How to make the unpopular popular? Policy characteristics, social norms and the acceptability of environmental policies

被引:139
|
作者
de Groot, Judith I. M. [1 ]
Schuitema, Geertje [2 ]
机构
[1] Bournemouth Univ, Sch Design Engn Comp & Psychol, Poole BH12 5BB, Dorset, England
[2] Aarhus Univ, Dept Business Adm, DK-8260 Aarhus V, Denmark
关键词
Push measures; Pull measures; Behavioural target; Policy characteristics; Social norms; Acceptability; PRIVATE CAR USE; PUBLIC ACCEPTABILITY; ENERGY POLICIES; TRANSPORT; ATTITUDES; ACTIVATION; MORALITY; BEHAVIOR; AWARENESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsci.2012.03.004
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study examined how policy characteristics (i.e. push versus pull measure and high versus low cost behaviour targeted) and social norms (i.e. strong versus weak social norms) influence the acceptability of environmental policies. Results of a mixed 2 x 2 x 2 subjects design among 123 participants showed that pull measures were evaluated as more acceptable than push measures; and when environmental policies targeted high cost behaviour, participants evaluated policies as less acceptable than when low cost behaviour was targeted. Moreover, a main effect for social norms was found: when it was indicated that a minority instead of a majority of the public supported a policy, acceptability was lower. The results showed two interaction effects. That is, push measures were particularly perceived as unacceptable when: (1) they targeted high cost behaviour, and (2) when a weak social norm was experienced. When a push measure targeted low cost behaviour or when it was clear that the majority of people supported this policy, the environmental policy was almost as acceptable as pull measures. The results imply that push measures should be presented in the correct way to minimise public opposition as to make the unpopular popular. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:100 / 107
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Can welfare policy make use of social norms?
    Bird, EJ
    RATIONALITY AND SOCIETY, 1999, 11 (03) : 343 - 365
  • [2] Acceptability of plastic policies: Cross-cultural insights on social norms and trust
    Hertzberg, Lina
    Bergquist, Magnus
    Obianuju, Olorondu Winner
    Nilsson, Andreas
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2025, 163
  • [3] How beliefs and policy characteristics shape the public acceptability of nutritional policies-A survey study in Germany
    Andreas, Marike
    Kaiser, Anna K.
    Dhami, Raenhha
    Brugger, Vincent
    Sniehotta, Falko F.
    HEALTH POLICY, 2025, 152
  • [4] Is Social Policy Retrenchment Unpopular? How Welfare Reforms Affect Government Popularity
    Giger, Nathalie
    EUROPEAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2012, 28 (05) : 691 - 700
  • [5] How to Make Citizens Behave: Social Psychology, Liberal Virtues, and Social Norms
    McTernan, Emily
    JOURNAL OF POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY, 2014, 22 (01) : 84 - 104
  • [6] The challenge and promise at the intersection of environmental and social policies: How the World Bank established a policy framework that fully integrates environmental and social concerns
    Di Leva, Charles E.
    GLOBAL SOCIAL POLICY, 2021, 21 (02) : 344 - 348
  • [7] Are Citizens Ready to Make an Environmental Effort? A Study of the Social Acceptability of Biogas in France
    Sebastien Bourdin
    Angélique Chassy
    Environmental Management, 2023, 71 : 1228 - 1239
  • [8] Are Citizens Ready to Make an Environmental Effort? A Study of the Social Acceptability of Biogas in France
    Bourdin, Sebastien
    Chassy, Angelique
    ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 71 (06) : 1228 - 1239
  • [9] Social norms and elections: How elected rules can make behavior (in)appropriate
    Apffelstaedt, Arno
    Freundt, Jana
    Oslislo, Christoph
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2022, 196 : 148 - 177
  • [10] General Antecedents of Personal Norms, Policy Acceptability, and Intentions: The Role of Values, Worldviews, and Environmental Concern
    Steg, Linda
    De Groot, Judith I. M.
    Dreijerink, Lieke
    Abrahamse, Wokje
    Siero, Frans
    SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 2011, 24 (04) : 349 - 367