Imperial Sugar Refinery Combustible Dust Explosion Investigation

被引:31
|
作者
Vorderbrueggen, John B. [1 ]
机构
[1] US Chem Safety Board, Washington, DC 20037 USA
关键词
combustible dust; sugar dust; dust explosion; NFPA; 654; 499; Chemical Safety Board;
D O I
10.1002/prs.10445
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
On February 7, 2008, at about 7:15 p.m., a series of sugar dust explosions at the Imperial Sugar manufacturing facility in Port Wentworth, GA, resulted in 14 worker fatalities. Thirty-six workers were treated for serious burns and injuries some caused permanent, lye-altering conditions. The explosions and subsequent fires destroyed the sugar packing buildings, palletizer room, and silos, and severely damaged the bulk train car loading area and parts of the sugar refining process areas. The Imperial Sugar manufacturing facility housed a refinery that converts raw cane sugar into granulated sugar A system of screw and belt conveyors and bucket elevators transported granulated sugar from the refinery to three 105-foot tall sugar storage silos. Granulated sugar was then transported through conveyors and bucket elevators to specialty sugar processing areas and granulated sugar packaging machines. Sugar products were packaged in a four-story building surrounding the silos that contained packaging machines for the sugar products. Granulated sugar was also bulk shipped in railcars and tanker trucks in the bulk sugar loading area. The U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (CSB) determined that the first dust explosion occurred in the enclosed steel belt conveyor located below the sugar silos. Steel cover panels installed on the belt conveyor less than a year before the explosion allowed explosive concentrations of sugar dust to accumulate inside the enclosure. An unknown source ignited the sugar dust, causing a violent explosion. The explosion lofted sugar dust that had accumulated on the floors and elevated horizontal surfaces, propagating more dust explosions through the buildings. Secondary dust explosions occurred throughout the packing buildings, parts of the refinery, and the bulk sugar loading buildings. The pressure waves from the explosions heaved thick concrete floors and collapsed brick walls, blocking stairwell and other exit routes. The resulting fires destroyed the packing buildings, silos, palletizer building and heavily damaged pans of the refinery and bulk sugar loading area. The CSB investigation identified the following incident causes: 1. Sugar and cornstarch conveying equipment was not designed or maintained to minimize the release of sugar and sugar dust into the work area. 2. Inadequate housekeeping practices resulted in significant accumulations of combustible granulated and powdered sugar and combustible sugar dust on the floors and elevated surfaces throughout the packing buildings. 3. Airborne combustible sugar dust accumulated above the minimum explosible concentration inside the newly enclosed steel belt assembly under silos 1 and 2. 4. An overheated bearing in the steel belt conveyor most likely ignited a primary dust explosion. 5. The primary dust explosion inside the enclosed steel conveyor belt under silos 1 and 2 triggered massive secondary dust explosions and fires throughout the packing buildings. 6. Accumulated sugar dust and spilled sugar fueled the secondary explosions and fires. All 14 fatalities were the result of these secondary events. This article presents the CSB investigation and discusses important management practices to prevent similar combustible dust explosions. Published 2011 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Process Saf Prog 30: 66-81, 2011
引用
收藏
页码:66 / 81
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Investigation on the Explosion Process and Chemical Activity of Pyrite Dust
    Yunzhang Rao
    Tao Huang
    Changshun Tian
    Cairong Xiang
    Gang Su
    Russian Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 2023, 97 : 894 - 901
  • [42] Investigation on the Explosion Process and Chemical Activity of Pyrite Dust
    Rao, Yunzhang
    Huang, Tao
    Tian, Changshun
    Xiang, Cairong
    Su, Gang
    RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A, 2023, 97 (05) : 894 - 901
  • [43] Experimental investigation of the pressure characteristics in the dust explosion venting
    Chen, Xiangfeng
    Xu, Jintao
    Zhang, Tianjiao
    Jiang, Haipeng
    Zhang, Zongling
    Zhang, Changshuai
    Zhang, Kai
    Gao, Wei
    POWDER TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 406
  • [44] explosion protection: considerations for combustible Dusts
    Nixon, Clive
    Chemical Engineering (United States), 2021, 128 (07): : 30 - 34
  • [45] Erratum to “Explosion characteristics of combustible wood dust in confined system: Analysis using oxygen consumption energy”
    Yun Seok Kim
    Min Chul Lee
    DongHo Rie
    Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2017, 31 : 479 - 479
  • [46] Addressing Combustible Dust Hazards
    Perry, Judy
    Myers, Molly R.
    Murphy, Michelle
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING PROGRESS, 2011, 107 (05) : 36 - 41
  • [47] OSHA TARGETS COMBUSTIBLE DUST
    Hanson, David J.
    CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS, 2011, 89 (23) : 34 - 35
  • [48] 2023 COMBUSTIBLE DUST INCIDENTS
    Cloney, Chris
    PULP & PAPER-CANADA, 2025, 126 (01)
  • [49] In shale refinery ATP round silo warehouse dust explosion mechanism and control technology research
    Li Fangwei
    Ge Shaocheng
    Qi Qingjie
    Jin Longzhe
    3RD INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON MODERN MINING & SAFETY TECHNOLOGY PROCEEDINGS, 2008, : 182 - 186
  • [50] Investigation of the explosion-related parameters and their influence on the severity of an explosion involving aluminum dust
    Balantic, Janez
    Balantic, Danijela A. Skobir
    Novosel, Barbara
    PROCESS SAFETY PROGRESS, 2019, 38 (04)