
    Khudyakov, Alexander D.
    Chepikova, Olga E.
    Kovalev, Sergey
    Zamyatnin, Andrey A., Jr.
    Erofeev, Alexander
    Gorelkin, Petr
    Beloglazkina, Elena K.
    Zyk, Nikolay, V
    Khazanova, Elena S.
    Majouga, Alexander G.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2021, 64 (23) : 17123 - 17145
  • [27] A Wireframe DNA Cube: Antibody Conjugate for Targeted Delivery of Multiple Copies of Monomethyl Auristatin E
    Marcher, Anders
    Nijenhuis, Minke A. D.
    Gothelf, Kurt V.
    ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION, 2021, 60 (40) : 21691 - 21696
  • [28] A mouse model of sensory neuropathy induced by a long course of monomethyl-auristatin E treatment
    Frachet, Simon
    Danigo, Aurore
    Duchesne, Mathilde
    Richard, Laurence
    Sturtz, Franck
    Magy, Laurent
    Demiot, Claire
    TOXICOLOGY AND APPLIED PHARMACOLOGY, 2023, 474
  • [29] Hydrophilic Monomethyl Auristatin E Derivatives as Novel Candidates for the Design of Antibody-Drug Conjugates
    Ekholm, Filip S.
    Ruokonen, Suvi-Katriina
    Redon, Marina
    Pitkanen, Virve
    Vilkman, Anja
    Saarinen, Juhani
    Helin, Jari
    Satomaa, Tero
    Wiedmer, Susanne K.
    SEPARATIONS, 2018, 6 (01)
  • [30] CD71-Specific Aptamer Conjugated with Monomethyl Auristatin E for the Treatment of Uveal Melanoma
    Zhang, Hui
    Jin, Cheng
    Zhang, Lin
    Peng, Bo
    Zhang, Yibin
    Liu, Yan
    Li, Ling
    Ye, Mao
    Xiong, Wei
    Tan, Weihong
    ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES, 2022, 14 (01) : 32 - 40