Inequity in Adoption of Advanced Diabetes Technologies Among Medicare Fee-for-service Beneficiaries

被引:14
|
作者
Wherry, Kael [1 ]
Zhu, Cyrus [1 ]
Vigersky, Robert A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Medtron Diabet, Northridge, CA 91325 USA
来源
关键词
type; 1; diabetes; race-ethnicity; Medicare; insulin pump; continuous glucose monitoring; INSULIN PUMP THERAPY; ETHNIC DISPARITIES; TYPE-1; YOUTH; OUTCOMES; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1210/clinem/dgab869
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context Health inequity is often associated with race-ethnicity. Objective To determine the prevalence of insulin pump therapy and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) among Medicare beneficiaries with type 1 diabetes (T1D) by race-ethnicity, and to compare diabetes-related technology users with nonusers. Design The prevalence of technology use (pump, CGM) was determined by race-ethnicity for enrollees in coverage years (CY) 2017-2019 in the Medicare fee-for-service database. Using CY2019 data, technology users were compared with nonusers by race-ethnicity, sex, average age, Medicare eligibility criteria, and visit to an endocrinologist. Setting Community Patients or Other Participants Beneficiaries with T1D and at least 1 inpatient or 2 outpatient claims in a CY. Intervention(s) Pump or CGM therapy, visit to an endocrinologist. Main Outcome Measure(s) Diabetes-related technology use by race-ethnicity groups. Results Between 2017 and 2019, CGM and insulin pump use increased among all groups. Prevalence of insulin pump use was < 5% for Black and Other beneficiaries yet increased from 14% to 18% among White beneficiaries. In CY2019, 57% of White patients used a pump compared with 33.1% of Black and 30.3% of Other patients (P < 0.001). Black patients were more likely than White patients to be eligible because of disability/end-stage renal disease or to be Medicare/Medicaid eligible (both P < 0.001), whether using technology or not. Significant race-ethnicity differences (P < 0.001) existed between technology users and nonusers for all evaluated factors except visiting an endocrinologist. Conclusions Significant race-ethnicity associated differences existed in T1D management. The gap in diabetic technology adoption between Black and White beneficiaries grew between 2017 and 2019.
引用
收藏
页码:E2177 / E2185
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Geographic Variation in Cardiovascular Procedure Use Among Medicare Fee-for-Service vs Medicare Advantage Beneficiaries
    Matlock, Daniel D.
    Groeneveld, Peter W.
    Sidney, Steve
    Shetterly, Susan
    Goodrich, Glenn
    Glenn, Karen
    Xu, Stan
    Yang, Lin
    Farmer, Steven A.
    Reynolds, Kristi
    Cassidy-Bushrow, Andrea E.
    Lieu, Tracy
    Boudreau, Denise M.
    Greenlee, Robert T.
    Tom, Jeffrey
    Vupputuri, Suma
    Adams, Kenneth F.
    Smith, David H.
    Gunter, Margaret J.
    Go, Alan S.
    Magid, David J.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2013, 310 (02): : 155 - 162
  • [22] Inpatient Utilization and Costs for Medicare Fee-for-Service Beneficiaries with Heart Failure
    Fitch, Kathryn
    Pelizzari, Pamela M.
    Pyenson, Bruce
    AMERICAN HEALTH AND DRUG BENEFITS, 2016, 9 (02): : 96 - 103
  • [23] Use of vision services and satisfaction with care among medicare beneficiaries with fee-for-service versus managed Medicare.
    Mangione, CM
    Keeler, EB
    Adams, JL
    Lee, PP
    Coleman, AL
    Shapiro, MF
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2000, 15 : 133 - 133
  • [24] Disparities in Receipt of Eye Exams Among Medicare Part B Fee-for-Service Beneficiaries with Diabetes - United States, 2017
    Lundeen, Elizabeth A.
    Wittenborn, John
    Benoit, Stephen R.
    Saaddine, Jinan
    MMWR-MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY WEEKLY REPORT, 2019, 68 (45): : 1020 - 1023
  • [25] Quality of Hospices Used by Medicare Advantage and Traditional Fee-for-Service Beneficiaries
    White, Lindsay L. Y.
    Sun, Chuxuan
    Coe, Norma B.
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2024, 7 (12)
  • [26] Representativeness of Get with the Guidelines-Stroke among Fee-for-Service Medicare Beneficiaries with Ischemic Stroke
    Reeves, Mathew J.
    Smith, Eric E.
    Fonarow, Gregg C.
    Olson, DaiWai M.
    Hernandez, Adrian F.
    Curtis, Lesley H.
    Liang, Li
    Pan, Wendy
    Peterson, Eric D.
    Schwamm, Lee H.
    STROKE, 2011, 42 (03) : E338 - E338
  • [27] Trends in Use of Thrombolytic Therapy Among Fee-For-Service Medicare Beneficiaries With Acute Pulmonary Embolism
    Bikdeli, Behnood
    Wang, Yun
    Minges, Karl
    Nallamothu, Brahmajee K.
    Kim, Nancy
    Desai, Mayur
    Masoudi, Frederick A.
    Spertus, John A.
    Goldhaber, Samuel Z.
    Krumholz, Harlan M.
    CIRCULATION, 2013, 128 (22)
  • [28] Regional Differences in the Impact of Rurality on Ischemic Stroke Hospitalization Among Fee-for-Service Medicare Beneficiaries
    Rabah, Abdullah
    Dalmacy, Djhenne
    Quadri, Fayz
    Kanneganti, Nitin
    Tiruneh, Yordanos
    Berry, Jarett
    CIRCULATION, 2024, 150
  • [29] Persistence of High-Need Status Over Time Among Fee-for-Service Medicare Beneficiaries
    Keeney, Tamra
    Joyce, Nina R.
    Meyers, David J.
    Mor, Vincent
    Belanger, Emmanuelle
    MEDICAL CARE RESEARCH AND REVIEW, 2021, 78 (05) : 591 - 597
  • [30] COVID-19-Related Deaths And Excess Deaths Among Medicare Fee-For-Service Beneficiaries
    Tarazi, Wafa W.
    Finegold, Kenneth
    Sheingold, Steven H.
    Samson, Lok Wong
    Zuckerman, Rachael
    Bosworth, Arielle
    HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2021, 40 (06) : 879 - 885