Stop and start control at work: Differential validity of two types of self-control for work behavior and emotion regulation

被引:7
|
作者
van Hooft, Edwin A. J. [1 ]
Kreemers, Loes M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Work & Org Psychol, POB 15919, NL-1001 NK Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Amsterdam Univ Appl Sci, Psychol Sustainable Cities, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
emotion regulation; self-control; start-control; stop-control; work behavior; ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIORS; JOB-PERFORMANCE; COUNTERPRODUCTIVE BEHAVIORS; PERSONALITY-TRAITS; NARROW; BROAD; CONSCIENTIOUSNESS; SCALE; PREDICTION; FACETS;
D O I
10.1111/ijsa.12359
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Self-control enables people to regulate their emotions, desires, cognitions, and behaviors. We distinguish between two types of self-control (i.e., inhibitory/stop-control and initiatory/start-control), revised De Boer et al.'s stop/start-control scales (Study 1), and examined their value in predicting work-related behavior and emotion regulation among employees in a two-wave design (Study 2). The findings show that stop- and start-control have differential predictive validity: Stop-control relates negatively to counterproductive work behavior and positively to expressive suppression, whereas start-control relates positively to increasing challenging job demands (job crafting), cognitive reappraisal, and positive framing. Moreover, usefulness analyses supported the incremental validity of the narrow stop/start-control facets beyond general trait self-control. These findings illustrate the value of stop/start-control at work, further substantiate stop/start-control theory, and suggest organizations should take stop/start-control into account (e.g., in personnel selection, job design).
引用
收藏
页码:265 / 280
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条