The Supreme Court, Process Patents, and Medical Innovation.

被引：0

|

作者：

Kesselheim, Aaron S. ^{[1
,2
]}

机构：

[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Med, Div Pharmacoepidemiol & Pharmacoecon, Boston, MA 02115 USA

[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA

来源：

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE | 2009年 / 361卷 / 24期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1056/NEJMp0909658

中图分类号：

R5 [内科学];

学科分类号：

1002 ; 100201 ;

摘要：

[No abstract available]

引用

收藏

页码：2303 / 2306

页数：4

相关论文

共 50 条

[21] Supreme Court closes loophole for copycat patents
Knight, J
NATURE, 2002, 417 (6889) : 575 - 575
[22] Supreme Court Rules Against Gene Patents
Kuehn, Bridget M.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2013, 310 (04): : 357 - 359
[23] Innovation and employment - Process versus product innovation.
Niosi, J
JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR NATIONALOKONOMIE, 2002, 76 (02): : 194 - 196
[24] Supreme Court decision might strengthen biomarker patents
不详
NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY, 2010, 9 (08) : 586 - 586
[25] US Supreme Court applies strict limits to patents
Debra Robertson
Nature Biotechnology, 2002, 20 : 639 - 639
[26] The festo decision and the return of the Supreme Court to the bar of patents
Duffy, JF
SUPREME COURT REVIEW, 2003, : 273 - 342
[27] PATENTS AND COMPUTER PROGRAMS - SUPREME COURT MAKES A DECISION
BASANTA, WE
KENTUCKY LAW JOURNAL, 1973, 62 (02): : 533 - 556
[28] US Supreme Court applies strict limits to patents
Robertson, D
NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2002, 20 (07) : 639 - 639
[29] Supreme Court decision impacts the strength of US patents
Courtenay C. Brinckerhoff
Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 2016, 15 : 524 - 524
[30] Medical marijuana and the Supreme Court
Okie, S
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 353 (07): : 648 - 651

← 1 2 3 4 5 →