How to make the unpopular popular? Policy characteristics, social norms and the acceptability of environmental policies

被引:139
|
作者
de Groot, Judith I. M. [1 ]
Schuitema, Geertje [2 ]
机构
[1] Bournemouth Univ, Sch Design Engn Comp & Psychol, Poole BH12 5BB, Dorset, England
[2] Aarhus Univ, Dept Business Adm, DK-8260 Aarhus V, Denmark
关键词
Push measures; Pull measures; Behavioural target; Policy characteristics; Social norms; Acceptability; PRIVATE CAR USE; PUBLIC ACCEPTABILITY; ENERGY POLICIES; TRANSPORT; ATTITUDES; ACTIVATION; MORALITY; BEHAVIOR; AWARENESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsci.2012.03.004
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study examined how policy characteristics (i.e. push versus pull measure and high versus low cost behaviour targeted) and social norms (i.e. strong versus weak social norms) influence the acceptability of environmental policies. Results of a mixed 2 x 2 x 2 subjects design among 123 participants showed that pull measures were evaluated as more acceptable than push measures; and when environmental policies targeted high cost behaviour, participants evaluated policies as less acceptable than when low cost behaviour was targeted. Moreover, a main effect for social norms was found: when it was indicated that a minority instead of a majority of the public supported a policy, acceptability was lower. The results showed two interaction effects. That is, push measures were particularly perceived as unacceptable when: (1) they targeted high cost behaviour, and (2) when a weak social norm was experienced. When a push measure targeted low cost behaviour or when it was clear that the majority of people supported this policy, the environmental policy was almost as acceptable as pull measures. The results imply that push measures should be presented in the correct way to minimise public opposition as to make the unpopular popular. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:100 / 107
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] How Popular Are Social Investment Policies Really? Evidence from a Survey Experiment in Eight Western European Countries
    Neimanns, Erik
    Busemeyer, Marius R.
    Garritzmann, Julian L.
    EUROPEAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2018, 34 (03) : 238 - 253
  • [32] How Welfare Policies Can Change Trust - A Social Experiment Assessing the Impact of Social Assistance Policy on Political and Social Trust
    Betko, Janos
    Spierings, Niels
    Gesthuizen, Maurice
    Scheepers, Peer
    BASIC INCOME STUDIES, 2022, 17 (02) : 155 - 187
  • [33] Housing Policy Reframed? How Conceptual Framing Affects Support for Social Housing Policies in Germany
    Schnepf, Julia
    Christmann, Ursula
    Groeben, Norbert
    GERMAN POLITICS, 2023, 32 (02) : 381 - 402
  • [34] How churches make education policy: the churchification of Hungarian education and the social question under religious populism
    Neumann, Eszter
    RELIGION STATE & SOCIETY, 2024,
  • [35] Social and environmental preferences: measuring how people make tradeoffs among themselves, others, and collective goods
    Fleiss, Juergen
    Ackermann, Kurt A.
    Fleiss, Eva
    Murphy, Ryan O.
    Posch, Alfred
    CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2020, 28 (03) : 1049 - 1067
  • [36] Social and environmental preferences: measuring how people make tradeoffs among themselves, others, and collective goods
    Jürgen Fleiß
    Kurt A. Ackermann
    Eva Fleiß
    Ryan O. Murphy
    Alfred Posch
    Central European Journal of Operations Research, 2020, 28 : 1049 - 1067
  • [37] Thou Shalt Recycle: How Social Norms of Environmental Protection Narrow the Scope of the Low-Cost Hypothesis
    Keuschnigg, Marc
    Kratz, Fabian
    ENVIRONMENT AND BEHAVIOR, 2018, 50 (10) : 1059 - 1091
  • [38] Understanding the public acceptability of road pricing and the roles of older age, social norms, pro-social values and trust for urban policy-making: The case of Bristol
    Nikitas, Alexandros
    Avineri, Erel
    Parkhurst, Graham
    CITIES, 2018, 79 : 78 - 91
  • [39] Recent Australian market mechanisms as a component of an environmental policy that can make choices between sustainability and social justice
    McKay J.
    Bjornlund H.
    Social Justice Research, 2001, 14 (4) : 387 - 403
  • [40] How to integrate social and environmental aspects in housing and urban policies: Some experiences from France and Germany
    Laigle, L
    Oehler, V
    SUSTAINABLE CITY III: URBAN REGENERATION AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2004, 18 : 443 - 452