A Comparison of the Effects of Midazolam/Fentanyl and Midazolam/Tramadol for Conscious Intravenous Sedation During Third Molar Extraction

被引:25
|
作者
Goktay, Ozgen [1 ]
Satilmis, Tulin [1 ]
Garip, Hasan [1 ]
Gonul, Onur [1 ]
Goker, Kamil [1 ]
机构
[1] Marmara Univ, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Fac Dent, TR-34365 Istanbul, Marmara, Turkey
关键词
PATIENT-CONTROLLED SEDATION; PREVENTING POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; ANALGESIC EFFICACY; TRAMADOL; REMIFENTANIL; COMBINATION; 3RD-MOLAR; RECOVERY; FENTANYL; PLACEBO;
D O I
10.1016/j.joms.2010.09.005
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: This study evaluated the effects of fentanyl and tramadol, used in combination, as sedation for third molar surgical extraction. Patients and Methods: This prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study included 60 patients undergoing extraction of a horizontal third molar with an Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale score above 10 points. All of the patients were first given a 0.03-mg/kg bolus of midazolam, and then they were randomized into 3 groups: group A, midazolam only; group B, midazolam and 1-mu g/kg fentanyl; and group C, midazolam and 1-mg/kg tramadol. The vital signs were recorded. Patients were assessed for postoperative pain and adverse effects, and patient and surgeon satisfaction was assessed. Results: No differences were found in the heart rate among groups (P > .05). The mean blood pressure was also similar until the 40th minute, after which the mean blood pressure in the patients in group A was lower than that in the other 2 groups (P < .01). In the postoperative pain assessment, the visual analog scale scores of the patients in group C were lower than those in the other 2 groups in the first postoperative hour (P < .05). The time at which the first rescue analgesic was taken in groups A, B, and C was 3, 3.5, and 5 hours postoperatively, respectively, and was significantly later in group C (P < .01). No difference was found in patient/surgeon satisfaction among the groups. Conclusions: Tramadol has a better analgesic effect in third molar surgery than fentanyl and placebo. (C) 2011 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons J Oral Maxillofac Surg 69:1594-1599, 2011
引用
收藏
页码:1594 / 1599
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effects of Midazolam/Low-Dose Ketamine Conscious Intravenous Sedation on Pain, Swelling, and Trismus After Surgical Extraction of Third Molars
    Garip, Hasan
    Satilmis, Tulin
    Dergin, Guhan
    Ugurlu, Faysal
    Goker, Kamil
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2011, 69 (04) : 1023 - 1030
  • [22] Comparison of midazolam sedation with or without fentanyl in cataract surgery
    Cok, O. Yalcin
    Ertan, A.
    Bahadir, M.
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA BELGICA, 2008, 59 (01) : 27 - 32
  • [23] Conscious sedation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography:: midazolam or midazolam plus meperidine?
    Yuksel, Osman
    Parlak, Erkan
    Koklu, Seyfettin
    Ertugrul, Ibrahim
    Tunc, Bilge
    Sahin, Burhan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2007, 19 (11) : 1002 - 1006
  • [24] An outcome study comparing intravenous sedation with midazolam/fentanyl (conscious sedation) versus propofol infusion (deep sedation) for aesthetic surgery
    White, PF
    Coleman, JE
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2003, 112 (06) : 1690 - 1691
  • [25] The clinical study on the sedative effect and recovery in patients undergoing intravenous conscious sedation with midazolam for mandibular third molars extraction
    Kwak, Juhee
    Jang, Jinhyun
    Kim, Jinwoo
    Kim, Myung-Rae
    Kim, Sun-Jong
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN ASSOCIATION OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGEONS, 2010, 36 (05) : 408 - 412
  • [26] A comparison of midazolam plus fentanyl or pethidine as sedation for colonoscopy
    Hayee, BH
    Rowbotham, DS
    Saxena, V
    McNair, A
    GUT, 2006, 55 : A4 - A5
  • [27] Comparison of midazolam and midazolam-fentanyl combination for sedation in convex probe endobronchial ultrasound
    Comert, Sevda Sener
    Caglayan, Benan
    Fidan, Ali
    Salepci, Banu
    Parmaksiz, Elif Torun
    TURK GOGUS KALP DAMAR CERRAHISI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2015, 23 (04): : 708 - 713
  • [28] A COMPARISON OF MIDAZOLAM AND DIAZEPAM FOR INTRAVENOUS SEDATION IN DENTISTRY
    AUN, C
    FLYNN, PJ
    RICHARDS, J
    ANAESTHESIA, 1984, 39 (06) : 589 - 593
  • [29] A COMPARISON OF MIDAZOLAM WITH AND WITHOUT NALBUPHINE FOR INTRAVENOUS SEDATION
    BARCLAY, JK
    HUNTER, KM
    ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1990, 70 (02): : 137 - 141
  • [30] Efficiency of propofol sedation versus conscious sedation with midazolam and fentanyl in a pediatric endoscopy unit
    Lightdale, J
    Valim, C
    Newburg, A
    Zgleszewski, S
    Donovan, K
    Heard, L
    Fox, V
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2005, 61 (05) : AB92 - AB92