Finding the right indicators for assessing quality midwifery care

被引:23
|
作者
de Bruin-Kooistra, Mieneke [1 ]
Amelink-Verburg, Marianne P. [2 ]
Buitendijk, Simone E. [3 ]
Westert, Gert P. [4 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Publ Hlth & Environm RIVM, Ctr Prevent & Hlth Serv Res, NL-3720 BA Bilthoven, Netherlands
[2] Hlth Care Inspectorate IGZ, The Hague, Netherlands
[3] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, NL-2300 RA Leiden, Netherlands
[4] Univ Nijmegen, Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
quality indicators (measurement of quality); outcome and process assessment (health care); maternity care; Delphi method; MATERNITY CARE; HEALTH-CARE; CLINICAL INDICATORS; OF-CARE; PREGNANCY; LABOR;
D O I
10.1093/intqhc/mzs006
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
To identify a set of indicators for monitoring the quality of maternity care for low-risk women provided by primary care midwives and general practitioners (GPs) in the Netherlands. A Project Group (midwives, GPs, policymakers and researchers) defined a long list of potential indicators based on the literature, national guidelines and expert opinion. This list was assessed against the AIRE (Appraisal of Indicators through Research and Evaluation) instrument criteria, resulting in a short list of draft indicators. In a two-round Delphi survey, a multidisciplinary group of stakeholders reviewed the elaborated draft indicators, rating both the relationship between indicator and quality of care and the feasibility. A multidisciplinary expert panel consisting of 28 midwives, 2 GPs, 3 obstetricians and 3 maternity assistants, randomly selected from different regions in the Netherlands. None. Set of quality indicators for midwifery care. The Project Group generated a list of 115 potential indicators which was reduced to 35 using the AIRE criteria. The 35 draft indicators were discussed by a Delphi panel. In total, 26 indicators were recommended by the participants as relevant indicators of midwifery care, representing several levels of measurement. Eight structure indicators, 12 process indicators and 6 outcome indicators were addressing the various phases of midwifery care. We identified a set of quality indicators concerning midwifery care provision in a low-risk population. Practicing maternity care providers adopted the large majority (83) of the draft indicators proposed as a feasible set of indicators, describing the structure, process and outcome. The input from multidisciplinary experts in the process of identifying the right indicators showed to be essential in all phases of development.
引用
收藏
页码:301 / 310
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] An approach to measuring quality of midwifery care
    Wiegers, TA
    Keirse, MJNC
    Berghs, GAH
    vanderZee, J
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1996, 49 (03) : 319 - 325
  • [22] Assessing appropriateness of osteoarthritis care using quality indicators: a systematic review
    Basedow, Martin
    Esterman, Adrian
    JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2015, 21 (05) : 782 - 789
  • [23] Assessing the validity of indicators of the quality of maternal and newborn health care in Kenya
    Blanc, Ann K.
    Warren, Charlotte
    McCarthy, Katharine J.
    Kimani, James
    Ndwiga, Charity
    RamaRao, Saumya
    JOURNAL OF GLOBAL HEALTH, 2016, 6 (01)
  • [24] Are the assessing care of vulnerable elders quality indicators for hypertension wrong? Response
    Min, Lillian
    Mehrotra, Rajnish
    Fung, Constance
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2008, 56 (07) : 1358 - 1358
  • [25] Quality of midwifery led care: assessing the effects of different models of continuity for women's satisfaction
    Morgan, M
    Fenwick, N
    McKenzie, C
    Wolfe, CDA
    QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 1998, 7 (02): : 77 - 82
  • [26] Approach to Assessing Quality Indicators
    Ivanets, O. B.
    Morozova, I., V
    Tereshchenko, Yu M.
    2019 IEEE 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED OPTOELECTRONICS AND LASERS (CAOL), 2019, : 666 - 670
  • [27] Developing quality indicators for assessing quality of birth centre care: a mixed- methods study
    Inge C. Boesveld
    Marieke A. A. Hermus
    Hanneke J. de Graaf
    Marit Hitzert
    Karin M. van der Pal-de Bruin
    Raymond G. de Vries
    Arie Franx
    Therese A. Wiegers
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 17
  • [28] Assessing quality in primary care - Can we ask the right questions?
    Borgiel, A
    ONeil, JJS
    CANADIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 1997, 43 : 1699 - 1700
  • [29] Developing quality indicators for assessing quality of birth centre care: a mixed- methods study
    Boesveld, Inge C.
    Hermus, Marieke A. A.
    de Graaf, Hanneke J.
    Hitzert, Marit
    van der Pal-de Bruin, Karin M.
    de Vries, Raymond G.
    Franx, Arie
    Wiegers, Therese A.
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2017, 17
  • [30] Indicators of Quality of Care in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Seeking the Right Path for Patients
    El-Matary, Wael
    INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES, 2017, 23 (05) : 702 - 703