Validation of the Simplified Chinese Version of the Functional Rating Index for Patients With Low Back Pain

被引:15
|
作者
Wei, Xianzhao [1 ]
Chen, Zhi [1 ]
Bai, Yushu [1 ]
Zhu, Xiaodong [1 ]
Wu, Dajiang [1 ]
Liu, Xinwei [1 ]
Yi, Honglei [1 ]
Chen, Ziqiang [1 ]
Wang, Chuanfeng [1 ]
Zhao, Yingchuan [1 ]
Yang, Changwei [1 ]
Li, Jingfeng [1 ]
Li, Ming [1 ]
机构
[1] Second Mil Med Univ, Changhai Hosp, Dept Orthoped, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
关键词
Functional Rating Index (FRI); simplified Chinese; low back pain; validity; reliability; REPORT OUTCOME MEASURES; SF-36 HEALTH SURVEY; CULTURAL-ADAPTATION;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0b013e318252ddd1
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Cross-cultural translation and psychometric testing of the Functional Rating Index (FRI). Objective. To evaluate the reliability and validity of the adapted simplified Chinese FRI (SC-FRI) for patients with low back pain (LBP). Summary of Background Data. The FRI is a reliable and valid instrument to assess the perception of function and pain for patients with LBP. However, there is no culturally adapted, reliable, and validated FRI for use in mainland China. Methods. The translation and cross-cultural adaptation were performed following international guidelines. The SC-FRI was administered to 115 patients with LBP along with the simplified Chinese version of the Oswestry Disability Index, 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, and the visual analogue scale. Psychometric testing included internal consistency, test-test reliability, concurrent criterion validity, and construct validity. Results. A high completion rate of 96% and no floor or ceiling effects were noted for the SC-FRI. The internal consistency was good (i.e., Cronbach alpha = 0.897 for the overall SC-FRI; range, 0.851-0.890, if an item was deleted). Test-retest reliability was excellent, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.948 (95% confidence interval, 0.917-0.968). Concurrent criterion validity assessment demonstrated that the SC-FRI significantly correlated with the visual analogue scale (r = 0.852, P < 0.0001) and the simplified Chinese version of the Oswestry Disability Index (r = 0.958, P < 0.0001). Construct validity was confirmed by the significant Pearson correlation between the SC-FRI and Physical Functioning (r = -0.802, P < 0.0001), Bodily Pain (r = -0.698, P < 0.0001), Social Functioning (r = -0.573, P < 0.0001), Role-Physical (r = -0.503, P < 0.0001), and General Health (r = -0.502, P < 0.0001) domains of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey. Conclusion. The SC-FRI showed excellent reliability and validity in the evaluation of pain and the functional health status of Chinese-speaking patients with LBP. It is simple and easy to use and can be recommended in clinical and research practice in mainland China.
引用
收藏
页码:1602 / 1608
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Reliability and validity of the Functional Rating Index in older people with low back pain: Preliminary report
    Bayar B.
    Bayar K.
    Yakut E.
    Yakut Y.
    Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 2004, 16 (1) : 49 - 52
  • [42] Reliability and validity of the Functional Rating Index in older people with low back pain: Preliminary report
    Bayar, B
    Bayar, K
    Yakut, E
    Yakut, Y
    AGING CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2004, 16 (01) : 49 - 52
  • [43] Validation of the functional rating index for the assessment of athletes with neck pain
    Naghdi, Soofia
    Ansari, Noureddin Nakhostin
    ShamsSalehi, Somaye
    Feise, Ronald J.
    Entezary, Ebrahim
    WORLD JOURNAL OF ORTHOPEDICS, 2016, 7 (08): : 507 - 512
  • [44] Reliability and Validity of Simplified Chinese Version of Roland-Morris Questionnaire in Evaluating Rural and Urban Patients with Low Back Pain
    Yi, Honglei
    Ji, Xinran
    Wei, Xianzhao
    Chen, Ziqiang
    Wang, Xinhui
    Zhu, Xiaodong
    Zhang, Wei
    Chen, Jiayu
    Zhang, Diqing
    Li, Ming
    PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (01):
  • [45] DISABILITY IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC NON-SPECIFIC LOW BACK PAIN: VALIDATION OF THE SLOVENE VERSION OF THE OSWESTRY DISABILITY INDEX
    Klemenc-Ketis, Zalika
    ZDRAVSTVENO VARSTVO, 2011, 50 (02): : 87 - 94
  • [46] Validation of Simplified Chinese Version of the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (SC-PSEQ) and SC-PSEQ-2 for Patients With Nonspecific Low Back Pain in Mainland China
    Yang, Yilin
    Yang, Mingyuan
    Bai, Jinyi
    Zhao, Jian
    Chen, Kai
    Zhou, Xiaoyi
    Wei, Xianzhao
    Li, Ming
    SPINE, 2019, 44 (20) : E1219 - E1226
  • [47] Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Thai version of the core outcome measures index for the back (COMI-back) in patients with low back pain
    Santipas, Borriwat
    Luksanapruksa, Panya
    Ruangchainikom, Monchai
    Korwutthikulrangsri, Ekkapoj
    Poolpol, Sarunya
    Wilartratsami, Sirichai
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2025, 34 (02) : 441 - 453
  • [48] Validation of a Simplified Chinese Version of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale and an Exploration of the Factors Predicting Catastrophizing in Pain Clinic Patients
    Xu, Ximing
    Wei, Xianzhao
    Wang, Fei
    Liu, Jie
    Chen, Hui
    Xiong, Yuanchang
    Li, Ming
    PAIN PHYSICIAN, 2015, 18 (06) : E1059 - E1072
  • [49] Translation and validation of Simplified Chinese version of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale in chronic pain patients: Education may matter
    Shen, Bangli
    Wu, Bo
    Abdullah, Taha B.
    Zhan, Gonghao
    Lian, Qingquan
    Apkarian, Apkar Vania
    Huang, Lejian
    MOLECULAR PAIN, 2018, 14
  • [50] LOW-BACK-PAIN RATING-SCALE - VALIDATION OF A TOOL FOR ASSESSMENT OF LOW-BACK-PAIN
    MANNICHE, C
    ASMUSSEN, K
    LAURITSEN, B
    VINTERBERG, H
    KREINER, S
    JORDAN, A
    PAIN, 1994, 57 (03) : 317 - 326