Systemic risk contribution of financial institutions in South Africa

被引:0
|
作者
Leukes, Chanelle [1 ]
Mensah, Jones Odei [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Witwatersrand, Wits Business Sch, 2 St Davids Pl, ZA-2193 Johannesburg, South Africa
来源
关键词
Systemic Risk; South Africa; CoVaR; Granger causality network;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The recent global financial crisis of 2007-2008 highlighted the necessity of measuring systemic risk amongst banks, insurance firms, and other systemically important institutions, as the failure of these organisations could have incalculable consequences on the financial sector and spillover to the real economy. An investigation into systemic risk is limited in emerging markets, including South Africa, thus maintaining financial stability can be challenging for regulators due to inadequate risk measurements being applied as well as insufficient monitoring of the vulnerable role-players within the financial system. This paper employs two systemic risk measures: the Conditional Value-at-Risk measure referred to as CoVaR pioneered by Adrian and Brunnermeier (2011) and Granger causality tests proposed by Billio et al. (2012). CoVaR is used to determine the systemic risk contribution of individual institutions and Granger causality tests depict the interconnectedness within the financial system that leads to risk spillover to other institutions. The study analyses 22 financial firms within the banking, insurance, and financial services sectors for the period 2005-2017. The results suggest that spillovers increase during distressed periods and that banks and insurance firms are the highest contributors to systemic risk.
引用
收藏
页码:188 / 218
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Knowledge level modeling for systemic risk management in financial institutions
    Ye, Kang
    Yan, Jiaqi
    Wang, Shanshan
    Wang, Huaiqing
    Miao, Baiqi
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2011, 38 (04) : 3528 - 3538
  • [32] Assessing the contribution of shadow banking to systemic risk in South Africa during COVID-19
    Mashimbye, Lawrence
    Fanta, Ashenafi B.
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC AND MANAGEMENT SCIENCES, 2024, 27 (01)
  • [33] Effect of Micro-Agricultural Financial Institutions of South Africa financial services on livelihood capital of beneficiaries in North West Province South Africa
    Oladele I.
    Ward L.
    Agriculture & Food Security, 6 (1):
  • [34] Impact of COVID-19 on systemic risk for Indian financial institutions
    Karmakar S.
    Bandyopadhyay G.
    Pamucar D.
    Mukhopadhyaya J.N.
    Biswas S.
    International Journal of Applied Decision Sciences, 2023, 16 (06) : 686 - 716
  • [35] DIVERSIFICATION AT FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS AND SYSTEMIC RISK: CONSIDERATION OF EXTREME TAIL RISKS
    Duport, Noelle
    Fina, Eric
    Goyeau, Daniel
    REVUE ECONOMIQUE, 2018, 69 (03): : 477 - 504
  • [36] Key Determinants of Corporate Governance in Financial Institutions: Evidence from South Africa
    Khoza, Floyd
    Makina, Daniel
    Makoni, Patricia Lindelwa
    RISKS, 2024, 12 (06)
  • [37] Systemic Risk and Public Institutions Evolving Perspectives from the Financial Crisis
    Spatt, Chester
    NEW INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL SYSTEM: ANALYZING THE CUMULATIVE IMPACT OF REGULATORY REFORM, 2016, 48 : 197 - 214
  • [38] FROM THE CAPM WITH SYSTEMIC RISK TO THE DESIGNATION OF THE SYSTEMICALLY IMPORTANT FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
    Garibal, Jean-Charles
    Kouontchou, Patrick
    Maillet, Bertrand
    REVUE ECONOMIQUE, 2018, 69 (03): : 443 - 475
  • [39] The role of media coverage in measuring the systemic risk of Chinese financial institutions
    Dong, Minghua
    Xiong, Xiong
    Li, Xiao
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2021, 53 (53) : 6138 - 6152
  • [40] Assessing the contribution of China's financial sectors to systemic risk
    Morelli, David
    Vioto, Davide
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL STABILITY, 2020, 50